Käyttäjätunnus: Salasana:
Uuden käyttäjän rekisteröinti
Valvoja(t): Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Viestejä per sivu:
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Ratsu.
Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
Etsi viesteistä:  

<< <   357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366   > >>
3. Helmikuu 2006, 19:47:58
pauloaguia 
Otsikko: Re:
alanback: Just sort the player list by membership level. Black rooks show up among the others... there are 4 total

3. Helmikuu 2006, 19:47:06
furbster 
I just happened to be browsing tourneys but if you go on online players 2 are online

3. Helmikuu 2006, 19:45:56
alanback 
Otsikko: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Where can you see these?

3. Helmikuu 2006, 19:43:05
coan.net 
Otsikko: Re:
furbster: I see 4 total, but don't know why.

3. Helmikuu 2006, 19:41:00
Stevie 
Otsikko: Re:
furbster: I guess Filip just hasnt added it to the paid memnbership page yet hehe

3. Helmikuu 2006, 19:40:12
furbster 
yeh

3. Helmikuu 2006, 19:39:25
Stevie 
Otsikko: Re:
furbster: The rook is also diferent.. its black or dark grey

3. Helmikuu 2006, 19:37:53
furbster 
ok i've seen two of em now.. it can't be just me lol

3. Helmikuu 2006, 19:33:25
furbster 
How can you be brainrook forever? I'm sure if my eyes aren't deceiving me that i just saw someone with that dexcription lol Unless he's payed for a load of years in advance?

3. Helmikuu 2006, 17:56:36
Stevie 
Otsikko: Re: Fencer,,, why cant my oponent or I move in these games?
Fencer: Cheers Filip

3. Helmikuu 2006, 16:45:35
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re: Fencer,,, why cant my oponent or I move in these games?
Stevie: Wait a minute.

3. Helmikuu 2006, 16:11:31
Stevie 
Otsikko: Fencer,,, why cant my oponent or I move in these games?

3. Helmikuu 2006, 14:47:22
furbster 
Otsikko: Random tournements
I think this is a really cool thing to have, thanks Fencer... something different and fun to have a go at

2. Helmikuu 2006, 22:39:55
Vikings 
Otsikko: Re: "Improved" tournament system
playBunny: probably have to be a knight and experiment

2. Helmikuu 2006, 14:00:26
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: [Runs off to Membership Levels] "Hmm, nothing changed there, but then that'll be the last part of any changes. Where else can I look..?"

I wonder what it was you did..

2. Helmikuu 2006, 13:55:27
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re: "Improved" tournament system
playBunny: Hmmmm, maybe I did.

2. Helmikuu 2006, 13:28:35
bouncer 
Otsikko: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: I didn't ask you to change anything .I just express my "bad" feeling about this thing. I thought that's why we have "discussion" bords .

2. Helmikuu 2006, 13:26:59
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: "everybody is free to use only features he likes."

Mostly true. Knights who only play a few games can't utilise the tournament system as they might like because of the one-per-game-type restiction. Eg, a Knight in a multi-year Backgammon tournament can enjoy no other.

Unless you've changed that somewhere along the line?

2. Helmikuu 2006, 13:21:51
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re: "Improved" tournament system
ZEROZERO: If you think it stinks, don't use it. That's what BrainKing is about, everybody is free to use only features he likes. I think it's pointless to discuss in this way because nobody likes everything. Whatever your point is, I don't play to change anything.

2. Helmikuu 2006, 12:58:18
bouncer 
Otsikko: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: that's right ...and nobody "forced" me to pay lol ..I was only paying for those members because I wanted them to enjoy this great site and they didn't have enough money to buy a membership or they didn't have a credit card and so on .... at his moment I'm afraid when I see things like this happen .I think the whole "brain" system stinks .. When a player pays a membership for another person I think you should give the brains automatically ...OK...I didn't read the whole stuff about the brain system , cause, as I said, I'm not interested in all that administration rubbish ....but now , more than one year later I cannot sign up for those tourneys ...I think that sucks a bit :)
We'll see what other improvements are coming up but I don't have a good feeling with this first one :(((

2. Helmikuu 2006, 12:40:28
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re: "Improved" tournament system
ZEROZERO: The prize tournaments with an entry fee is just one small part of the improved tournament system. And, of course, nobody is forced to pay for other users.

