Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Chaos 
 Espionage

For all Espionage fans


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

16. Settembre 2010, 23:41:26
cookie monster 
I don't know that there is much of an advantage to be gained by revealing pieces early without decreasing the number of Recons in play. To the extent that there is an advantage, I'd be more interested in knowing where my opponents 1s are as they pose the most danger to my Recons.

16. Settembre 2010, 23:46:13
Nothingness 
Argomento: Re:
cookie monster: A 1 and a 2 would be the last pieces i would want to know the location of early. unless it was all of them. the sabs or the 3s and 4s are most important to me for the end game.

17. Settembre 2010, 00:31:21
SL-Mark 
Argomento: Re:
cookie monster: I think we have to assume that all recons are present, and negotiations take place before the board is set up.

What would you share with me for the knowledge of my five 1s? Perhaps your five recons? Or maybe four 1s for four recons?

17. Settembre 2010, 01:27:45
cookie monster 
Argomento: Re:
SL-Mark:

Mark- I think once you show me five 1s I can show half of my pieces and still reach a complete information situation with my recons . . .they simply have to avoid your 1s.

17. Settembre 2010, 23:50:41
Chaos 
Argomento: Re:
cookie monster: Even if you know all my 1s it would be hard to get around them! I think I could stop/get rid of your recons using my 1s, some 2s and some of my recons. I'd go for the deal!

18. Settembre 2010, 00:08:11
SL-Mark 
Argomento: Re:
Chaos: I think Cookie Monster is offering you 2.5 recons for five 1s.

2 recons for five 1s well I would go for the side of disclosing recons.
3 recons for five 1s, here I would show you my five 1s!

18. Settembre 2010, 00:14:29
Chaos 
Argomento: Re:
SL-Mark: Oh, I thought he wanted to show half of all his pieces if in return for the 1s. I thought it was a brave thing to do indeed.

18. Settembre 2010, 00:21:32
SL-Mark 
Argomento: Re:
Chaos: He was replying to my previous post, hence I am assuming he meant half his recons!
If it was half his pieces, I still don't think it would make much difference against Eric!

18. Settembre 2010, 00:27:46
Chaos 
Argomento: Re:
SL-Mark: hmmm, still I think even Eric's recons can't fly through 1s so I'd happily take a shot if he shows me half his army.

18. Settembre 2010, 00:24:21
SL-Mark 
Argomento: Re:
Chaos: And have you thought about my earlier offer of both 5s for all your 1s? I will even throw in a mine or two if you wish :)

18. Settembre 2010, 00:32:53
Chaos 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da Chaos (18. Settembre 2010, 13:27:47)

SL-Mark: I don't care about the mines anymore. In my early days I've walked into one of Sandoz' (when he was still hageroff) mines with a 5 after deducting this piece couldn't be backed up by a sab or 5. Eversince I know how to deal with unmovable pieces.As for your offer, I'm more interested in your 4s. How about your 4s and your base?


18. Settembre 2010, 00:56:41
SL-Mark 
Argomento: Re:
Chaos: My precious 4s and base!
I would accept this offer.
Anything else you would care to exchange in this game? I would be interested in learning the location of some of your recons. I put my 2s on the table.

18. Settembre 2010, 13:43:15
Chaos 
Argomento: Re:
SL-Mark: In addition I'll show 2 of my recons for your four 2s.

18. Settembre 2010, 15:15:54
SL-Mark 
Argomento: Re:
Chaos: Mmmmm, finding it difficult to evaluate this information exchange, moreso in the light of the previous exchange.

Against my better judgement I will agree :)
So we have:
I show 2s, 4s and base
You show 1s and two recons.

Suddenly my 3s and 5s looked very exposed :(

18. Settembre 2010, 16:02:12
Chaos 
Argomento: Re:

SL-Mark: it was your own proposal


Anyway, we each know 7 pieces, right? :)


I only have 1 problem: I don't think I can play two such games at the same time because of the tracking. If it's okay with you I'll play Eric first. Shouldn't take that long given the way and frequency of our play.


18. Settembre 2010, 18:27:14
SL-Mark 
Argomento: Re:
Chaos: I said I would put my 2s on the table. I didn't necessarily mean all of them... three 2s for two recons would have been more friendly

18. Settembre 2010, 18:48:53
Chaos 
Argomento: Re:
SL-Mark: who ever told you I'm friendly?

18. Settembre 2010, 18:49:56
SL-Mark 
Argomento: Re:
Chaos:

Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio