Käyttäjätunnus: Salasana:
Uuden käyttäjän rekisteröinti
Valvoja(t): Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Viestejä per sivu:
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Ratsu.
Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
Etsi viesteistä:  

<< <   497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506   > >>
15. Marraskuu 2004, 10:53:40
Hrqls 
thanks

15. Marraskuu 2004, 10:51:41
Fencer 
Send them to info@brainking.com. 40x50 and 200x300 pixels.

15. Marraskuu 2004, 10:48:56
Hrqls 
Otsikko: rookie questions : image
- how can i get an image next to my name ?
- how can i have a second image under image in my profile which will show up via javascript ?

14. Marraskuu 2004, 21:39:02
BuilderQ 
My line4 rating never increases by more than 8 points, so it is stable. But I can get those 8 points from a win against a 2000 player or a 2300+ player, it makes no difference.

If there were all these fractional points that I am getting, sometimes I should get +9?

And the game with TheBig O that I mentioned was Spider Line4, played when my rating was provisional.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 21:32:53
coan.net 
It also looks like you have already played over 130 games, which will also make your rating more stable (Will not fluxuate as much).

Sprayman already played about 40 games, so it should fluxuate a little more then you, but with a draw - it would be a lot less - very possible under 1 rating point of flux.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 21:30:19
Pedro Martínez 
357 is not enough. You would lose at least one point if sprayman's rating was below 1800 or so.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 21:29:21
BuilderQ 
Otsikko: Or how about this:
"The game is a draw.

BuilderQ: old BKR = 2061, new BKR = 2061 (0)
TheBig O: old BKR = 2430, new BKR = 2430 (0)"

14. Marraskuu 2004, 21:22:43
BuilderQ 
Otsikko: Re: Ratings
"The game is a draw.

BuilderQ: old BKR = 2319, new BKR = 2319 (0)
sprayman: old BKR = 1962, new BKR = 1962 (0)"

With this sort of rating difference, how could our ratings only change by fractions?

14. Marraskuu 2004, 21:18:43
coan.net 
Otsikko: Re: Ratings
BuilderQ - point 4

14. Marraskuu 2004, 21:16:47
Pedro Martínez 
BuilderQ: What is "hundreds"?

14. Marraskuu 2004, 21:10:54
BuilderQ 
Otsikko: Re: Ratings
Why is it that I can draw rated games with players rated hundreds of points above or below me, without either my rating, or my opponent's rating, changing? Which of BBW's points explains that?

14. Marraskuu 2004, 20:44:45
Pafl 
Otsikko: Re: Ratings
"easy to understand" is not a quality of the rating formula ... rather of the one who uses it LOL
No, sorry, I do not understand it either :-) ... but I think the BK formula works well ... if you go through BBW's points carefully, you will find answers to all that doesn't seem "reasonable" to you ...

14. Marraskuu 2004, 20:29:16
BuilderQ 
Otsikko: Ratings
Why doesn't BrainKing use a simpler rating formula, which produces reasonable results while being easy to understand? See http://www.uschess.org/cc/ccratefl.php

14. Marraskuu 2004, 19:21:09
mal4inara 
Otsikko: Re: time zones
You are right, that we are GMT +13 so doesn't work for NZ. Our daylight savings time changed beginning of October, when we put clocks forward an hour. Just means I have to remember that when the clock says 11pm it really is midnight lol.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 19:18:32
Pedro Martínez 
Otsikko: mamba
Muokannut Pedro Martínez (14. Marraskuu 2004, 19:19:27)
Here you can find the formula according to which the BKRs are counted:

http://math.bu.edu/people/mg/ratings/approx/approx.html

14. Marraskuu 2004, 19:16:50
coan.net 
Otsikko: Rating Overview
1st: "unrated" players actually have ratings - just you don't see them until 4 games are played.

2nd: Ratings takes many things to figure a rating: Your rating, your oppenets ratings, how many games you played, and how many games your oppenent played.

