 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
13. November 2007, 13:47:17 Dear Fencer, would you like to read these board: http://brainking.nl/nl/Board?bc=6 where we are trying to solve the Cheversi advantage? 13. November 2007, 13:49:47 Subject: Re:  joshi tm: No changes to any game will be made until it is proven that it would be better than the original model. Practically proven. 13. November 2007, 16:12:22 Subject: Re: Fencer: I find fair enough that no game rules are changed unless there are pretty strong reasons to. But what procedure do you suggest for proving practically that a game can be improved ? "I've tried it with a friend and it was so much better" doesn't sound that convincing. 13. November 2007, 17:54:12 Subject: Re:  Fencer: Does that include currently incorrect implementations of games? 13. November 2007, 20:05:21 Subject: Re: pauloaguia: No, incorrect implementations are to be corrected. |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |