 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 27. July 2011, 01:30:02 Subject: Re: 21. July 2011, 20:40:07 Subject: Re:  Artful Dodger: Come on now, Loons are beautiful birds! What did they ever do to YOU? 21. July 2011, 05:02:25 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: WORST president ever. I adamantly HATE him. EVERYthing about him. 21. July 2011, 04:42:43 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: Doesn't matter who it is though, I'm voting for WHOever runs against him. It is crucial to get this incompetent out. Anyone would be less dangerous 21. July 2011, 04:41:39 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: I'm a big fan of Shaun Hannity. He just makes sense to me. (Radio Show, I don't get to watch his TV show much) I hope we come up with someone good to go against Obama. I'm liking Bachman a lot! The libs are obviously getting scared, stooping to bringing up "migraine headaches". 21. July 2011, 04:25:25 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: I hope the tea partiers stick to their guns and don't give in to this "gang of six" crap that is trying to go through that incompetent Obama is clinging on to. Americans voted them in whole heartedly in 2010 for ONE reason. If they don't do what we want, they will be voted out too. I'm worried they are going to get wishy washy 21. July 2011, 03:48:31 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: She is definitely one of the dumber more annoying libs smackin her lips on the airwaves. I hate stupid people like her, that think they are so "on top of things" and continually get shown they are foolish. Not even brave enough to admit when they screw up completely. Ignores it completely. 17. July 2011, 02:06:59 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: I agree completely, but in all fairness, this is NOT the first time the debt limit has been raised. 2. July 2011, 21:55:00 Subject: Re: we coulda won (V): And one of many you lost 2. July 2011, 04:09:33 Subject: Re: Americans unaware of why we observe the 4th of July Artful Dodger: Wow that is totally pathetic. That's shameful. And of course some see that and then think all Americans are stupid. 30. June 2011, 20:24:24 Subject: Re: Obama's failure? Übergeek 바둑이: I stand by what I said. The answer is fixing the loop holes, NOT RAISING taxes. And the bigger more important part is lowering spending significantly. Obviously there is nothing I can say to convince you and other libs otherwise, and there is nothing you or them can say to convince me otherwise. 30. June 2011, 15:26:22 Subject: Re: The "rich" already pay more than their share of the taxes. (V): Are you for real? You'd like to see proof (official notes/docs/site) ??? LOL. I am an average person, typing on a discussion board on a game web site. This is NOT the floor of congress, and I don't even know you. And, unlike some people I don't have all day to Google everything. However, just to entertain you  I took a quick minute and found this article. Is it skewed to the right? Quite possibly. Is it a few years old? Sure is, but things haven't changed much since 2007. I don't care, frankly. It's really common sense anyway. http://www.american.com/archive/2007/november-december-magazine-contents/guess-who-really-pays-the-taxes 30. June 2011, 15:20:56 Subject: Re: Obama's failure? Übergeek 바둑이: Well the problem with someone like G.E. is taken care of by fixing stupid tax loop-holes. NOT increasing taxes. Increasing taxes will just have G.E. finding loop holes for that too. 30. June 2011, 00:45:47 Subject: Re: Obama's failure? Übergeek 바둑이: Personally, regardless of what party is in Congress, or what party is in the White House, I'd be "bullying" to cut spending. It's not a middle school playground. It's time to stop blaming and crying about who did what. It's past time to FIX it. 30. June 2011, 00:41:56 Subject: Re: Obama's failure? (V): You go right ahead and raise all the taxes you want in the UK. We aren't the UK. We fought not to be over 200 years ago. The "rich" already pay more than their share of the taxes. We spend MORE than we should be. If we cut down to the bare minimum, and more is needed? Then MAYBE I'd agree that more taxes are needed. We haven't even scratched the surface of what spending needs to be cut though. Most of us are forced to live within our budget. The wasteful Federal Govt. needs to be forced to do the same. 29. June 2011, 20:28:31 Subject: Re: Obama's failure? Übergeek 바둑이: Actually, Obama added more to the debt, in his first 19 months, than all presidents from Washington to Reagan, COMBINED. So are you saying he and the Libs should be allowed to spend spend spend us into oblivion? Seems regardless of whatever blame games everyone wants to play, FORCED cuts in spending are VITAL.  