Bernice: Yeah me too

Hey King Reza, we need somebody to interview now

Jim Dandy: LOL....Im sad 'cause I was so looking forward to reading the interview as well

heavenlyemma: Darn,the interview would now be doubly interesting
all kidding aside,I'm sorry to hear that

I'm very sorry but there will not be that interview from me

I quit the site..

Fencer, I was just reading your blog about Brainking showing up on gambling site lists when Googled.

You didnt mention this, but just maybe it also has to do with the fact that you have some games with the name "Poker" in them, IE "Dice Poker"?

I have had a problem with a saved Logik code for a while now, but have only just got round to trying to sort it, which i did.

Problem is Fencer is what caused it lol

I loaded a position i saved ages ago to use again.
Sure enough it loaded the five coloured pegs.
Now the problem, the Status above the code says not finished and there is no way to submit the game.
If i then remove a colour (so only 4 pegs in the code now) it will say Status Finished and there is a submit Goto choice.
When you do this it just throws you out of your games, back to main screen and the code in that game is still waiting to be set.
Any of my other saved codes work fine, so what was causing this one to go crazy ??

Anyway, as i said i sort of solved it(thats Logik for you lol), but no clue why this happened.
I went to game editor, loaded the saved position, which said not Finished (even though all 5 colours were there), and thought of things to try.
So i selected 'Random placement of remaining pieces'(even though there were none available as the code had 5 in it), BUT it worked, i now had Status Finished

So the question is, what caused this ?

can pawns not delete games? i dont see an option

MadMonkey: your post was 8pm my time friday night and it is now 11am saturday morning and the site is pathetically slow...Im cutting down games because of this, and definately will not sign up for any teams or tournaments any more....takes too long to load a page....I just cant be bothered with it...

"Snoopy": that probably explained the downtime a bit as well .. maybe fencer changed something so that cant happen anymore ?

trohat: games have now gone so it isnt a problem anymore

Hrqls: sorry we both had the same idea lol

Kunoichi_Power: I guess he had created these invitations before he went back to pawn, so he was allowed to do it ... that also explains why he wanted to have so many invitations ... he knew that he will have many started games and will not have to pay for new membership ... and when he changed to pawn they stayed there because brainking doesn*t have some rule to solve problem of this type ...

Kunoichi_Power: i think the check for more than 20 games is only done when the invitations are made .. he probably wasnt a pawn when he made them .. now they are made the limit of 20 games wont be checked anymore

AbigailII: It normally happens to me once or twice a day, but only on brainking.
This morning was crazy, seems better now though

MadMonkey: Yeah, it's quite common. Happens to me a few times each day when you cannot connect to the site for a short time. Usually 1 to 5 minutes.

No doubt Fencer will blame the international network. ;-)

Does anyone else keeping losing access to the site this morning ?
I have lost it 5 times in the last 2 hours (Unable to connect message) the same as when Fencer make a change etc... to the place.

Is it possible that the limitation for starting games only checks that no new games are made after exactly 20? Like maybe creating game invitations works by not allowing invitations when "games = 20", instead of "games >= 20", which would apply to those who were above pawn level but then go back to pawn.

I don't think it's possible to get above 20 without having already been above 20 before, I'm testing it now and it's not working.

srnity: one more question concerning the invites: robtoo has currently 1480 started games, started presumably before he went pawn. The system should let him finish the started games, but not start new ones, since 1480 is slightly larger than the allowed 20 for pawn . but in that case, shouldn't the invitations be eliminated?

I went and accepted one invite, and the game was created, and his count went up to 1481. (I then deleted the game, which may sound rude, but I'll forgive myself).

It looks like a bug.

oh glad its not just me, it is running very slow for me also

tippyc:

nodnarbo: to drag up an earlier topic again: thanks. i hadnt realized that you could block unrated games

srnity: I was prepared to spend money,but after checking out many reviews it seemed to measure up pretty well to the ones that cost money.

Jim Dandy: I've heard of AVAST - supposed to be good - I'm up for renewal on Symatec in a bit & looking around...I pay about $40 a year...The only thing it's ever caught from BK (and quarantined) was those two pop-up ads that wouldn't go away from while back Other than that, clean as a whistle

srnity: That's good to know.I just downloaded a new anti virus called AVAST this morning and I thought it might be the culprit

Mousetrap: Your not alone...I've tried Firefox and IE, logged out and back in, both the same...incredibly slow.....

