BrainKing - Discussion boards (BrainKing.com)

Moderator: Hrqls

, coan.net

, rod03801

BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com

List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.

Mode: Everyone can post

2. July 2006, 00:08:35

Dead

show this user posts | show thread | link

doesnt realy matter how fast u r couse any one can go through all the boards in less then an hour so u dont need a window open for them all

2. July 2006, 00:11:59

Clandestine 1

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

deadbunnysRfun: This is true, but... if you keep all the windows open lets say for a month straight, will one achieve max points?

2. July 2006, 00:14:12

gambler104

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

pawnme: yes, but it will only create a minimal advantage.

2. July 2006, 00:14:29

King Reza

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

pawnme:Suppsedly yes. I cannot think of another way to get the maximom points. But I still find this kind of acheiving points rather funny!

2. July 2006, 00:26:23

Clandestine 1

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

King Reza: I agree with that. I would like to see something like: points for moving (as is now) but points for every win and points for a draw and even a point for a completed game (but this may also leave the door open to someone resigning games continuously to acchieve points). As for discussion boards, I understand the motivation to get everyone involved with Brainking, but I don't know if there is a "fair" way to moderate this.

2. July 2006, 00:32:47

gambler104

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

pawnme: I agree completely. I suggested the point for a win to Fencer and haven't heard back yet. I might like to see a cap on points for discussion boards at 60 for viewing and maybe create something for posting.

2. July 2006, 03:32:16

nightmagic

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

pawnme: no fair way, i ggree but nothing is fair.,only ones trying to beat the system from the start, so when all bugs are worked out it should start from the beginning for all.