Nombre de Usuario: Contraseña:
Registro de un Nuevo Usuario
Moderador: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mensajes por página:
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Peón.
Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
Buscar entre los mensajes:  

<< <   359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368   > >>
18. Enero 2006, 22:31:47
plaintiger 
Asunto: Re:
Modificado por plaintiger (18. Enero 2006, 22:33:57)
harley: oh. i see. i'm one of those people who's never managed to fully internalize the "it's just a game" sentiment...i agree with those who think the behavior we're discussing is rude, and while i wouldn't say it *hurts* me, i do find it very annoying. and i think it's interesting (in an annoyed kind of way) to try to figure out why someone would do that. but i can see Your point of view too...not everybody cares about such things.

and maybe that's our reason why right there.

18. Enero 2006, 22:09:15
harley 
Asunto: Re:
plaintiger: Avoiding conflict? Not at all, man. I just live and let live. It doesn't hurt me if someone resigns, its just a game.

18. Enero 2006, 21:47:24
plaintiger 
Asunto: Re:
Eriisa: oh-ho! good point! i did forget about that little aspect of it.

it's still downright rude to one's opponent though, at least when no attempt is made to explain the resignation.

still, the ratings hit is a consolation. thank You for reminding me about that.

18. Enero 2006, 21:29:23
Eriisa 
Asunto: Re:
plaintiger: If they resign halfway through a game, doesn't that ruin their BKR? They are only hurting themself in that case....

At least, that's how I see it.

18. Enero 2006, 21:27:10
plaintiger 
harley: of people putting a lot of games in the waiting room and then resigning halfway through them, You say, Why try to make sense of it?! It takes all kinds, I'm sure they had their reasons even if we can't understand them.

You're advocating complacency. You're saying, "the hell with etiquette, polite behavior, principles...people should be allowed to do anything they please, and no-one should ever complain about it, because the perpetrators must have their reasons."

that's a blanket excuse for any behavior at all. Hitler, Qadaffi, Jeffrey Dahmer...they all had their reasons. i'm not equating the behavior of game-bailers with the behavior of those three, but the principle is the same. if certain codes of behavior are simply ignored, a civilization, be it that of a country or of a gaming site, falls apart.

it's possible to go too far in one's efforts to avoid conflict, Lady, and i think that's what You're doing here.

18. Enero 2006, 00:24:25
WhisperzQ 
Asunto: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
wetware: And to complete the set there are:

6x6: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=106
10x10: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=96
Other Variants: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=45
Chinese: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=92
Japanese: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=94

There are also some German speaking boards and maybe other languages too.

Cheers ... WQ:)

17. Enero 2006, 20:45:17
wetware 
Asunto: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
harley: Great recommendation. That 8x8 discussion board will suit me perfectly! Thank you.

16. Enero 2006, 18:09:25
harley 
Asunto: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
wetware: If you like three checks chess yu might find this chess variants 8x8 discussion board interesting;

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=6

Or maybe the chess variants 10x8;

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=34

16. Enero 2006, 17:25:25
wetware 
Asunto: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
Matarilevich: Thanks so much for the prompt reply! ww

16. Enero 2006, 17:22:09
Kili 
Asunto: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
wetware: The board fot this question is chess variants.
A double check counts as one check in the global sum of checks in a game of three checks chess

16. Enero 2006, 17:16:31
wetware 
Asunto: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
Feel free to move this question to another area, if there's a more appropriate place. Does a double check count as one check or two, according to the BrainKing software? My guess (and preference) is "one", but I need to know in order to choose the proper continuation in a current game. Thanks in advance!

14. Enero 2006, 16:40:04
ScarletRose 
doing good here as well

14. Enero 2006, 16:22:46
baddessi 
everything seems fine on this side of the pond

14. Enero 2006, 14:23:50
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Im having big probs
Stevie: Likewise. For me the problem is highly intermittent and most accesses are behaving. Then a big hesitation or several little one occur. UK problem, I guesss. [shrug]

14. Enero 2006, 14:08:21
Stevie 
Asunto: Re: Im having big probs
playBunny: what are you on? Im on 2.2Meg broadband dsl

14. Enero 2006, 14:06:13
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Im having big probs
Stevie: Reeeeeeaalllly slow response times here as well.

14. Enero 2006, 14:04:23
Stevie 
Asunto: Im having big probs
with page loading speeds etc etc especially when using messages..

Is it just me?

13. Enero 2006, 02:06:54
Bwild 
good people like baddessi make BrainKing a pleasure to visit.
Congrats young lady.

13. Enero 2006, 01:01:57
baddessi 
Asunto: Re:
alanback: thanks
now back on topic everyone!

13. Enero 2006, 01:00:22
alanback 
Asunto: Re:
baddessi: At the risk of being ruled off topic, let me say you are a welcome feature :-)

13. Enero 2006, 00:58:30
baddessi 
Asunto: Re:
harley: I always thought of myself more as a feature : )
Thanks Eriisa(the flake) and harley

13. Enero 2006, 00:55:09
skipinnz 
Asunto: Re:
alanback: S no W

12. Enero 2006, 23:54:29
alanback 
Asunto: Re:
Eriisa: So, are you trying to tell us your a flake?

12. Enero 2006, 23:53:15
Eriisa 
Asunto: Re:
alanback: lol

12. Enero 2006, 23:51:20
harley 
Asunto: Re:
Eriisa: I think he was joking, theres a winking face there!
I always knew baddy was a structure

12. Enero 2006, 23:51:02
alanback 
Asunto: Re:
Eriisa: Who pays attention to moderators anyway??? ;-)

12. Enero 2006, 23:50:00
Eriisa 
LOL, I guess I just assumed everyone would see her name up there.

12. Enero 2006, 23:49:48
alanback 
Asunto: Re:
Eriisa: Absolutely. This is a board to discuss BrainKing, not to discuss this board

12. Enero 2006, 23:43:31
furbster 
Asunto: Re:
Modificado por furbster (12. Enero 2006, 23:43:41)
Eriisa: Woulda perhaps been useful if you mentioned it with your message.