24. June 2011, 01:45:16 Let's cut it with the name calling. It has been deleted, and all references back to it have been deleted. Thank you 3. June 2011, 18:22:58 Subject: Re:hypocrites Tuesday: Because YOU say so? Sorry, I don't turn to you to determine my various reasons for my views. Again, move on. 3. June 2011, 18:15:28 Subject: Re:hypocrites Tuesday: "Silly to use other people's actions as an excuse for not being a part of something. Just be honest for your reasons." 3. June 2011, 18:09:11 Subject: Re:hypocrites Tuesday: Disagreeing? How is calling me a liar, disagreeing? Disagreeing with MY personal reasons? It's not even close to the same thing as challenging someone about facts. Silly. Try a flame fellowship for that. Thanks. Back on topic, please. Thanks. 3. June 2011, 17:58:35 Subject: Re:hypocrites Tuesday: I have no clue why you feel the need to go round n round in circles. I stated what I felt, and beyond that, it doesn't (shouldn't?) matter to you. Move on, thank you. YOU are the one who felt the odd craving to call me a liar. 3. June 2011, 17:48:08 Subject: Re:hypocrites Tuesday: Who are YOU to say what my reasons are? You use your reasons for being part of a cult, I'll use mine for not being part of one. Unlike some, I don't care what anyone thinks of my reasons for being part or not part of something, so I have no reason to lie. Accept it or not. 3. June 2011, 17:14:35 Subject: Re:hypocrites Tuesday: Extremely silly comparisons. Not even CLOSE to being the scope of religion. Try again. Or really, don't bother. 3. June 2011, 01:28:46 Subject: Re: Übergeek 바둑이: Gosh, I'm no religion expert, but it seems like hypocrisy can be found in every religion. Seems reason enough to me to not be part of any of them! 28. May 2011, 16:36:04 Subject: Re:Republicans in this state are land owners, farmers, etc. and base their political beliefs on morality as you said. Tuesday: Griffith 28. May 2011, 16:27:24 Subject: Re:Republicans in this state are land owners, farmers, etc. and base their political beliefs on morality as you said. Tuesday: I know how to read. Don't start getting rude. You can replace "rednecks" and "non-rednecks" in what I said as well. 28. May 2011, 16:23:36 Subject: Re:Republicans in this state are land owners, farmers, etc. and base their political beliefs on morality as you said. Tuesday: "They"? You fail to mention that the reason "They" end up having to bring it up, is because a good bulk of libs accuse every one else of being racist for disagreeing with anything the incompetent man does. It's really the libs who play the race card. It has happened so much, I can understand "them" possibly feeling the need to start statements out that way. (It's not because he's black, but) 25. May 2011, 01:54:42 Subject: Re: Modified by rod03801 (25. May 2011, 01:56:48) Übergeek 바둑이: Not all (and I doubt even most) of the rich have "ill gotten gains". Do you consider it "better gotten gains" when it is taxed away from them and given to others? 7. May 2011, 03:52:46 Subject: Re: It must burn a little Artful Dodger: It was a job well done by the Navy Seals. Period. You are right. Obama did nothing. Except give the go ahead. Woopty doo. JUST THINK if he hadn't? Just think what would have happened then. He really had no choice. (Or the alternative would have been stupid choice and a nail in his coffin. No matter HOW great that would be). The aggravating thing for me is that if this was reversed somehow, the Libs would be acting the same exact way, and would find it all just as offensive. Ubergeek is definitely right about how polarized everything has become. I'm just as guilty lately. 1. May 2011, 00:38:09 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: That guy is great! I'll have to watch some more of his videos. 