 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}. Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
<< < 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 > >> 26. Luglio 2007, 20:02:22 Argomento: Key mode Does anybody else have the same problem? Every time I'm logging into the site it switches to key mode, and I have to change the xx to se or en, or whatever language code. It's also independent of which browser I'm using. I've cleared the cash and all too. Does anyone have a clue to what's wrong !? 26. Luglio 2007, 01:26:51 Argomento: Re: Ratings graph  coan.net: that makes sense, thanks 26. Luglio 2007, 01:07:19 Argomento: Re: Ratings graph  nodnarbo: It might have to do with 3 of the games have under 4 moves - so may not "count" towards the rating - even though you have a rating. So probable just one of the "loop holes" in the coding. Probable will take a few more games before the graph shows up. 26. Luglio 2007, 01:00:17 Argomento: Re: Ratings graph pauloaguia: ah, but I have a ranking 26. Luglio 2007, 00:49:57 Argomento: Re: Ratings graph  nodnarbo: yes, you can't see a graph before you have a ranking. It's the same reason why your ranking is hidden until after you have at least 5 games. If you could see the chart, then you'd know what it is... 26. Luglio 2007, 00:35:36 Argomento: Ratings graph I have a button to click to see my rating graph for Behemoth Chess but there is no graph. Does this have anything to do with the fact that I only have 4 completed games? I thought I'd post here because I wasn't sure if it was a bug or not 25. Luglio 2007, 09:43:42 Argomento: Re: gogul: please post the general notes on general chat :) 24. Luglio 2007, 23:14:36 Argomento: Re:  Bernice: Yes I know, It's mad, because I thought Asasel, not Behemot  24. Luglio 2007, 23:08:15  ??HUH?? 24. Luglio 2007, 21:37:02 And I like it :) my full name gets present  24. Luglio 2007, 21:05:06 This is a general note: Always be careful to open links you don't know. Lawyers, estate agents and all sort of these peeps have programs at disposition to spy each of us. 24. Luglio 2007, 14:38:49 Argomento: Re:  Rose: Mine are still green unless its not my turn. 24. Luglio 2007, 13:51:22 Anyone had this happen to them? When you go to your dice poker game the green background area indicating what you need to roll is no longer green but is now a white background like the rest of the board. Don't know if there is something that has to be checked to make this feature work or if its a glitch. Any help would be appreciated. 23. Luglio 2007, 18:49:36 Argomento: Re: Gordon Shumway: fair point, can ya pm then lol 23. Luglio 2007, 18:48:20 Argomento: Re:  Oceans Apart: If your opponent would be cheating in that way, you'll certainly notice it  I am sure Fencer could go ahead an reverse games in which people would have used it - but that would be a lot of work to do, so it might be better to not frankly tell it on BK board. 23. Luglio 2007, 18:42:08 Argomento: Re: coan.net: hey thats ok, just wasnt sure, if i was genuinly terrible at the game, or my opponent is/was cheating lol 23. Luglio 2007, 18:40:42 Argomento: Re: Oceans Apart: Lets wait until Fencer has a chance to fix it. Most people are OK with it, and will only test it with unrated games and such - but there are a few on this site who will do anything to gain rating points - which some would call cheating, but they would probable say something like "Well the system allowed me to do it so it must be OK" or something like that. So sometimes it takes Fencer a little bit to find the problem and fix it. 23. Luglio 2007, 18:29:27 Can this be shared at all 23. Luglio 2007, 16:23:08 Argomento: Re: Gordon Shumway: indeed very odd. I've never seen anything like this before. 23. Luglio 2007, 16:01:25 Argomento: Re: HoityToity: No, she is not. She discovered some really severe misbehavior, I just tried it out myself (in an uncounted game). 23. Luglio 2007, 09:03:41 Argomento: Re: Kunoichi_Power: Well I hope you are not referring to our game of Mancala, which you recon you outplayed me but I won. You should read the rules before you shout 'bug' or 'cheat'. I would explain to you in PM but you did not give me time to respond to your accusations before placing me on Block. 23. Luglio 2007, 01:23:09 Argomento: Re: Kunoichi_Power: well, when it gets fixed tell us what it was, that sounds interesting 22. Luglio 2007, 23:51:43 Argomento: Re: It's something that someone can exploit to instantly win a certain game, so I don't think I'll be posting it publically in the bug reports thing. 22. Luglio 2007, 22:10:00 Argomento: Re: Found game bug. Modificato da MadMonkey (22. Luglio 2007, 22:17:54)  Kunoichi_Power: Are you certain it is a bug and not a different rule brainking uses compared to one you may know elsewhere. It would be a shock if there was any serious bug in any game here at present(maybe a small one not fixed yet), they have all been tested thoroughly. What type of game is it in ? 22. Luglio 2007, 22:02:59 Argomento: Re: Found game bug. Modificato da baddessi (22. Luglio 2007, 22:06:38) Kunoichi_Power: There is a bug tracker: http://brainking.com/en/BugTracker if it's something real bad, you might send a PM to Fencer 22. Luglio 2007, 22:02:55  bug tracker http://brainking.com/en/BugTracker 22. Luglio 2007, 21:46:07 Argomento: Found game bug. I found a game error. It's pretty bad, not even sure I should share in public. Who do I report it to? 22. Luglio 2007, 03:25:03 Argomento: Re: Smiley settings. AbigailII: That's about to come 22. Luglio 2007, 01:46:21 Argomento: Re: if people acted the same way outside of the web as they do here, half of them would be locked up.  