Käyttäjätunnus: Salasana:
Uuden käyttäjän rekisteröinti
Valvoja(t): WhisperzQ , Nightstorm 
 Chess variants (6x6)

Chess variants on a 6x6 board, in particular Los Alamos Chess.

For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go directly to Los Alamos Chess).
- information about upcoming tournaments
- discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


Viestejä per sivu:
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas.
Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
Etsi viesteistä:  

29. Syyskuu 2005, 11:07:30
Mirjam 
What a tiny, nice game:) Thanks Fencer!

29. Syyskuu 2005, 14:36:02
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re:
Mirjam: I hope more people will find it interesting :-)

29. Syyskuu 2005, 16:44:30
chessik 
Yeah,this is very interesting game,but I made one mistake and game is in **** :),This game need tactic and I think luck too..

29. Syyskuu 2005, 17:01:13
Mirjam 
luck?!?

29. Syyskuu 2005, 17:21:09
Mirjam 
I haven't solved it yet;)

1. Lokakuu 2005, 02:11:49
Thad 
Otsikko: solved status vs popularity
Just because this game may be solved doesn't mean people won't like it. Five-in-line is one of the most popular game here and it is solved (I am told).

6. Marraskuu 2005, 04:38:33
Thad 
Otsikko: Advantage?
Hmm,

White won 325 (49 %)
Black won 287 (43 %)
Draws 56 (8 %)

Is there an advantage in going first?

10. Marraskuu 2005, 09:15:18
BlitzMe 
If it is solved this presents a problem :) If it is solved, is the program available for the public? This would be tragic :(

10. Marraskuu 2005, 10:54:54
BlitzMe 
Otsikko: Re: Advantage?
Muokannut BlitzMe (10. Marraskuu 2005, 10:55:36)
Thad: Since I was asked to play in the Los Alamos team tournament for The Untouchables, I have been studying this game for a while. I think that white has a big advantage going first because I feel they can control the center much easier than in 8x8 chess and I think center control is more important in this game rather than 8x8. And moving first = opportunity to control center first. Those statistics don't really say white has a blatant advantage but after a month of studying openings in Los Alamos, I would rather be white in every game if it was possible!

8. Tammikuu 2006, 05:07:46
Nightstorm 
Fencer, This game looks like it might be a good addition to the 6x6 games.

Mini Burmese Chess

3. Maaliskuu 2006, 12:40:32
Liontamer 
Otsikko: Congratulations (final version)
Muokannut Liontamer (4. Maaliskuu 2006, 04:28:27)
I would like to express my sincere admiration for Bigboulix who has regained first rank in Los Alamos Chess by beating sasufix, a former solid 1900 player, in seven consecutive games within less than 24 hours! All seven games are great steps ahead in the elaboration of Los Alamos opening theory as well as in the development of tactical and strategic patterns of this variant.

My personal favourite is this little gem, which clearly shows the superior understanding of the game by Bigboulix:

Game No. 6

But all games are worth to be replayed:

Game No. 1

Game No. 2

Game No. 3

Game No. 4

Game No. 5

Game No. 7

I'm glad that this happened while my games vs. sasufix are still in progress, so that I don't gain unjustified rating points from a player who had an unjustified 1900+ BKR and now shows that he is worth only 1700+. This provides an excellent incentive to play for a win now, because a draw against such a weak player will rightfully cost me some BKR points.

***Edited to correct links at Liontamers request***

4. Maaliskuu 2006, 16:11:09
Pedro Martínez 
Otsikko: Re: Congratulations (final version)
Liontamer: Well, together with robtoo, Bigboulix is the best of the best on this site, and I believe that not only here. He has a great "insight" into the essence of all the games he plays, no matter whether it is Los Alamos Chess or Hyper Backgammon.

4. Maaliskuu 2006, 16:22:23
Bwild 
Otsikko: Re: Congratulations (final version)
Pedro Martínez: there are alot of multi-talented players here, including yourself, Pedro.
its the best thing about BrainKing.

23. Syyskuu 2006, 10:48:01
Bughunter42 
Otsikko: Piece value
I've got a question to the more experienced players of Los Alamos Chess. I'm relatively new at this kind of game, so I don't have good understanding of it (playing it only just for fun).

In my opinion, in Los Alamos Chess pawns are stronger than in normal chess, because the board is smaller (-> faster promotion of pawns -> faster control of board), and pawns have to do the the job of the missing bishops (e.g.covering the diagonals).

So I'm interested if I'm wrong with this idea, that there is a movement of strength of the pieces to normal chess, or if it is only theoretical and isn't noticealbe while playing game.

Thanks for your answers!

23. Syyskuu 2006, 18:13:21
andreas 
Otsikko: Re: Piece value
FromHell: Zillions-of-Games uses the following piece values (roundig to the first digit after the point):

pawn: 1.0
knight: 2.5
rook: 3.8
queen: 5.9

24. Syyskuu 2006, 07:35:47
WhisperzQ 
Otsikko: Re: Piece value
FromHell: i have not played many games but am yet to play in one wehre a pawn was promoted ... but I would agree that the pawn is more powerful, not just becuse it promotes fast beut it controls a higher percdntage of the board than in normal chess (a central pawn controls 1/18th of hte board here whereas in normal chess it only controls 1/32nd ... nearly twice the power) likewise knights centrally control 8/36, nearly a quarter of the board whereas rooks will only control 10/36ths. This is a simplistic appraisla but you can see where it leads.

There has been much discussion on peice values in the 10x8 thread over the years, including methods for determining the values. you might find it interesting to read through there ... you could try a search using "piece value".

Cheers

WQ :)

24. Syyskuu 2006, 10:05:18
Bughunter42 
Otsikko: Re: Piece value
WhisperzQ: Thanks for your quick answer. Your kind of view to this problem seems logical to me. That far I haven't thought... And thanks for the hint with the 10x8 board. I'll have a look at it!

andreas: Thanks for the values. For the first time it's a good guidline. But do you know how this values are acquired?

24. Syyskuu 2006, 14:05:54
WhisperzQ 
Otsikko: Re: Piece value
FromHell: Looks like I need a spellchecker and proof reader too ... glad you could understand it :)

1. Tammikuu 2007, 22:35:55
Seravajan 
Otsikko: Advantage?
Interesting:

White won 325 (49 %)
Black won 287 (43 %)
Draws 56 (8 %)

That I lose most games with white due forced moves.

24. Joulukuu 2008, 15:14:05
aliha 
Otsikko: Re: Advantage?
Seravajan: hello

27. Maaliskuu 2009, 07:42:32
ughaibu 
Is stalemate a loss for the mated player?

27. Maaliskuu 2009, 13:46:59
Bwild 
Otsikko: Re:
ughaibu: I always thought it was a draw

27. Maaliskuu 2009, 16:04:30
AbigailII 
Otsikko: Re:
ughaibu: The rules say:

All standard Chess rules are applied with the following exceptions:
  • Pawns cannot make a double-step initial move.
  • There is no castling.
  • There is no en-passant capture.
which seems pretty clear to me.

29. Maaliskuu 2009, 05:54:39
ughaibu 
Thanks.

Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
Takaisin alkuun