Nombre de Usuario: Contraseña:
Registro de un Nuevo Usuario
Moderador: Vikings 
 Run around the Pond

Discuss about this new multiplayer game or comment current runs. (includes all versions of the game)

Game link..... Ponds
Ratings link..... Regular Pond Ratings -and- Dark Pond Ratings -and- Run in the Rain Ratings
Winners link..... All Winners - (Regular Ponds Only) - (Dark Ponds Only) - (Run in the Rain Only)


Mensajes por página:
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Peón.
Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
Buscar entre los mensajes:  

<< <   1 2   > >>
30. Enero 2005, 12:40:42
Crook 
Maxxina: I'd say 11 is 100% safe.

30. Enero 2005, 12:40:15
Crook 
They all logged in in the last three days, so maybe they will change their bids...

30. Enero 2005, 12:38:10
Crook 
Hehe, what do you mean? There are five autobids of 8 points. Should we bid 9, is it safe? :-)

30. Enero 2005, 12:36:59
Crook 
Sure. :-)

30. Enero 2005, 12:35:06
Crook 
My table is deleted. :-) I can't manage tables for all ponds (not even for the ponds, in which I'm participating), so I'm managing none. Why should I do Fencer's business? :-P

30. Enero 2005, 12:31:08
Crook 
Yep.

30. Enero 2005, 12:29:30
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (30. Enero 2005, 12:33:01)
Stevie: He is bidding 671, but he can actually bid only 500 points.

30. Enero 2005, 12:28:46
Crook 
This is correct, but I bet there will be at least one player with a bid higher than 500 points.

30. Enero 2005, 12:22:24
Crook 
I'm quite sure this is his last round, because it makes sense again to go for the bonus.

30. Enero 2005, 12:19:38
Crook 
Asunto: Alesh
Stevie: I'd say, first are all given points substracted from the pool, i.e. he has 0 points remaining, and *then* he get the bonus of 500.

28. Enero 2005, 12:22:00
Crook 
Yep. :-)

28. Enero 2005, 12:15:22
Crook 
:-)

23. Enero 2005, 18:17:50
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (23. Enero 2005, 18:19:55)
I'd like to be banned too. Would you please ban me for one week?

PS: Many thanks in advance. (I won't be able to thank after the ban, will I?)

22. Enero 2005, 12:55:48
Crook 
Neverthless I very appreciate EIHNs suicide (if I'm not wrong) by bidding the same ammount as Alesh. I'd say it helps a lot and is not affecting the game. Many thanks, EIHN! :-)

22. Enero 2005, 12:50:55
Crook 
Sure it makes sence. I mean Angelmouse with 6 points bidding is not so bad, because there are still enough [beeep] who mess up the game with his/hers suicides, but Alesh is deadly.

22. Enero 2005, 12:46:22
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (22. Enero 2005, 12:48:01)
Maybe even better would be to remove all pawn automatically from the ponds they eventually participate. But in the First pond they are really extremly boring.

21. Enero 2005, 13:20:43
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (21. Enero 2005, 13:22:19)
IMHO there is no cheating in this game, as long as nobody can see the real bids of the other players befor he/she bids. If somebody wants to use some computer programms, spreadsheeds, external advisers, Nostradamus' Prophecy or whatever, he/she should feel free to do it. Personally I can't imagine that it really guarantee a win. -- In the runs on the server where I played it initially, we didn't forbid even agreements between players - they didn't work anyway. :-)

21. Enero 2005, 09:45:01
Crook 
Chuck: If I'm not wrong, "your word" wasn't "ignorant", it was rather "idiot". :-)

20. Enero 2005, 11:22:46
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (20. Enero 2005, 11:23:14)
I'm affraid Ed has already left. He has solved the game, he knows that he's able to win every pond, why should he waste the time by playing it? ;-)

13. Enero 2005, 09:24:54
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (13. Enero 2005, 09:25:07)
I'm very surprised too, how low the most starting bids in several games are...

10. Enero 2005, 12:37:42
Crook 
Asunto: Re: Antiponds - new idea
Mely: Not bad.. :-)

9. Enero 2005, 01:54:27
Crook 
According the types of people and strong offtopic: I like "There are 10 types of people: those who understand binary and those who don't." :-)

8. Enero 2005, 22:31:06
Crook 
Don't forget to bid for the second round. :-)

6. Enero 2005, 13:39:30
Crook 
Ugh, better not... :-)

6. Enero 2005, 13:14:23
Crook 
Oh, indeed, with an unlimited number of runners... :-)

6. Enero 2005, 13:13:32
Crook 
What? A 21 day game?! :-o Have fun...

6. Enero 2005, 13:09:48
Crook 
Oh, the sleeping beauty Alesh is already a pawn. I suppose, he won't wake up even after he'll fall into the water. :-)

6. Enero 2005, 13:06:06
Crook 
Hm, the best tactics for the first run is obviously to bet constantly 5 points. There seem to be every turn some runners who are bored and bet suicidaly less than would be save. :-)

6. Enero 2005, 13:03:36
Crook 
Very funny. And what does it mean? What is the difference between Code1 and Code3? :-o

5. Enero 2005, 22:28:21
Crook 
It seems to be a good compromise, but I'm affraid there would be a problem. (I mean not for me and surely not for the majority of us, sitting in front of a computer 16+ hours a day :-))

Let's say, the deadline for a move is every 24 hours, at 1 pm. A player gives his bid shortly after the previous move, at 2 pm (23 hours before deadline), in the hope that he has 47 hours time for the next move and can leave for a trip or whatever (They say, there is a life outside... :-o). Unfortunatelly all bids will be given in the next 2 hours, the actual move will be done at 4 pm (21 hours before the original deadline) and the next deadline would be at 4 pm next day, 21 hours before our player originally thought...

