 |
|
 TournamentsPlease use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE Tournaments Team Tournaments Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Ratsu. Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
<< < 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 > >> 23. Lokakuu 2004, 16:07:12 apparently timing out is an emergency ;) 23. Lokakuu 2004, 16:03:58 How does the auto vacation know it's an emergency LOL. 23. Lokakuu 2004, 16:00:02 Otsikko: Re: It is the auto vacation that is for "emergencies" Sky... If it is not an emergency then one can use the vacations normally. 23. Lokakuu 2004, 15:41:57 I didn't know vacation time was for emergency's. 23. Lokakuu 2004, 07:37:58 Otsikko: Re: Come on Ug....RU flurting with me again? :)
I miss our debates. No, really... Sorry you had to agree with me. I must have been bored, to be so repetative. 23. Lokakuu 2004, 05:42:15  I doubt "most" people are "tired of listening to steve whine"... You always do that. You feel a certain way, and try to make it sound like a majority feels the same, even though you have no idea, LJ... There is NO reason for Stevie to be banned! (not this time anyways.. LOL!) :-P 23. Lokakuu 2004, 04:59:58 No, because you would obviously not be onsite :o) 23. Lokakuu 2004, 04:59:37 Well, if you are using auto-vacation and you end up not having to go, none of your games should "time out", and therefore no vacation days should be used. 23. Lokakuu 2004, 04:58:10 Otsikko: So if I set vacation days up. Cause I may have to be gone with my daughter and for some reason I don't have to go, u say that is abuse? 23. Lokakuu 2004, 04:57:18 Somehow I think it will be a no do it anyways 23. Lokakuu 2004, 04:51:00 but who would keep the records though? Thats a lot of work for the players to do really 23. Lokakuu 2004, 04:09:37 Otsikko: Re: BTW up your pimple purple head 23. Lokakuu 2004, 04:04:51 Anyway LJ
This was only a heated discusion. Nothing more, two sides getting their opinions across. Until you came on 23. Lokakuu 2004, 03:44:37 Muokannut Stevie (23. Lokakuu 2004, 03:51:50) I modified it to add flaming LMAO
I couldnt give two hoots if you are getting tired of me whinging. The only problem i have is I say what others think and dont say. So looks like its just me. But it isnt. Whereas the likes of you, you say what you think the boss man wants you to say. cant get much lower can you 23. Lokakuu 2004, 03:33:55 23. Lokakuu 2004, 03:32:11 Once more LJ shows his true self. nose covered in the brown stuff etc. Whats wrong?? you want rid of someone who shows you for what you are???
I see you signed on with both accounts LJ you should shut up and play both sets of games. ooopps sorry, you said its your wife momentarily didnt you before deleting the commenet LOL I guess your post below wont stay long either. 23. Lokakuu 2004, 03:13:14 Otsikko: Re: Stevie and others It is just not a right attitude. Once there is a feature which people do find useful from time to time, it should not be abolished just because some others abuse it. Such an attitude would lead, then, to a "tyranny of the abusers", because BK would be further developed with respect to preventing these from acting abusively and not with respect to helping us all to have a good gameplay.
Do you see my point ? 23. Lokakuu 2004, 03:04:24 I dont think it is that tough to see... If you are away from the site, automatic vacation days to prevent time out is fine. there should be no limit to it, except for the amount of vacation time you have left. If you have logged into the site within 24 hours (or some specific amount of time) of a game being timed out, the Automatic vacation should not be turned on for you.
