用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

18. 五月 2009, 23:13:06
Bernice 
题目: Fencer
I know it wont probably make any difference as you have already made up your mind.

I had a problem with them and was able to TELEPHONE a representative, and the problem was sorted over the phone.....below is what I get when I click on the "contact us" link.......



PayPal Customer Service:
1800-073-263


6.00 a.m. to 10.00 p.m. Monday to Saturday AEST




Identification preference
To help confirm that you're the account holder when you call, we have the following personal information on file:

Credit card number Change

Would you like to change your identification preference ?

19. 五月 2009, 00:15:30
alexlee 
题目: Re: Fencer
Bernice:
The phone number I had was 1-888-221-1161. I just dialed it and it is still Paypal.

19. 五月 2009, 00:16:33
Bernice 
题目: Re: Fencer
alexlee: yes mine is current for australia....sydney in fact.

19. 五月 2009, 00:46:55
Bwild 
题目: Re: Fencer
Bernice: I called them...but the rep (1st one) said to mail everything in.....2 weeks later...they had no record of me sending anything....3 weeks later...rep 3 said still nothing, and I cant revert back to a personal acct.

19. 五月 2009, 00:58:25
Bernice 
题目: Re: Fencer
Bernice修改(19. 五月 2009, 00:59:02)
Bwild: well I had satisfaction from them.....but the point I was making....Fencer was whingeing about not enough room to explain his predicament on their email page.....is he able to ring someone? everyone apparently can ring, or isnt there a Paypal "office" in the Czech republic?

19. 五月 2009, 04:25:53
Mort 
题目: Re: Fencer
Bernice: Maybe he just doesn't want to go through all the paper work. In the end the losers will be Paypal, as other and 'new' systems are available.

Sometimes it just ain't worth it if an alternative(s) do just as good.

19. 五月 2009, 04:36:56
Bernice 
题目: Re: Fencer
(V): Thanks for answering on Fencers behalf.

19. 五月 2009, 08:57:32
Mort 
题目: Re: Fencer
Bernice: Well... I can understand when you hit an organisation that denies it's made the mistake. I've been there... only to have them admit two weeks later that they did mess up. But they had annoyed me so much I went and changed to another organisation offering the same service... Turned out better for us as we now get more for our money

19. 五月 2009, 15:06:47
Czuch 
题目: Re: Fencer
(V): In the end the losers will be Paypal, as other and 'new' systems are available.

What are you saying??? The free market will work things out for itself???

...thought for sure you would advocate for the government to step in and make the evil paypal pay dearly for their bad business sense! Maybe even take over all online payment systems


Mayber we can move this on to the politics board.... have you explain to me the difference between the evil banks, who need the government to take over, or even your example of intel VS AMD, or online payment services??? How you can say in one breath thatpaypal will be a victome of its own bad business, but cant see that is how it should work for all businesses?

19. 五月 2009, 17:17:00
"GERRY" 
题目: Re: Fencer
Czuch: Maybe we should ask Fencer for a Better Business board & leave the politics out of it because we all know that there are not very good at running a sucessful busniness:))

19. 五月 2009, 18:00:02
Mort 
题目: Re: Fencer
"GERRY": These days there in no guarantee for anyone to be able to run a successful business. We've had sole traders that have been around for decades now having to shut up. Some quite honestly saying that there is no help for them, banks won't help them, and the government will not help them.

And their mistake.. being in a field that the market has contracted so much there is not the business to operate. Even the last market collapse re Thatchers' boom and bust economic policy didn't break them.

Then there was the need to introduce a charge of corporate manslaughter...

19. 五月 2009, 20:02:36
"GERRY" 
题目: Re: Fencer
(V): Isn't that the truth. I think the biggest concern over here is all the car company's

19. 五月 2009, 20:54:31
Mort 
题目: Re: Fencer
"GERRY": Over here.. it was how on earth could some people make such bad contracts and decisions without full information on those they were buying. I mean... You'd want to see the full accounts first wouldn't ya!!

19. 五月 2009, 21:28:13
"GERRY" 
题目: Re: Fencer
(V): I t all goes to the old saying would you buy a cart without a horse or are you going to pull it yourself:)))

20. 五月 2009, 02:31:05
Czuch 
题目: Re: Fencer
"GERRY": I always thought the old saying was "dont put the cart before the horse"?

20. 五月 2009, 03:31:12
Bernice 
题目: Re: Fencer
Czuch:

20. 五月 2009, 07:11:15
Foxy Lady 
题目: Re: Fencer
Czuch: Don't count the chickens before they hatch.

20. 五月 2009, 15:12:35
gogul 
题目: Re: Fencer
Czuch: No, Gerry is correct. The saying is there since the stone age.

20. 五月 2009, 17:05:02
"GERRY" 
题目: Re: Fencer
Czuch: LMAO & you know what though did don't you:))))

日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端