(Aaaaarrrgghh, I hope you can understand my Pidgin English and what I mean... :-))

5. Enero 2005, 22:11:18
Crook 
Asunto: Re: Re:
Modificado por Crook (5. Enero 2005, 22:11:56)
Czuch Chuckers: Oh, sorry for misunderstanding the "starting pool", in this case I agree with you again. (I'd say more than 30 runners is rather a pain, but 200+ is sooo perverted that it's fun again :-))
Shorter time for a move -- in hours or minutes -- would certainly guarantee quick games and I'd probably participate, but I think on an e-mail game site (as BK is) is 1 day ok.

5. Enero 2005, 21:52:13
Crook 
Asunto: Re: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: I agree with you of course that it makes no sense to bid more than, let say, 510 in order to get the bonus of 500. But as you can see, there are people willing to bid much more. Well, if they want, it's probably fun. After every runner recognize that the difference between the bonus and his/her bid is much higher than the average bid, it will probably change. (In our run rather after Alesh will wake up/falls into the pond. :-)) I'm quite sure there will be the same (or similar) problem with any bonus. But maybe I'm wrong.

The smaller starting pool would speed the game? I don't know why, I think it's technically not possible (IMHO the lenght of the game is limited by the number of runners, not by the given starting points), but obviously some (you say "most") people seem to think so. Strange...

The game is boring rather because we started with 250 runners... (Is it really boring? Not really, it's a very very long run for sure, but I'm not bored. Are you?)

5. Enero 2005, 20:57:13
Crook 
Asunto: Re: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Why do you think the game will be more interesting after the bonus change? In which way? I'm affraid I didn't get the point...

5. Enero 2005, 20:25:26
Crook 
And many (probably thousands) German players...

4. Enero 2005, 16:05:15
Crook 
Asunto: Re: "resign"
Hmmm, I'd say it would be the best argument for the possibility to resign. Nobody is forced to bet 1 point if there are players with 0 point reserve. :-)

4. Enero 2005, 10:40:22
Crook 
Will it works if the order of the players is not the same as after the previous moves too? Or when some player changes his/her nick? I copied the first move in this way, from the second move I do it manually because I think it's less work and/or the result is better. Maybe I'm wrong, I'm not so good in computer matters...

4. Enero 2005, 09:19:56
Crook 
Well, I have to enter the moves manually, but it's done in a few minutes.

4. Enero 2005, 08:54:16
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (4. Enero 2005, 08:56:08)
Yep. But I'm afraid it will be quite large after several moves. It's simply exported from Excel with lot of unnecessary formating tags. I don't want to edit the table manually every two days. :-)

2. Enero 2005, 14:19:18
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (2. Enero 2005, 14:21:59)
I don't think too that we would be able to organize that. Either Fencer remove her or we (i.e. we, who read this board) know for sure that OldDear is betting 10 points. Actually I thought about it and I don't think that it will affect the game dramatically. Alesh is affecting it much more (sure, he can change his bid).

1. Enero 2005, 18:52:40
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (1. Enero 2005, 18:54:01)
Oh, the table is nothing special, it only lists all moves, ranks and difference in the rank to the previous move - from all players. Indeed, it is quite big (and large too)...

1. Enero 2005, 18:35:27
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (1. Enero 2005, 18:35:49)
rod03801: No, all the players with * in the table ain't certainly automatical moves from the last round, but probably all the moves in italics in this table. E.g. Alesh with his 1149 points. It makes any hunts for the reward senseless... ;-)

1. Enero 2005, 16:02:16
Crook 
Btw there are more people who bid automatically for several rounds. ;-)

1. Enero 2005, 16:00:25
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (1. Enero 2005, 16:03:05)
Do you really think, that everyone from about 180 people would bid 11 points even if we all would say we do? :-) I'm quite sure, there were some reward hunters with 12-20 points, some reward hunters with much more, and several people with an automatical bid from the last round (maybe with less points than 10). We shoudn't obviously care -- or take it as a 10 point hurdle/feature. :-)

1. Enero 2005, 13:20:27
Crook 
Thanks, I understood the meaning as "sh*t" (oh my God, please don't ban me for bad language! ;-)) or something like that. -- I'm not really sure whether an "automatic player" will affect the game so much, I'd say the most of us will for several future moves still bid less than 10 - and probably in the round, in which OldDear will fall into the pond, there will be even more 10s :-), bud I'd prefer to have such corpses removed immediately.

1. Enero 2005, 08:26:37
Crook 
Fencer: Although I don't understand the word "crock", I think I completely agree with Stevie. There should be really a way to remove her (OldDear/Mauve) from the game without affecting the other moves. :-/

30. Diciembre 2004, 21:20:43
Crook 
A "smaller pond that supports weekends, holidays, and vacation" will certainly take only few days. I'd suggest to run it with only two or three people and I'm quite sure it won't be boring.

30. Diciembre 2004, 18:51:44
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (30. Diciembre 2004, 18:51:58)
Do you think you won't be bored in the future games? Oh, sure, you can bet only 1 point again... ;-)

30. Diciembre 2004, 08:42:21
Crook 
Maybe a way to allow someone to "quit" the game, without having to commit suicide, could be implimented, Fencer? -- A very good idea!

29. Diciembre 2004, 13:48:27
Crook 
I like to run with someone who is bored and bets 1 point in the middle of the game. :-)

26. Diciembre 2004, 10:44:57
Crook 
Modificado por Crook (26. Diciembre 2004, 10:45:12)
Yep, there is a little bug somewhere, Fencer knows is already. The errorneous automatic move is in the case of TaureanTracker and CaoZ, too.
All moves in a table

<< <   1 2   > >>
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados.
Volver a arriba