 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html Тук не Ви е разрешено да публикувате съобщения. Изисква се ниво на членство най-малко Мозъчна Пешка. Режим: Всеки може да публикува
<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 22. май 2006, 01:37:49 Относно: Re: Czuch Chuckers: Google toolbar is evil. 4. май 2006, 15:29:40 Относно: Re: Highest Rating mctrivia: Should be more like 100 though, problem is that the population of the site is small and many people are not that established, so 25 games here doesn't show as much as 25 games at a chess club against well established players. 2. май 2006, 15:27:45 Относно: Re: New chess variant nabla: Hostage Chess looks like fun, and it can be played on a regular board (unlike loop et al where the pieces change color). 8. април 2006, 21:13:09 Относно: Re: Statistics mctrivia: if the original number (0-1) was random then it wouldn't have that effect, unless 0 and 1 are not possible or something like that.
Would the result be less random than a real dice I wonder? 8. април 2006, 19:43:37 Относно: Re: Statistics mctrivia: Sounds like a bug in the algorithm to me, why would they program it like that? 6. април 2006, 22:15:50 Относно: Match Score Could we have the match score for a points/wins match above the game, the same way we do in a cube match?
Thanks. 6. април 2006, 04:02:15 Относно: Re: mctrivia: It's as silly as the whole "family values" nonsense the republicans keep driveling about. My family swears as well by the way. ;) 6. април 2006, 03:13:21 Относно: Re: ScarletRose: My family argues, so i'm not sure what "family oriented" is supposed to mean ;) 5. април 2006, 23:26:10 Относно: Re: Discussion Boards ScarletRose: Yes, wouldn't it be nice if there was a religion that practiced tolerance, or better yet respect, for other points of view. Sadly such a religion doesn't exist.
Therefore we should certainly have a religion board! What fun to see the arguments/fights/slurs etc by all the silly zealots. My vote is Aye!  3. април 2006, 07:04:51 Относно: Re: Autovacation mctrivia: I never quite understood the need for weekends at all. If you are working surely there's less time to spend making moves. 3. април 2006, 00:23:11 Относно: Re: Autovacation BIG BAD WOLF: I'll go along with the 5 day maximum, it would at least prevent people ignoring games for weeks on end. 2. април 2006, 23:53:09 Относно: Re: Autovacation andreas: autovac is silly. If you have a vacation you can set it up, no need for it to be automatic. Also, the game in question is a tournament. 2. април 2006, 23:33:16 Относно: Re: Autovacation Deceased: That's ridiculous. Since you can have 6 month memberships, that effectively doubles the vacation, which is too much already! 2. април 2006, 23:22:29 Относно: Re: Autovacation What's more it was 15 before and after timing out yesterday. If it's still 15 in 4 hours when he times out again then that would surely prove it? 2. април 2006, 23:21:34 Относно: Re: Autovacation Deceased: It was 15 about a month ago, and it's still 15. Maybe it went down and back up? 2. април 2006, 19:05:31 Относно: Re: Autovacation mctrivia: Well I have one particular opponent (you can probably figure out who - i only have 25 games going) who has been stuck on 15 vacation days for weeks despite timing out in our game almost every day. 2. април 2006, 04:08:22 Относно: Autovacation Ok, I'm totally confused by the autovacation feature. I'm playing someone who continues to time out against me every single day in a couple of games, yet his vacation days don't come down at all and haven't for weeks. Can someone explain how this is possible.