3rd: Until 25 games are played (Well actually until 100+ games are played), ratings will fluxuate a lot. That is why it is a "provisional" rating until 25 games are played. I actually heard it can take up to 400 games before a rating is actually set pretty well.

4th: Even if you don't see ratings change, it may change. For example, before a game it may be 1500.1, then after the game it could be 1500.4 - but since you only see the "1500", it looks like it does not change... even though it does.

5th: How the formula works, it is even possible to lose points when you win! (When you don't have many games played, etc...) But I believe Fencer made it so you never lose points for a win, so at those times your rating will actually stay the same.

Anyway, in short - ratings will do very funny things until you get many games under your belt. At least 25 games, but probable more then 100 games is needed before your ratings will settle down.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 18:57:47
Joseph S 
i see no reason to play higher rated players anymore if i'll get more points playing beginners that are unrated...i'll take an easy win for twice as many points anyday....

14. Marraskuu 2004, 18:40:09
Joseph S 
Otsikko: Re: about points again
but i beat the higher rated players and got nothing like what somebody got against me and i wasn't even rated....you don't understand...in frogs i did win games against the higher rated players and only got anywhere from 15 to 18 points...i play a game of anti-frogs and lost and they get 38 points..!!....i didn't even have a rating in anti-frogs why did they get sooo many points but i play the better players at regular frogs and get a pittance of points when i win aginst good players...why did somebody get 38 points for winning against an unrated player but when i win against somebody rated # 7 or 8 i get not even half that many points....WHY..!!??

14. Marraskuu 2004, 17:02:04
BuilderQ 
Otsikko: Re: about points again
The rating system's great, I can draw a game with someone rated 357 points below me and not lose any points!

14. Marraskuu 2004, 16:49:27
pauloaguia 
Otsikko: Re: about points again
Mamba: that's the general idea behind the rating system: you get more points if you beat higher rated players. higher rated players are (suposedly)harder to beat, so when you win a game against one, you get a bigger reward. Makes sense, no?
Also, if you are 400 points behind and win a game against a big player, you'll get more points then if you're ratings are similar.

Of course there are other factors like number of games played and I think the formula is different if it's an established rating or a provisional one. But the general idea is the same.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 14:02:34
Joseph S 
Otsikko: about points again
i won a game with Diogenes..i got 17 points
i won a game with Hanis...i got 18 points
both of these players had over a 2000 rating at the frog game when i won...
anybody i win a game with playing frogs that's below 1500 in points i get 0 points...now why did somebody get 38 points when they won agame with me at anti-frog..???.. me an unrated player at anti-frog..38 points..!!!...i'm sorry but i just don't think the points are being dished out fairly here.....also...now that i'm talking points.....when the site fried in october of 2003 and we were all assured that our points and ratings would be reinstated if we sent a message about what our scores were....and to go ahead and resign games we previsiouly had won ..well when you readjusted the points last week you must have forgotten all that because i now have losses for the games i resigned that i wouldn't have resiged if i wasn't assured all was ok....

14. Marraskuu 2004, 13:05:40
Chessmaster1000 
Otsikko: Re: time zones
I think New Zealand is +12 GMT/UTC with fixes according to DST.
So now it's +13 GMT/UTC.......

14. Marraskuu 2004, 11:56:07
rabbitoid 
you can always set your clock to GMT-11 and tell your computer he's got the date wrong :)

14. Marraskuu 2004, 11:34:47
harley 
Otsikko: Interview with...
....................BAD BISHOP!!

Send me your questions for BadBishop! Hurry up, time is running out! See your question among the others and lets get another interesting interview!

