Any such method used in this game is a strategy, not a formula.
As anything in game theory, it is statistical in nature, not deterministic.
In plain language, the claim is not that a player who uses a fixed strategy could win any pond he enters, such a claim is obviously nonsense, and Ed never made such a claim. The claim is that entering a sufficient number of ponds he'd win more than he would if he plays only by guesses, regular instict, tea leaves or whatever.
And I agree with Andre, why bother? it's only a game. But VERY addictive!
(ocultar) Puedes utilizar etiquetas HTML en tus mensajes o, si eres miembro de pago, puedes también hacer uso del Editor de Texto Enriquecido (RTE). (pauloaguia) (mostrar todos los consejos)