I think we all agree, it should not be used to add time to a game when a person is available to make a move. 23. Lokakuu 2004, 02:31:21  I agree that auto vacation should not be allowed to be used on games if a person has signed into the account at any period , and even if it does kick in a maximum limit of 2 or 3 days should be allowed . 23. Lokakuu 2004, 02:27:09 Thanks Loup :o)
The diference is BBW to set it manually means they have to go out of their way to do it. Whereas its easy to sit back and let an auto thing kick in 23. Lokakuu 2004, 02:21:56  but the thing is, even without auto vacation, that same person can hold up the tournament for over a month. 23. Lokakuu 2004, 02:20:20 hear hear. Finishing the tournament is the fun part. If you time out for whatever reason then enter the next one. It's not the end of the world. 23. Lokakuu 2004, 02:18:57 Otsikko: scooby and others Most of the time Stevie and I don't see things the same way. But on this auto vacation crap. I do have to say Stevie is saying most everything I think is right on it.
So on the 1 or 2 day tourney, if a person has not takin 1 vacation day all year they could hold a tourney to make it last for 1 turn over a month. Yes as it is now that the way the rules have it but is it really being a true sport about the game? ok puff back to my corner I pop. :o{P 23. Lokakuu 2004, 01:49:33 I dont want to talk to you. Ive been warned things 23. Lokakuu 2004, 01:44:42 Scooby, Im sure youll be told..."get a membership" so you can have more games etc. But thats not the answer is it ;o)LOL 23. Lokakuu 2004, 01:42:19 especially annoying when its against a pawn :( It would only need 1 player to do this and hold up a tournament we are in for ex. Or 20 players to do it and we have no games to play 23. Lokakuu 2004, 01:16:59 hence..the words abused upchuck
but i dont think its worth mentioning anymore cos obviously the managements minds are made up 23. Lokakuu 2004, 01:03:07 One point not yet mentioned (I think) is that these people are not away with an emergency, they are here...
I like auto vacations too, for emergency use. But maybe it could be set to only work if a player is not on the site? If they are here and purposly not playing games that are due to time out, the auto vacation should not be kicked in. Personally, I dont think any vacation days should be valid if the person is on site. If you can accept a 5 day limit game, and you are able to get on site, you should have to play your games at that limit, period. 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:22:26 and of course you are right ;o)
nice when goal posts allways move isnt it :o( 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:21:12  I've never said I have a great memory! Feature requests is just that. People suggest things, Fencer & Liquid add what they like. I don't remember many objections if this was mentioned at features? I could be wrong though so don't jump on me for that one! I think most people would be glad of this if they ever needed to fall back on auto-vation. As was said earlier, for the majority its a great addition. Of course there are always a few who will abuse it, as with anything. But overall, it will benefit most people. 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:17:42 On the other hand, won't the auto-vacation feature make players more willing to play 1-day-per-move games, hence resulting in faster game play? 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:15:50 nope, i remember the suggestions made on feature board 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:15:05 Yes, a chosen few wanted it. Fencer and Liquid. And last time I looked, they don't have to ask anyone before adding every small detail to their site! 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:12:32 Otsikko: Nobody is dictating to you. The rules have been set, you have to learn to live with them. no one dictating???
So were we all asked if we wanted this addition? or did just a chosen couple want it, so hey presto 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:12:26 Because, Stevie, even people who want to abuse the auto-vaction can only do it 30 times! And then they lose all their vacation days, and they can't avoid timing out, and if they want to go away they won't be able to set any more days. 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:11:16 Quick players club is a joke now. When super slow players are in, knowing full well it is for fast players only and when confronted on it keep playing more games meant for fast players yet take a week or more to move! 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:08:10 most rules are ok though. game time is a rule. why have it now? no one is answering that 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:07:41 and in the quick message answering club :) 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:07:28 indeed i am (in quick players club).
I am not losing sleep over it, just bringing up the point that these rules can easily be abused. 22. Lokakuu 2004, 20:05:26 Nobody is dictating to you. The rules have been set, you have to learn to live with them.
grenv, you seem to have a genuine problem with this. It seems you've already contacted the person who is holding your games up, I'm sorry but if they won't move any faster there isn't much you can do except try to avoid these people in the future. Are you in the Quick players club? The people there generally move fast. << < 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 > >> |
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
|
|
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. Takaisin alkuun |