2. Helmikuu 2006, 12:06:39
bouncer 
Otsikko: "Improved" tournament system
I have my doubts about this tournament system .
I bought lots of memberships for different players with my credit card but since I'm not interested in administration things, I didn't know about the brain system. This means I didn't mention whatever I needed to mention to obtain those brains . Right : at this moment I got 0 brains so I cannot sign up for this "improved" tournament system .
Besides this , I'm afraid this kind of tournaments will create a small group of elite players ..those who got "brains" :))Playing for more brains ....
Oh well ....not my problem ...I will go on playing "normal" games, but I think I'll stop paying new memberships for belgian players who got no credit-card or players who are afraid for internet payments. No more renewals of memberships with my credit card .

2. Helmikuu 2006, 09:18:42
Peón Libre 
Otsikko: editing posts
Having just posted a redundant reply on another board, I'm curious about the possibility of editing or removing one's own posts. I sometimes see posts flagged as modified, but I haven't found any way to do this. Is this another feature which is only available to paying members?

2. Helmikuu 2006, 07:26:20
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: No, this kind of bonus always applies to the user for whom the membership was bought. It is done on a system level.

2. Helmikuu 2006, 02:40:32
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: not to butt in here Chuckers.. but, I have recently purchased 3 membieships and have gotten the credit and the brains for each one.. just add a note to the purchase to credit your account with the brains and bonus..

2. Helmikuu 2006, 01:52:14
Pedro Martínez 
Otsikko: Re:
Pythagoras: BBC :)

2. Helmikuu 2006, 01:41:02
Czuch 
Fencer....

If I buy a membership for someone else, can I have the bonus membership in my name instead of theirs, should it be given? Or even saved for use in a prize tournament?

2. Helmikuu 2006, 00:18:38
alanback 
Otsikko: Re: Buying a 6-months Rook membership
playBunny: Anatomically, it might be more correct to think of extending Rookhood into Pawnness anyway . . .

2. Helmikuu 2006, 00:13:08
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re: Buying a 6-months Rook membership
alanback: Lol. I don't believe you can extend your own Pawness into someone else's Rookhood! But as to who the extension is being applied to ... whomever you nominate.

2. Helmikuu 2006, 00:07:24
alanback 
Otsikko: Re: Buying a 6-months Rook membership
playBunny: How do you know if you're extending your Pawnness into your own Rookhood or someone else's?

2. Helmikuu 2006, 00:04:02
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re: Buying a 6-months Rook membership
Pythagoras: I believe the answer to 1) is that you don't actually buy memberships, per se, you buy membership extensions. It's just that with some people they are extending their Pawnness into Rookhood. So it would be B).

I asked a similar question to 2) and 3) way back whenever and got the answer "Fencer would work something out", so I'll be interested to hear any further elucidation.

2. Helmikuu 2006, 00:02:57
Chicago Bulls 
Otsikko: Re: Bonus
Muokannut Chicago Bulls (2. Helmikuu 2006, 00:03:12)
alanback: I was thinking the same......
This system is like:

  • You completed a purchase of 6 months membership and won another 3 months!

    Or......:

  • You completed a purchase of 6 months membership
    and DIDN'T WIN any bonus you sucker.....

  • 1. Helmikuu 2006, 23:54:00
    alanback 
    Otsikko: Bonus
    I'm risk averse. Instead of a 50% chance at a 50% bonus, can I have a 25% bonus guaranteed?

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 23:46:03
    Chicago Bulls 
    I have 3 questions. If you are too lazy to answer all 3 then the first is of the most importance for me!


    1)What would happen if someone with Rook membership, buy a 6-months Rook membership at 14 February while it still has 5 more months of Rook membership:

    A)He would have, starting from 14 February, 6-months of Rook membership....

    B)He would have, starting from 14 February, 11-months of Rook membership.....

