Käyttäjätunnus: Salasana:
Uuden käyttäjän rekisteröinti
Valvoja(t): Chaos 
 Espionage

For all Espionage fans


Viestejä per sivu:
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas.
Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
Etsi viesteistä:  

<< <   1 2   > >>
12. Lokakuu 2004, 18:44:22
Thad 
Otsikko: Re: volcanos
Muokannut Thad (12. Lokakuu 2004, 20:22:24)
The volcanos are always placed symetrically so that each player has them in the same positions. There are 10 squares in which they can be placed (in any of the ten squares in the row on 'your' half of the board farthest from the edge). The formula for the number of ways to choose two squares out of ten is 10!/(10-2)!x2! = 10x9/2 = 45 ways.

12. Lokakuu 2004, 12:19:05
Thad 
Otsikko: Missing volcanoes in archived games
I think the volcanoes are missing in archived games.

11. Lokakuu 2004, 20:34:58
Thad 
Otsikko: Re: saved boards
Muokannut Thad (11. Lokakuu 2004, 20:35:26)
Good point, but for casual play against different opponents, it can be a great feature. Also, the problem you mention exists now the way things are. Also, I usually load a saved board and change just a couple of things. Makes it different enough to keep my opponents guessing without making me start from scratch each time. ;-)

11. Lokakuu 2004, 07:57:08
Thad 
Otsikko: Re: saved boards
Ok, then is anyone else interested in seeing this added as a new feature too? ;-)

11. Lokakuu 2004, 07:25:48
Thad 
Otsikko: saved boards
Shouldn't we be able to save boards in both Fast Espionage and regular Espionage and use them in either game? I couldn't figure out how to do it if you can.

7. Lokakuu 2004, 01:08:15
Thad 
Otsikko: Add to rules for Small Espionage?
It would be nice to see the exact list of pieces for small Espionage. I know we start with 20 guys, but it wold be nice to have them listed. That way, in the middle of a game, I could just click on the rules link to recall what I started with!!

Also, we really need a captured pieces section like in chess.

Thanks,
Thad

29. Syyskuu 2004, 01:16:52
Thad 
Otsikko: after an attack...
After I attack an opponent's piece and lose, shouldn't I know the rank of that piece? Shouldn't the "?" be relplaced by the piece's actual value?

<< <   1 2   > >>
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
Takaisin alkuun