 |
|
 Run around the PondDiscuss about this new multiplayer game or comment current runs. (includes all versions of the game) Game link..... Ponds Ratings link..... Regular Pond Ratings -and- Dark Pond Ratings -and- Run in the Rain Ratings Winners link..... All Winners - (Regular Ponds Only) - (Dark Ponds Only) - (Run in the Rain Only) No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Peón. Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 21. Enero 2005, 18:12:04 Asunto: hmmmm cant find Fencer comment..but This is when I checked.....and I couldnt see them at that point Stevie (ban | hide) Re: Re: 16. January 2005, 23:02:09
Thad: Yes, I was just asking Reply Edit Delete Thad (ban | hide) Re: 16. January 2005, 22:56:30 Stevie: Does that not make sense? Reply Edit Delete Stevie (ban | hide) 16. January 2005, 22:53:04 I take it that you can not see the discussion on a pond you are not in? Reply Edit Delete 21. Enero 2005, 18:10:00 Asunto: Re: Pedro Martínez: So can I, the other day when I asked..I couldnt 21. Enero 2005, 18:02:58 I definately put in a number over 15000 on that pond cos I dont the comment for discussion..then double checked my bid  why did that happen?
Fencer said before that we cant see the discussion of a pond we are not in...how come you guys and gals can??? something is amiss I would say Chuck..please stop the baiting..what happened to you is in the past 21. Enero 2005, 13:29:40 Thanks, but doubt he will..cos we asked this to be done to others before LOL 21. Enero 2005, 13:16:18 Asunto: Re: None of the players involved have complained about this fact so far. Pedro Martínez: I have
especially as i only stayed in the pond because Trice left. Then as I mentioned before...you only told us there was a person playing with his instructions, AFTER it started... I feel cheated already 20. Enero 2005, 23:07:09 Asunto: Re: Re: grenv: I hadnt thought of that LOL 20. Enero 2005, 22:59:28 Ed you are now on hide for 24 hrs for not complying. I would have pm'd you..had you not got me on enemy list. maybe you should have done as Walter did...and done as requested. 20. Enero 2005, 22:54:53 Asunto: Re: Pedro Martínez: Pedro, as far as we knew...Ed removed himself
Then AFTER the pond started..you anounced this Pedro Martínez (ban | hide) 20. January 2005, 13:18:57 So, the Run around the Jacuzzi is up and running. I received a PM from EdTrice saying he found a person who will place bets for him. Reply Edit Delete 20. Enero 2005, 22:18:04 My point is, the secret person has someone else helping. That is cheating 20. Enero 2005, 22:13:26 Asunto: Re: Re: Czuch Chuckers: If I played chess against you. How would you feel if I had Nomad for example..using a programme...telling me how and where to move? 20. Enero 2005, 22:08:10 I did not agree to have a secret person in the game I joined 20. Enero 2005, 22:07:49 I think it is wrong. I think the secret person is cheating, and action should be taken against Ed Trice and to the Secret person. 20. Enero 2005, 21:29:29 OK thanks
I noticed you mentioned ponds LOL 20. Enero 2005, 20:59:03 Redsales was off topic, he didnt get aggresive, whereas you have. Please remove the confrontational comments. Or the hide button is used for not carrying out the mods wishes
walter, I asked for us to stay on topic, if you want to get Ed into a game or more to prove who is best etc etc, can you ask him by pm please 20. Enero 2005, 19:29:14 Asunto: Re: And furthermore... EdTrice: Can you remove the attack / confrontational comment off your post please
And can we get back to the POnds also 20. Enero 2005, 19:15:35 So does this player getting advice on a pond game from Trice not constitute cheating? 20. Enero 2005, 09:30:50 Asunto: Re: paranoia redsales: LMAO@Redsales 20. Enero 2005, 01:48:03 Im in chuck....just make sure everyone does bid 1500 first round this time LOL 19. Enero 2005, 20:47:08 Modificado por Stevie (20. Enero 2005, 23:16:38) so you turn chicken and have left it I see
<sarcasm>  no-one expected that did they  </sarcasm>19. Enero 2005, 20:31:54 Asunto: Re: Re: EdTrice: I see it as you are trying to sidle out of your previous claims...if you remove yourself..then you are a loser to start with Ed, if you stay and lose..you will be less of a loser..if you win..we will be amazed and hail you as a new world leader 19. Enero 2005, 10:46:13 Asunto: Ed IF you win, youll be shouting " I am the greatest..bow down to me, my system works"
All I can see you doing WHEN you do lose, you will say " a few of you colaborated so as to make me lose" You will never admit that the loss was of your own fault or system failure 18. Enero 2005, 21:04:43 Asunto: Re: Re:and had the solver determine a bet placement ordering for me. EdTrice: what does that say?