    A) or B) is valid?

    ---------------------------------------
    --------
    2)What would happen if someone with Rook membership, buy a 6-months Knight membership at 14 February while it still has 5 more months of Rook membership:

    A)He would have, starting from 14 February, 6-months of Knight membership....

    B)He would have, starting from 14 February, 5-months of rook membership and then 6 motnhs of Knight membership....

    C)Something else.....

    Is A) or B) or C) valid?

    ---------------------------------------
    ------
    3)What would happen if someone with Rook membership, buy a 6-months Maharajah membership at 14 February while it still has 5 more months of Rook membership:

    A)He would have, starting from 14 February, 6-months of Maharajah membership....

    B)He would have, starting from 14 February, 5-months of Rook membership and then 6 months of Maharajah membeship....

    C)Something else.....

    A) or B) or C) is valid?
    ----------------------------------------------

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 22:55:30
    Fencer 
    Otsikko: Re:
    Fwiffo: Right.

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 22:54:41
    Fwiffo 
    The "link" link in the upper right corner of each message is perfect! It is new, right?

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 20:53:20
    playBunny 
    Otsikko: Re: Cash tournaments
    alanback: Lol. I haven't got a lawyer's hat to be not sure with but that's okay - I'm already not sure that's true. I'm just remembering bits of conversation from the Feature's Board.

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 20:45:38
    alanback 
    Otsikko: Re: Cash tournaments
    playBunny: Putting on my lawyer hat, I'm not sure that's true, if Brains can be purchased for cash.

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 20:39:29
    playBunny 
    Otsikko: Re: Cash tournaments
    Muokannut playBunny (1. Helmikuu 2006, 20:39:54)
    Czuch: One key aspect of Brains is that it isn't cash and therefore the tourneys cannot fall foul of gambling prohibitions. (Do a search for gambling on the Features Requests board where there was a conversation about it.)

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 20:35:37
    Czuch 
    Otsikko: Re:
    Marfitalu: Ahhh... thanks, I didnt see that!
    Can we do a cash tournament as well?

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 20:05:29
    Eriisa 
    Otsikko: Re:
    Czuch Chuckers: gotta admit.... You left yourself open for that one! lol !!!

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 19:43:16
    Stevie 
    Otsikko: Re: What if I have no brains?
    Czuch Chuckers: You follow the yellow brick road cos the Wizard could help you out

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 19:41:59
    Czuch 
    Are brains the only currency to use in these new tournaments? What if I have no brains?

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 19:04:35
    Fencer 

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 17:23:13
    Andre Faria 
    I love the new features... Well done Filip... :)

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 14:40:35
    Fencer 
    Otsikko: Re: Prize tournaments with an entry fee
    Beren the 32nd: It will be up to the tournament creator.

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 14:36:56
    Beren the 32nd 
    Otsikko: Prize tournaments with an entry fee
    How would 3rd prize be decided?
    I'm thinking especially of the case where there are two sections, with their winners playing in a final.

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 12:50:35
    Fencer 
    Otsikko: Re: Fencer....
    Pythagoras: 1) My usual typo. 2) Yes.

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 12:20:45
    Chicago Bulls 
    Otsikko: Re: Fencer....
    Fencer: .
    .
    .
    But Fencer you didn't answer my questions and as a most curious person i'm looking forward.....

    To save you of the reading of my somewhat difficult to read posts here are the points:

    1)Should in the:......
    "a two year membership payment makes a good change to get the whole year for free"?
    .......the word "change" should have replaced with "chance"?


    2)There is not any 2 year membership available for buying! Only a ½ year or 1 year!
    Do you mean buying 2 one year memberships at the same time......?

    1. Helmikuu 2006, 12:13:10
    Chicago Bulls 
    Otsikko: Re:
    pauloaguia: Yep and this is true.....While it is also true that exactly 6 months is 50%.

    << <   357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366   > >>
    Päivämäärä ja aika
    Ystävät palvelimella
    Suosikki keskustelut
    Yhteisöt
    Päivän vinkki
    Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
    Takaisin alkuun