They are ........"The management"

LOL

Stevie..arent they the "Brains of Brain King"?
U have any better names?

I agree with bwild harley... The members of this site do need to know if what it members are doing is acceptable, and if so is it acceptable for everyone, or are there special circumstances, or is it unacceptable. I personally am tired of hearing about it, and dont really care who has what accounts, or how they got them....but it is not going to go away until Fencer does something to make it go away.

There already is one. It's called The Cave.

With those three as jury, id be spending a fortune :o(

Me thinks a Bad behavior board is a brilliant idea.
Every week end a jury (Fencer, Harley and Kevin) decide who is the a-h off the week and he/she has to pay $ 25 as penalty.

Well..i thought (still do) that a-pass is brilliant too :(

Thats right id 7929 and 8129

I have the cahoonies to not lie about them :o)

big difference,longjohn...those accounts werent boosted by a prize tourny.

you mean Connor and Glenda?
LOL

pimple can moderate the "bad behaviour" board....he knows all about what it feels like to be banned for CHEATING!!

Family accounts Purple :o)
Just like the saprano's on here LOL

ooops sh...... oh pooh, sorry ;o)

Laughing at serious posts is very bad behavior Stevie!!! :)

LMAO

Why not a board called "Bad behavior".

There could all members who dont follow the rules be "nailed"..for example for using bad language, multiple accounts and of course the worse "crime" of all.. requesting auto-pass :)

I'm afraid I have to disagree.As a feature of BrainKing.com....only ONE account is allowed.unless I'm mistaken...this also has to do with the structure of BrainKig.com.
If one person is allowed to fool people and take advantage of the good will of prize tournies,designed to SUPPORT BRAINKING......then be kept "hush hush"...why not let everybody CHEAT!!!!

IMupChucKing and anyone else who has posted about this - I feel it is a matter that should be dealt with in private between LongJohn and Fencer. It certainly isn't a matter for this board. Whatever Fencer is doing about it doesn't need to be broadcast for public interest. I would appreciate no more posts about this matter. Thank you.

will you please do us all a favor, and weigh in publicly on the Long John / qwerty girl situation? It would be nice to put that subject to rest, one way or another...Thanks!

Good points Kevin... also, total number of moves definitly should not be used.....

nother unsuggested idead is to measure it by the amount of people who will sign up for a non prize tournament, that seems to be a good indicator of popularity.

The backgammon first roll bug is quite a problem. I've swapped dice and now the machine thinks I've lost the roll but if I pass the game to my opponent they'll probably also want to swap the dice and the whole palaver will continue ad infinitum.

It was missing yesterday.

You have 289 new messages in your message box!
mines still there , must be your account .

say, is it just me, or are "new message" alerts gone from the top of everybody's main page?

i only see the red number next to my message box now when i have new messages...and sometimes that's off the screen...i'd like my big "you have (x) new messages!" headline back... :)

thank you and filed away for future reference :)

Thank you Bwildman :) and you will notice that again ....NO ANSWER

I think 12x12 is a good size - if you make the board too small the skill involved decreases and the board layout (luck) plays a bigger part in it.

Number of moves would naturally be higher in longer (frequently a larger number of moves) games, and started and completed games will naturally be lower for longer games (for example, backgammon and Spider Line4 are shorter games, and checkers and froglet are longer games). I would say the number of players with either a provisional or established rating (or a certain number of completed games) - that's what they use on GoldToken.

I could be wrong, but I don't think it's a hint.. I think he is saying that he didn't say Froglet would surpass backgammon by next week. Perhaps further down the road..
I took it as a hint at first as well! I thought maybe a smaller board would be coming.. (I agree that the 12x12 might be too big)

What didn't you say would happen next week?

Oh wait... it's a hint!

I didn't say it would happen next week :-D

It would be very hard to outgrow backgammon for 2 main reasons:

1) Board is too big / Game is too long. Some people will play fewer games since it takes longer to complete. If for example there were 6x6 or 8x8 versions of the game (would have to think more about what would be best) - but with a 12x12 board - it will lose some players.

2) Backgammon is a classic popular games which many knows how to play. Froglet is a new unheard of game which only some players will try (and if they don't catch on, may quit before playing any more games.)

BUT Froglet will get the type of people who like the "outbreak" type games on that other GT game site, so that is a plus.

I usually go on game rules and see the number of finished games to judge popularity. But I guess it could be measured by any of those :o) And I think froglet might just outgrow backgammon!

Froglet won't outnumber Backgammon... my guess is it will grow just a little faster then Battleboats Plus - and probable settle in there around the Backgammon Race or Crowded Backgammon level in it's popularity. (again, just my guess.) :-)

I've always kind of measured it by the number of people who have a established rating. But then it is hard to judge games which have not been here for awhile - so then it would probable have to be something based on started games or something

I will probably add it to Statistics page.
Because I want to see how quickly can Froglet outnumber Backgammon :-D

Maybe all of those criteria? Games that are high in most of those categories are obviously the most popular?

How would you measure a game popularity? Number of started games, number of finished games, total number of played moves, finished games per day, number of players who played at least 10 games of this type?

LongJohn opened the QWERTY girl account and joined a pawn tournament and won. Then he accepted a knight membership for his second (bogus) account.

This is not speculation on my part. LJ told me this himself and proved it to me. I'm not the only one that knows about this. I thought that was against BK user agreement (not to mention the fraud of accepting a membership prize for a prohibited second account).

You might have to start a new one...

ok, i added the teams..but I can't seem to add them to the tournament. Is there any way to do so or do I have to start a new one?

duh! thanks harley!

redsales, it was for your fellowship wasn't it? I just created the new games at HOME and they went through fine. Have you created teams for these games? That could be the problem.

Possible bug or my stupidity: i just created a tourney with all games but couldn't seem to add the new ones because they weren't given as an option to be checked. Bug or dumb me?

I'm glad you brought this subject up,LongJohn.
I'm wondering,how any self respecting member here could morally allow another member to pay for a membership for a multi nic? I dont think a member of this caliber has any right to ask about anther members activities.Do you?

A support, maybe?

If someone wanted to quit, why would they extend their membership to March 2005?
Is there a refund policy?

ARE BACK!!!! (Thanks Fencer!)

And first victim - erm - interviewee - will be... *drum roll please* .....

BIG BAD WOLF!!!

I'm going to start off with a completely clean sheet so there are NO old questions stored. Anyone who wants the same questions asked at each interview, send me them again. Any question you would like put to BBW, send it to me, and please add if its ok to use your name with the question. Some people like to stay anonymous and if you don't tell me I won't know!

Thanks Fencer and Sinay. That's excellent.

Blaze

Big chances. Sinay already made smaller board pieces for Alquerque, I will try to add them tonight.

Does anyone else find the graphics on Alquerque take a while to load? I'm on a 150kb modem, and use 1024 x 768 pixels screen definition, but the game board takes much longer to load than any of the other games and the actual board itself seems quite a bit larger.

Fencer, I love the new games! Any chance the Alquerque and Jarmo board graphics could be made smaller for faster loading times?

Blaze

Linda, you gave me a list of questions and said "please include them with every interview". I didn't go through them all each time to see how appropriate they were to each person being interviewed. I had a template with questions people had asked me to include on each one (that would normally be appropriate no matter who it was) and I built off that for new questions I received.

I've just published everything I'd received.
But I think the problem is that some people had created "universal questions" for all future interviews.