Looks to me like the macro's and formula's etc etc are making the choices..not you A spreadsheet that is not helping is like the bad biiishop one...its just a reference chart 18. Enero 2005, 20:49:19 Thats using external programme help though....The user agreement says you are not allowed to do that 18. Enero 2005, 12:05:36 Asunto: LMAO Hrqls: (18. January 2005, 11:07:00) 18
The amount of times I have nearly done that myself and put my bid in discussion for all to see. Usually I realise before hitting submit    17. Enero 2005, 00:02:09 Asunto: Re: Re: Thad: Yes,
I was just asking 16. Enero 2005, 23:53:04 I take it that you can not see the discussion on a pond you are not in? 16. Enero 2005, 05:33:12 Asunto: Re: BIG BAD WOLF: was in round 6 of chucks 19000 minimum start game 16. Enero 2005, 05:31:15 Modificado por Stevie (16. Enero 2005, 05:32:02) no...to resign you choose 0, just like Mach Machovic did in one earlier 16. Enero 2005, 01:14:43 At least a resign button would allow everyone else to play normal and still have another player fall in etc. 15. Enero 2005, 00:01:19 I know we are all learning...
But do we really need to tell everyone how we can win a game? I feel its best to let things happen, and those that dont win...learn by what they done wrong 13. Enero 2005, 02:03:32 arrrrrrrrrghhhh someone bid same as me so neither of us got the bonus in czuchs pond :o( 12. Enero 2005, 01:59:37 I removed the same player twice now without saying anything LOL 9. Enero 2005, 02:16:06 Asunto: Re: Better English Pond Announcement on Main Page Walter Montego: Duration till next move
;oÞ 8. Enero 2005, 15:46:45 I guess it was part of the site down just a little earlier 8. Enero 2005, 13:26:16 Asunto: Re: I cant remember.. Fencer: Cool  I realised nothing would show yet...
But how will it work? 8. Enero 2005, 13:07:31 Asunto: I cant remember.. 5. Enero 2005, 23:25:55 Asunto: last post played with a bugle usually ;o) 5. Enero 2005, 23:22:02 Asunto: Re: Bad Bishop: That is ok Bad Bishop...thats what auto bid is for :oD 5. Enero 2005, 23:21:19 Asunto: Re: Eriisa:but I'm still brainless
no comment LMAO 5. Enero 2005, 22:15:59 As Bad Bishop says.....a site that is turn based wouldnt work with 10 mins or 1hr etc etc.
But if the other suggestion of a 1 or 2 day move..but if all have bid, next round comes into play...that would be a good compromise :oD 5. Enero 2005, 21:48:58 Asunto: Re: Where have I been? Czuch Chuckers: one started earlier as soon as maximum players were obtained. I think thats why it started LOL 5. Enero 2005, 18:35:08 LMAO...my finger was hovering...thought i had a chance to modglob a globmod LOL 5. Enero 2005, 13:34:46 Asunto: Fencer Are all pond games going to be 20000 points at start?
Or is it set so it is an amount relevant to the size of the group playing? Because 20000 for a pond of say 20 is a bit much dont you think for example << < 1 2 3 4 > >> |
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
|
|
Moderador: 
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados. Volver a arriba |