Käyttäjätunnus: Salasana:
Uuden käyttäjän rekisteröinti
Valvoja(t): Gabriel Almeida , david upshaw 
 Checkers

Discuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers.


Viestejä per sivu:
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas.
Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
Etsi viesteistä:  

<< <   15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24   > >>
9. Elokuu 2005, 00:27:40
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Re: Positions..
see.. what'd I tell ya!! haha.. you go boy!! whooo hooo..

8. Elokuu 2005, 18:04:18
bwildman 
Otsikko: Re:
John Baker: that makes sense.

8. Elokuu 2005, 18:01:57
John Baker 
Otsikko: Re:
bwildman: He's most likely talking individual moves, and then only from the "losing move" they had been discussing. That way, 131 sounds about right.
There were 148 total moves in the game (74x2) and 131 moves back must have been the move in question.

8. Elokuu 2005, 17:51:09
bwildman 
Otsikko: Re:
Pedro Martínez: 131 moves?
that game went 74..am I missing something?

8. Elokuu 2005, 17:42:00
CurrentRiver 
Otsikko: Re:
Grim Reaper: Wow and Wow!!!!!! I had no ideal. :o)

8. Elokuu 2005, 15:40:13
bwildman 
Otsikko: Re: Ustica and the points
Pedro Martínez: duh..LOL..my bad..I should have said"end games"

8. Elokuu 2005, 15:36:38
Pedro Martínez 
Otsikko: Re: Ustica and the points
bwildman: There are three possible outcomes in a game of checkers.

8. Elokuu 2005, 13:33:53
bwildman 
Otsikko: Re: Ustica and the points
Grim Reaper: how many possible outcomes are there in a game of checkers?
I only ask you this,because I know you have written checker programs for several years now.

8. Elokuu 2005, 13:28:47
bwildman 
Otsikko: Re:
ScarletRose: isnt he just simply AmaZing??? LOL..I wonder if Purple is taking bets on the game of the century?

8. Elokuu 2005, 07:19:37
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Re:
Socrates: Maybe he is a genius and no one wants to accept it.. haha..

He is a kewl dude actually.. he fools you all! :) Makes you think he is a meanie..

Hey Ed.. how's life? And I wonder why I don't play checkers with him.. haha

8. Elokuu 2005, 05:31:57
BlitzMe 
Congratulations on being the greatest online checkers player, Grim Reaper.

8. Elokuu 2005, 05:28:37
THE HIT MAN 
Otsikko: Re: Ustica and the points
Purple: where are u playing it bud

8. Elokuu 2005, 04:16:36
bwildman 
Otsikko: Re: Ustica and the points
Purple: how many times have you beat GR?

8. Elokuu 2005, 04:12:30
Purple 
Otsikko: Re: Ustica and the points
Grim Reaper: I can see one move ahead maybe..so what do I know? LOL. But I have played Ustica 100 times in the last 4 years with zero wins. As I said it looks like a close game.

8. Elokuu 2005, 03:58:29
Purple 
Otsikko: Re:
Grim Reaper: That was impressive by any standard. Thanks.

8. Elokuu 2005, 03:52:09
Purple 
Otsikko: Re:
Socrates: I see a close game but I'll take Ustica and the points. LOL

8. Elokuu 2005, 03:48:18
ustica tnp 
Otsikko: Re:
Pedro Martínez: WOW!!can predict 131 moves. must be the best. like in chess ,in 4 games was #1. WOW!! Congrats

8. Elokuu 2005, 03:11:12
BlitzMe 
Maybe Ed Trice is the greatest player in the world :)

8. Elokuu 2005, 02:10:44
Pedro Martínez 
So, the game is over. Grim Reaper has won. Amazing how someone can predict a loss/win in 131 moves (I mean this). Congrats

7. Elokuu 2005, 19:21:25
Pedro Martínez 
For anyone interested, it's this game:
http://brainking.com/cz/ShowGame?g=967503

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:44:59
Pedro Martínez 
Otsikko: Re:
Grim Reaper: OK. Thanks.

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:44:09
Purple 
Otsikko: Re:
Grim Reaper: Fair offer. Do it that way.

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:41:29
Grim Reaper 
Pedro, if you do not think it is a losing move, challenge me to a rated game, and play it. I will play the other side.

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:40:29
Grim Reaper 
The piece that would have moved from 24 to 28 is now off the board, and cannot influence the play whatsoever.

That subgame, by defintion, cannot possibly occur in this game, since it is impossible to create any such position from the parent game with an extra piece on the board.

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:38:23
Pedro Martínez 
Does anybody else think that the "24-28" is not a losing move?

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:37:23
Purple 
Otsikko: Re:
Pedro Martínez: If it looks like it is impacting THIS game your post will be deleted whether you think it is nonsense or not.