29. April 2011, 17:34:17 Subject: Re: what a bunch of morons Artful Dodger: It's amazing that people waste such time worrying about something like this. Makes me wonder if anyone got paid to do it. "leading academics" Please! 28. April 2011, 03:04:53 Subject: Re: Trump the Bozo Modified by rod03801 (28. April 2011, 03:06:26) Artful Dodger: My main goal will be to make sure he doesn't have another 4 years to destroy us even more. So, that means I won't necessarily vote in the primary for the person I personally like the best, but the person that I think has the best chance to beat the anointed one. If they are one in the same, PERFECT. But goal #1 is to get rid of this guy. It's sad, but it's SO important. I tend to go for the more Libertarian. But they don't usually have much of a chance. 27. April 2011, 23:00:42 Subject: Re: Trump the Bozo Artful Dodger: And let's not forget Thugs at polls intimidating people. 27. April 2011, 21:25:42 Subject: Re: Trump the Bozo Modified by rod03801 (27. April 2011, 21:25:53) Artful Dodger: I'm afraid if that was the ticket, it might be a sure win for Mr. Incompetent.  27. April 2011, 19:20:37 Subject: Re: Trump the Bozo Artful Dodger: Bachman/Palin 2012  21. April 2011, 03:22:02 Modified by rod03801 (21. April 2011, 03:22:57) Keep things to the subject at hand please, and not personal bickering. ALL of ya! Further stuff like that will be deleted.. blah blah blah... and if necessary, bans, blah blah blah. You all know it enough by now. 21. March 2011, 12:00:24 Actually, a few posts with some name calling and turning personally argumentative have been deleted. Back on topic without "fighting" please. 17. March 2011, 01:50:37 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: Good point. 17. March 2011, 00:11:15 Subject: Re: Hannity finally figures out a way to attack President Obama for the Japan quake The Col: Come on! Libs would be all over Bush if he was president and was spending weekends golfing, playing hoops, worrying about his basketball brackets with everything going on in the world right now. He is useless. Hannity is right. 10. March 2011, 04:20:36 Subject: Re: Tuesday: secretly? he does think he is the anointed one. I've said it ALL along and will continue to. WORST president in history. Even worse than Carter. 10. March 2011, 03:48:19 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: Let's hope so. We are doomed, if not. 10. March 2011, 03:20:35 Subject: Re: Am I disappointed with Obama? No, because I knew from the beginning that the US can NEVER close Guantanamo. Tuesday: Oh come on. According to Super Obama, it would be completely closed by now. Of course he is flip flopping. He is incompetent, face it. 10. March 2011, 03:12:00 Subject: Re: Am I disappointed with Obama? No, because I knew from the beginning that the US can NEVER close Guantanamo. Tuesday: His flip flopping on the subject (obama) just shows how he doesn't have a clue what he's doing. 9. March 2011, 20:51:28 Subject: Re: Am I disappointed with Obama? No, because I knew from the beginning that the US can NEVER close Guantanamo. (V): Sorry, I honestly don't have much sympathy (if any) for the people that are there. 9. March 2011, 20:39:14 Subject: Re: Am I disappointed with Obama? No, because I knew from the beginning that the US can NEVER close Guantanamo. But don't get me wrong. Bush was a bumbling fool too. 9. March 2011, 20:36:55 Subject: Re: Am I disappointed with Obama? No, because I knew from the beginning that the US can NEVER close Guantanamo. (V): And? So? Doesn't change the fact that he is inept and just making a mess of things. 9. March 2011, 20:27:44 Subject: Re: Am I disappointed with Obama? No, because I knew from the beginning that the US can NEVER close Guantanamo. Artful Dodger: Exactly. "Unrealistic" is an understatement. He is a complete amateur. I can't believe so many people voted for someone so Unqualified. It seems as though he is just stumbling through everything. 9. March 2011, 03:44:12 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: I hope someone decent runs. It's SO important to get rid of the anointed one. 3. March 2011, 00:31:01 Subject: Re: who apparently haven't even graduated high school. (V):  << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |