BrainKing - 掲示板 (Chinese Chess)

管理人: rod03801

Chinese Chess

Xiangqi - Chinese Chess

Knights and Rooks may join the Xiangqi Fellowship which has additional boards for discussion and resources (links to other sites).
Pawns may not join the fellowships, but links from the Xiangqi resources board are have been copied to a Resources message.
Create a New game of Xiangqi, Established ratings, Provisional ratings, The Rules of Xiangqi.
___________________________

掲示板表
この掲示板でメッセージを作成にはポーン会員以上の会員レベルが必要となりますので、あなたは作成権限が有りません。

モード: 誰でも投稿可能

27. ５月 2010, 21:21:08

kleineme

このユーザーの投稿を表示 | スレッドを表示 | リンク

件名: Arbiter needed

I need some help from the XQ rule experts among you. Please take a look at one of my games. According to my interpretation of Chapter 21 within the Asian rules I am of the opinion that my opponent has to stop chasing my rook and play another move either instead of Ng3 or instead of Ni2. My opponent doesn't agree so I need someone who explains to him why he has to change moves, or someone who explains to me why I have to change moves. Thanks in advance!

27. ５月 2010, 23:08:33

Pedro Martínez

このユーザーの投稿を表示 | スレッドを表示 | リンク

件名: Re: Arbiter needed

kleineme: You don't need to refer to the Asian Rules. The BK rules clearly provide that:
“Perpetual chasing of an unprotected enemy piece is forbidden too. It means that a player cannot attack the same enemy piece (which is not protected by another enemy piece) moving to and from the same two points indefinitely. The player who causes such situation is obliged to break it off.”

28. ５月 2010, 10:38:10

Bughunter42

このユーザーの投稿を表示 | スレッドを表示 | リンク

件名: Re: Arbiter needed

Bughunter42 (28. ５月 2010, 10:38:51)に変更されました。

Pedro Martínez, kleineme:
I have to agree to both of you. The asian rules are just saying the same like the BK rules, just more detailed for special situations. So in my opinion your opponent has to stop chasing your rook in this perpetual way.