Is Brainking still running at a snails pace or is it just me?
Each move takes years or I get booted off during the process. Using Firefox or Advant makes no difference except with Firefox you can read posts but can,t view videos properly and with Advant you can,t read posts but can view videos lmbo!

emmett: Yes - that is my thinking also. Of course I'll try to pick a couple popular, but also pick games that there has not been a team tournament for yet. I have my eyes on Nackgammon, and Dark Chess so far - which Dark Chess has not had a tournament yet. (but don't quote me on that - I may change my mind once I do create them) (AND AT LEAST 1 CHECKERS GAME)

coan.net: That sounds great

coan.net: Checkers (my favorite game) is treated like the crazy aunt in the basement in the BK tournament world. :(

nabla: Yea, there are all kinds of things that I need to keep in mind - like double cube - and time limits. Most time limits are 4 days (which is a good number in my opinion), but once we get into making regular tournaments monthly - I can see throwing in some faster 2 day tournament - or no days off - or other settings that can be changed. Goal would be to get a good variety to hopefully please many players.

coan.net: Thank you for your quick response. Some of us are really into the Team Tournaments, and we appreciate that this will be accomplished on a regular basis.

One suggestion that I have is that we include one game that has never been offered before in a Team Tournament before. This will introduce a seldom-played game to new players. I currently play many games that I had never tried before Team Tournaments introduced them to me.

emmett: The one posted earlier was just playing / testing - to make sure it did work - I guess before Fencer made this function, he was manually entering the tournaments into the database.... which was more work, and probable why he did not make that many often.

It's still 90 days before the "next" set, so I will probable wait awhile before I add more tournaments. I believe that me & Tanein will take turns - one creating a set each month. I will AT LEAST create them 30 days in advance, but probable closer to 60 days in advance - to give plenty of time to get teams together. I don't want to make them too soon - or a new game might get added to the site where I might want to create a tournament for.

(And if a time comes that we slow down on creating tournament, feel free to give me a friendly nudge to create more.)

coan.net: Your schedule sounds good and I agree that there should not be too many team tournaments. Just don't forget that all backgammon variants can be played without or with the doubling cube :-)

coan.net: I hope you keep us posted on team tournaments. There are some other things ( like interviews) that happen so rarely, with few updates, that one gives up wondering when the next one will happen. Some kind of regular feedback would be nice.

Also, you mentioned that you have to have six start each month. Why did only one get posted recently?

Eriisa: .... plus I would try to spread tournaments out - so I would probable pick 1 gammon game, probable Nack since that past tournament is already complete.

But that list is also misleading - since "short" game which do not last very long will of course have less active games - where Ludo (for example) takes awhile longer - so has a higher amount of current games.

oh my! There are 10,000 more Backgammon games than Chess!!!

emmett: I believe the ability to create site team tournaments were given to 2 people - myself & Tanein.

One thing I would hate to see is that the site team tournaments become so common like regular tournaments, that they lose their "special tournament" feel.

Currently, I think our plan for the site team tournaments is to have around 6 start each month. (that way hopefully enough to keep site team tournaments always going, but not enough to overload anyone).

Even though I have not set down to see which tournaments I would start next, the idea in my head is to have something like:

popular games = Current running games ( http://brainking.com/en/Statistics?p=2 ) is a good guide on how popular a game is... not a perfect indication, but again - just a good guide.

2 tournaments from the top 20 popular games

2-3 tournament from the 21-50 popular games

And at least 1, if not 2 tournament from the bottom 50 (well bottom 54) games

Again, that is just a rough outline on how I will try to spread out the games, so we can keep the popular tournaments going and include the not-as-popular games into the mix (which of course I'm happy to take suggestions.)

emmett: Logic would say Team Captains and Big Bosses should be able to as they can set Team challenges anyway and there is no real difference, but i see no option

Under the Team Tournaments link, it appears as though Tanein has created a new Team Tournament.

I would like to know who can create a Team tournament.

trohat: wow doing that just removed 4800+ games for me to

"Snoopy": I guess he has placed those waiting games before, when he was somtehnig else than pawn ... He is now playing more than 1000 games, a bit much for a pawn ... I have added him to my blocked users so I dont see his invitations ...

nodnarbo: there must be a bug somewhere as this Robtoo is now a pawn so shouldnt be able to have any games in the waiting area

tippyc: as Vikings said I'm not sure if pawns can do this but in the same place where you can un-check anti-checkers games you can also say don't show un-rated games, which will get rid of every single game robtoo has in the waiting games area.

Vikings: i have nothing against the game, my objection is to the ridiculus amount of outstanding invitations he has

tippyc: I'm not sure that pawns have this option, but, if you don't like anti-checkers you can go into the game filter in the setting page and un-check that game and they will disappear for you

why does robtoo need 230 invitations for unrated anti checkers?

it looks like most of the bandwidth represented by those 5000 games is currently being wasted by robtoo. i guess he, like anyone else, has a right to post invitations to games, but isnt 200 a little much?

Purple: ROFLMBO - try it and let us know

wetware: Damn. It would be safer sending Fencer cash in a plain white envelope with block letters on the outside saying "CASH INSIDE" in both English and Czech. LOL