12. Enero 2006, 23:41:57
Eriisa 
Asunto: Re:
alanback: Congrats to the new moderator of the board is off topic????

since when? A moderator is a part of the structure and feature..........

12. Enero 2006, 23:35:40
alanback 
Asunto: Re:
Eriisa:

12. Enero 2006, 23:32:13
Eriisa 
congrats Baddy!!!!


12. Enero 2006, 20:31:47
Adaptable Ali 
Asunto: Re: Zero points awarded in Sphere Froglet
prettymama:

12. Enero 2006, 19:20:29
prettymama 
Asunto: Re: Zero points awarded in Sphere Froglet
playBunny: Thank You

12. Enero 2006, 19:18:20
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Zero points awarded in Sphere Froglet
prettymama: Lol. It does seem strange but it makes sense. It's due to the fact that Sphere froglet is so new.

Blackviper's ranked #2 in Sphere Froglet but that's because he's the second of only 2 players who have an established rating! Everyone else, including yourself, is provisionally rated and ranked. On that ranking you're at #41 whereas blackviper is #72. And his rating is 895 to your 1368. That difference of 473 explains, as Steve said, why you get no points for a win.

12. Enero 2006, 19:11:43
prettymama 
Asunto: Re: points
ScarletRose: thanks to you n stevie but I think his answer may be right we r playing single games n if I lose the game I lose 100 points go figure n i'm playing someone with a 4 ranking lol

12. Enero 2006, 19:06:03
ScarletRose 
Asunto: Re: points
prettymama: That is due to it being a set match.. meaning there are multiple games under one match.. perhaps when the invite was set up it said 7 matches.. ?? don't know the exact number it was set for.. but, non the less when the last game is complete you will get points.. or your opponent will.. whichever one satisfy's the contract of the game..

12. Enero 2006, 18:52:22
Stevie 
Asunto: Re: points
prettymama: It may be because your opponent has a low BKR

12. Enero 2006, 18:48:55
prettymama 
Asunto: points
Hi my question is about winning points I've been playing spere froglet new game for me but sense i got my bk ratings I have not won any points again this game is show 0 points if I win why is this

11. Enero 2006, 05:10:31
Stevie 
Asunto: Re: If you put someone on block..
frolind: ok thanks :o)

11. Enero 2006, 05:09:23
frolind 
Asunto: Re: If you put someone on block..
Stevie: No, they can't.

11. Enero 2006, 05:04:38
Stevie 
Asunto: If you put someone on block..
I know they can not invite you to a game...
But can they pick one of your games up from in the waiting room?

11. Enero 2006, 02:43:19
NOT a floosie 
Asunto: Re:
Fwiffo: I agree, please stay on topic.

Chatty posts will be deleted.

11. Enero 2006, 02:37:49
Fwiffo 
I'm sorry to bring this up - but why are people so often using the brainking.com board as a chatroom? Sometimes I have to scroll through dozens of these kind of messages in just one day... totally irrelevant to "brainking itself, its structure, features and future."
It is very time-consuming and it frustrates me a lot, up to the point I decided to remove Brainking.com from my "favourite boards".

I don't know, maybe I'm the only one feeling this way... but I hope people can restrain themselves a bit more.

11. Enero 2006, 00:05:07
Skyking 
Asunto: Re: Draughts
saii: Did you advertise in the waiting room

11. Enero 2006, 00:01:05
Bwild 
Asunto: Re: Draughts
saii: you may try the checkers discussion board. good luck.

10. Enero 2006, 23:48:26
saii 
Asunto: Draughts
To sophisticated contestants,

Please send me a message to my inbox, invite me to a match (public/private) or email me: yahooexcite@hoshmail.com to arrange faster games.

P.S. No cheating!

Happy New Year,

10. Enero 2006, 13:39:57
Chicago Bulls 
Asunto: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
Modificado por Chicago Bulls (10. Enero 2006, 14:00:55)
WhisperzQ: "i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all)......"

When someone says as a welcome message instead of "Hi" or "good luck to you too", the "gvdl* you too".
I just noticed that and i asked what is his problem and as he has some hours to play i will soon find out the answer to this question!
While you, you'll never find the answer to your question of draws....

*= -1

10. Enero 2006, 13:31:56
WhisperzQ 
Asunto: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
WhisperzQ: No, there are some who offer from about move 3 or 4 (although it may true that there is game is indeed lost even at this stage, they just don't know it yet ... LOL j/k :)

10. Enero 2006, 13:28:24
Andre Faria 
Asunto: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
WhisperzQ: eheh, only when their game is already lost... :)

<< <   359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368   > >>
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados.
Volver a arriba