14. Marraskuu 2004, 11:21:32
Stevie 
I always thought the All Blacks were rather forward LOL

14. Marraskuu 2004, 11:21:07
myfanwy 
....I think!

14. Marraskuu 2004, 11:20:18
myfanwy 
Otsikko: Re: time zones
But New Zealand is +13 GMT. It is half an hour away from the 15th.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 09:39:42
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re: time zones
The dropdown list contains all zones from GMT -12:00 to GMT +12:00. It must work for everyone.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 09:21:57
mal4inara 
Otsikko: Re: time zones
unfortunately that doesn't work for us in New Zealand, have it set at the furtherest time but still shows one hour behind what the time actually is, no other options after that.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 08:57:40
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re: time zones
Bernice: Then set the next time zone. Names of cities are just as a hint, the time shift value is more important.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 08:55:31
Bernice 
Otsikko: time zones
BK has time zones with Brisbane, Sydney, Vladisvostok (sp) as the same time....

at the moment Sydney is ONE HOUR ahead of brisbane and will be for the next 6 months...can this be rectified?

14. Marraskuu 2004, 08:48:36
Fencer 
Mamba: There is no jackpot, the formula works in this way.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 07:27:41
Bernice 
so what is the use of having people on enemies if you dont want them to know what you are doing...or is being on enemies only to stop the"enemy" from PMing?.

I dont currently have anyone on enemies...been a long time since that happened LOLOL

14. Marraskuu 2004, 07:24:36
Kevin 
Muokannut Kevin (14. Marraskuu 2004, 07:24:55)
Yes. It has the dot beside players on your enemies list as well.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 07:21:28
Bernice 
Otsikko: thanks Kevin
"Do I see a dot beside their name?"

14. Marraskuu 2004, 07:20:02
Kevin 
Bernice: Do you mean "Do they see a dot beside my name?" or "Do I see a dot beside their name?"

Mamba: The amount of points gained or lost is mostly dependent on the two ratings. Even unrated players actually have a rating, it is just not displayed. So they might have a very high rating or a very low rating, both affecting your rating very differently.

14. Marraskuu 2004, 07:13:31
Bernice 
Otsikko: Silly Q?
if i have someone on enemies, and Im actually playing a game with them..does the little green dot appear by their name? or are they hidden because i have them on enemies?

see i told you it was a silly Q LOLOL

14. Marraskuu 2004, 00:59:39
Joseph S 
Otsikko: question about the ratings here
i have a question about how the points are given for a rating....i've played unrated players at froglet and get maybe 4 or 5 points if i win ...i just lost a game of anti-frog and the other person got 38 points....how is this big of a difference in points possible...we've both played about 30 games of the respective games but i only get a few and they hit the jackpot

13. Marraskuu 2004, 11:28:39
Stevie 
BBW=Mr popularity

you noticed its only since his real photo has been up LOL

13. Marraskuu 2004, 11:28:13
Stevie 
BBW Fencer wants you LOL

13. Marraskuu 2004, 06:30:27
Fencer 
Thank you, Number 2560 :-)

13. Marraskuu 2004, 00:35:22
Stevie 
LMAO

13. Marraskuu 2004, 00:33:47
bwildman 
yeah...thx BBW :-)your the greatest!!

13. Marraskuu 2004, 00:29:29
coan.net 
In the player list, you can sort by first signin date, which orders it by ID number.

... is this what you are asking?

13. Marraskuu 2004, 00:27:42
bwildman 
Otsikko: member id
is there a way to list members by their ID number?////
do ID numbers escalate as members join?ie:Fencer is number 1
Bwildman is number 5244..

12. Marraskuu 2004, 23:06:17
Stevie 
see LOL

12. Marraskuu 2004, 21:17:44
Eriisa 
Otsikko: Re: have you noticed that if you
oh? lol

12. Marraskuu 2004, 18:33:53
Stevie 
Otsikko: have you noticed that if you "reply" to a
message with " in the title, the reply title is cut short?
Its only happened since bk2

12. Marraskuu 2004, 01:23:48
coan.net 
Otsikko: Re: Adding notes
.... and an option to have it viewable above the game board, otherwise it is mostly useless.

12. Marraskuu 2004, 00:55:57
Dragon 
Otsikko: Adding notes
Could it made so that only the last note is left visible and not previous ones?

<< <   497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506   > >>
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
Takaisin alkuun