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:33:01
Pedro Martínez 
Excuse me but that's a total nonsense what you wrote. I want to discuss a theoretical game that has absolutely no connection to the game these two are playing since it's already a completely different game. All I want to figure out is if Trice would have lost the game if he had moved 9.b6-a7. That's it. Absolutely no connection whatsoever to the ongoing game.

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:20:50
Purple 
Otsikko: Re:
Pedro Martínez: It seems hard to discuss the move that was not made without bringing in the move that was and how future moves were/are impacted by that.

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:16:11
Pedro Martínez 
Otsikko: Re:
Purple: I'm talking about a move that was NOT played. Trice didn't move that way. I don't care about the game they play right now, I want to discuss the "24-28" move.

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:12:24
Purple 
Otsikko: Re:
Pedro Martínez: If the chat gets more detailed and someone suggests a course of action for a next move or even a strategy then someone could yell "foul." Analyze away..I do..but be careful about the posting because we don't want to provide excuses. The game is one on one.

7. Elokuu 2005, 18:06:19
Pedro Martínez 
Otsikko: Re:
Purple: What problem?

7. Elokuu 2005, 17:55:28
Purple 
Otsikko: Re:
Pedro Martínez: There could be a problem analyzing moves of a game in progress as tempting as it is.

7. Elokuu 2005, 17:27:04
Pedro Martínez 
Does anybody else think that the "24-28" is not a losing move?

7. Elokuu 2005, 17:15:14
BuilderQ 
Otsikko: Re:
Grim Reaper: As for the numeric notation, have you noticed this Settings page?

7. Elokuu 2005, 14:48:39
Purple 
Otsikko: One More Day- Request Invite

7. Elokuu 2005, 14:20:18
gooner 
and we miss all the juicy chat lol

7. Elokuu 2005, 13:34:32
redsales 
Otsikko: Re:
gooner: i agree. serial unposting should be a crime..!

7. Elokuu 2005, 08:55:38
Pedro Martínez 
Otsikko: Re:
Grim Reaper: One look? I can stare at that move forever and don't see it as a losing one. I actually think it's not a bad move at all.

7. Elokuu 2005, 08:15:48
Grim Reaper 
Otsikko: Re:
ustica:

Take a chance? Translation. Lie about the move and see if your opponent believes you.

Sorry pal, one look at "24-28" (by the way, why did you say that instead of refer to the letters on the board on BrainKing? Oh, that's right, computer programs have numbers on them, don't they?) and I knew that was a losing move.

7. Elokuu 2005, 08:11:58
ustica tnp 
Otsikko: Re:
Grim Reaper: I was wonder if you use 3 program or just one. but hey! if you wanna win you gotta take chance.

7. Elokuu 2005, 08:04:05
Grim Reaper 
Muokannut Grim Reaper (7. Elokuu 2005, 08:05:25)
http://brainking.com/en/ShowGame?g=952957&i=16

I direct everyone's attention to the above position. After I made my move, my opponent, Ustica, made this remark to me in our game:

ustica: ustica: (7. August 2005, 01:48:33)
if i was white i do 24-28 not 1-6 you like publesh moves. oh well just my opion.


On our board, 1-6 is g1-f2 and 24-28 is b6-a7. The move the "great" ustica is trying to tell me to play will lose.

I am wondering, if he is so good, why doesn't he know this? Does he actually think he can persuade me to make a losing move.

What a great champion he is.

6. Elokuu 2005, 23:53:00
BlitzMe 
Otsikko: Games
Will players invite me to some checker games?

6. Elokuu 2005, 21:27:25
Purple 
Otsikko: Re: Checkers 10 piece database
Grim Reaper: Very impressive though the computer talk was way over my head.

6. Elokuu 2005, 21:23:16
Purple 
Otsikko: Maybe Obsolete Info

6. Elokuu 2005, 07:46:29
Grim Reaper 
Otsikko: Checkers 10 piece database
Kingsrow has the 10-piece database now.

http://pages.prodigy.net/eyg/Checkers/10-pieceBuild.htm

3. Elokuu 2005, 19:32:39
gooner 

3. Elokuu 2005, 19:20:29
Purple 
Otsikko: Re:
Muokannut Purple (4. Elokuu 2005, 15:41:01)
gooner: Any missing posts were removed by the poster. (unless a Global Mod came in)

3. Elokuu 2005, 19:09:43
gooner 
Its confusing when posts are missing :o)

1. Elokuu 2005, 11:11:57
harley 
Something us non-perfect humanoids experience on occasion. I'll try to explain better for you super-humans!

1. Elokuu 2005, 11:01:17
harley 
Maybe not 50/50, but you're not allowing for human error. Ratings are only a guide. I've beaten people in games with much higher ratings than me - and people with much lower ratings than me have won games after I made a bad move. It happens.

<< <   15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24   > >>
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
Takaisin alkuun