AbigailII:  I keep escaping though.    22. Luglio 2007, 00:07:18 Argomento: Re: Smiley settings. alanback: Considering the ration of smileys vs words some people use, yes, I do ignore people in real live who would act the same as they do here with smileys. In fact, if people acted the same way outside of the web as they do here, half of them would be locked up. 21. Luglio 2007, 19:50:10 Argomento: Re: Smiley settings. AbigailII: I'm interested to know whether you adopt the same approach to your interactions with people off the web -- do you ignore body language, facial expression, tone of voice, etc.? I believe smileys are intended to substitute for those nonverbal cues that convey so much of our meaning (as much as 90%, according to some authorities). I'm sure most people would agree that a great deal of information can be conveyed by a wink!  21. Luglio 2007, 18:26:40 Argomento: Re: Smiley settings. AbigailII: But I  smileys, especially when people are creative with them  Guess it's a matter of personal choice 21. Luglio 2007, 18:23:15 Argomento: Re: Smiley settings. pauloaguia: Yes, and? It's my choice, isn't it? If people are currently answering post with a silly blinking smiley (or worse, answering with a dozen of them), do you really think I'm going to spend a millisecond in trying to figure out what they mean? If one can't be bothered to use words in a post, I can't be bothered to read them. 21. Luglio 2007, 13:50:16 Argomento: Re: Smiley settings. AbigailII: About your last option: sometimes Fencer (and others) answers requests with just a smile, you may miss important information if you hide those posts... 21. Luglio 2007, 13:25:10 Argomento: Smiley settings. I've a suggestion for smiley settings. Currently, the options are either smileys or numbers. My proposal is a three state switch: smileys, numbers, and no smileys. The latter would neither show smileys, nor numbers. Oh, and a setting "ignore posts with more smileys than words" would be great as well. 20. Luglio 2007, 19:35:04 Argomento: Re: Another Question???? pauloaguia: I always check my games before I send it as I posted in my message. I am on webtv so at first I thought it was maybe something with that... but since it happened about 5 times I got to wondering why? I don't have the games, becauseI played them. When I get another one I will report it there. Thanks. You too Maxxina. 20. Luglio 2007, 17:47:47 Argomento: Re: Another Question???? Pbarb2: Post a bug in the bug tracker with links to specific games and move numbers. Then Fencer may take a closer look. Do you usually click on it before the page is completely loaded? And do you usually check the page before submiting the move to make sure that it was played where you intended it to? Sometimes, elements in the page may shift position while the page is being loaded, and you can click on one place that suddenly becomes some place else, and you end up making a move you didn't intend to. That's why you should always check the move before actually submiting. Not sure if this is your case, but it's a frequent situation forsome users... 20. Luglio 2007, 17:45:02 Pbarb : Put here some id of games where it is . It will help fencer a lot 20. Luglio 2007, 16:41:20 Argomento: Another Question???? I have been playing the dice games. I am getting 0's where I don't place them. They are coming right in the beginning of my games. No reason not to fill a space. I look at each game before I send it. Is anyone having this problem? This has just happened in the last few weeks. I know that I place 0's when no other move can be made...but this is not that type of move. I just had this happen on my 5th game. Thanks.. if anyone can help me in this. 20. Luglio 2007, 12:46:32 Argomento: Team tournaments  ive just noticed on the gameaddicts ludo team the captain has entered a player who is now a pawn will this player still be allowed to play or should i get him to withdraw the team and put someone else in? 20. Luglio 2007, 09:45:44 Argomento: Re: gogul: ok lets finish this .. discussions about game rules (or other important issues) should be on the appropriate board, when the poster thinks it doesnt get any attention within a certain amount of time he might post it on here, but the mods will redirect the discussion following from it to the appropriate board again of course it is (maybe this is a bit too ask from some people though ;)) intended that the posters think thoroughly if a message is important enough before posting it here ;) lets continue as it was before the messages about the turkish checkers rules, as that was clearly spam on all boards 20. Luglio 2007, 06:03:20 Argomento: Re: alanback: rofl....would like to be 19. Luglio 2007, 23:50:22 Argomento: Re: alanback: exacly 19. Luglio 2007, 23:48:18 19. Luglio 2007, 23:45:02 Argomento: Re: Eriisa: oups. I ment the interest groups 19. Luglio 2007, 23:37:31 Argomento: Re: Eriisa: Perhaps "passionately opinionated" 19. Luglio 2007, 23:34:08 passionated = passionate? 19. Luglio 2007, 23:28:32 Argomento: Re: new board ? Gabriel Almeida: Yes, and with the time the passionated players will own these boards ;) 19. Luglio 2007, 21:39:51 Argomento: Re: new board ? AbigailII: I agree with you. Games boards are empty, they doesn't work. Evn when we post there something, we never have replys from noone. It seems that they aren't seen for those game players. I do agree, there cold be less boards. These one could join all games boards. << < 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 > >> |
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Torna all'inizio |