aarg. <feature request> Can we get rid of this useless feature please? Particularly since it seems to not be working. </feature request> 1. април 2006, 19:56:25 Относно: Re: close but not actually autopass mctrivia: Better implementation too, all the moves happen with one click, instead of having to cycle through the games. 1. април 2006, 19:49:49 Относно: Re: close but not actually autopass mctrivia: How about a button that says "Move now in all games I where I can't move" ? 1. април 2006, 16:48:19 Относно: Re: Daniel Snyder: I second that 13. март 2006, 02:18:20 Относно: Re: “practice board” mctrivia: I disagree, this is "play by mail" where it is common practise to play scenarios on a board before moving. I don't think that is cheating at all. 20. февруари 2006, 17:33:35 Относно: Re: Statistics ColonelCrockett: Also, the country I put up is my country of origin, not the country I presently live. 10. февруари 2006, 16:55:01 Относно: Re: The game GO Blackadder Mr K: I would start by beating your head against a wall. I've read several "rules" and am none the wiser. I second the question: Where can you get understandable rules on how to score? 2. февруари 2006, 01:45:49 I'm glad you guys cleared it up, i was beginning to really think the north and south poles were adjacent. 1. февруари 2006, 19:46:59 Относно: Re: playBunny:
Rule 1: Pedantic mathematicians have to make a saving throw each turn to avoid being sucked into a vortex. Rule 2: When there are no pedantic mathematicians left alive the game ends and we go to the pub for a drink. 1. февруари 2006, 16:38:25 Torus Shmorus. Does any of this actually matter? 29. януари 2006, 00:52:29 Относно: Re: alanback: I'm not convinced, after all there are other games (all the chess variations) where this should also hold true but doesn't seem to. 24. януари 2006, 22:42:09 Относно: Re: plaintiger: Do you have black curtains on the windows? What makes you think anybody actually cares a whit which pages you are currently viewing? What if they do? What mischief could I get up to just by knowing which game you're playing.
aarg. Privacy? Give me a break. 24. януари 2006, 21:51:21 Относно: Re: plaintiger: Fencer got it, I was just trying to feed the paranoia that leads to people choosing cloak mode.
and, by the way, when did * become the universal symbol for emphasis? 24. януари 2006, 16:50:29 I'd like a "stealth" mode, where I can see other people's bank account numbers but they can't tell until the money starts coming out.
Or maybe I could see exactly where people are physically so I can stalk them. 5. януари 2006, 21:08:37 Относно: Re: Language playBunny: Nobody speaks like BBC english except BBC reporters. It sounds terrible to my ears. 28. декември 2005, 15:46:55 Относно: Re: App mctrivia: Even so, it can't log in if you're not online!!!
Myabe you meant "logged in" rather than online? 28. декември 2005, 04:26:40 Относно: Re: App mctrivia: If you're not online how would the application know about your games? 21. декември 2005, 22:03:23 Относно: Re: Pedro Martínez: "not unambiguous" is close to not being an unambiguous phrase in itself in fact. 21. декември 2005, 18:31:47 hmmm. After some searching it seems that as long as gambling is not your actual business it may be ok to gamble on line against other players who are also not profiting from the business.
Not really tested in court though, but that seems to be the best guess of several web sites i looked at. 21. декември 2005, 18:10:51 Относно: Re: Brainbank - money for matches.... mctrivia: Maybe it's ok if you can't cash out and the money is used to pay for membership, and if the amounts are kept small it probably wouldn't be targetted.
The site itself would fall under Czeck law, so Fencer would be ok. It would be technically illegal for U.S residents to use it from inside the U.S however. 19. декември 2005, 23:46:48 Относно: Re: In-game notes reza: I second (or third) the suggestion to have a single in game note and be able to edit it.
And you did good finding the grammatical error. Some of us english speakers should've went to class more often. 12. декември 2005, 02:23:33 Относно: Re: a simple but fun strategy game would be fun pgt: Shmexagon 12. декември 2005, 02:14:55 Относно: Re: a simple but fun strategy game would be fun WhiteTower: In the end it's just a system of accepting mouse clicks on certain images. The hard part is not the image map itself, but the fact that every possible board layout would need to be implemented, instead of every combination for a particular square. For this reason I think we need a board that can be drawn by joining parts.
Perhaps turning the board slightly to align the hexigons, and then making the "active" part of each square in the middle? Or something like that. 12. декември 2005, 02:02:28 Относно: Re: a simple but fun strategy game would be fun mctrivia: you mean coordinate mapping. I was about to say the same thing :) 12. декември 2005, 01:39:37 Относно: Re: a simple but fun strategy game would be fun nobleheart: I've played slay many times. Very good game, a lot of strategy, but simple to learn.
While you're at it try dino-football. Very addictive. :) 10. декември 2005, 19:03:08 Относно: Re: Fencer: You should have underlined tha reply for emphasis. 5. декември 2005, 23:14:37 Относно: Re: Logout link wellywales: That's what I meant by shared computer, but again: closing the browser does the same thing doesn't it? 5. декември 2005, 23:10:35 Относно: Re: Logout link rod03801: I still don't get it. Unless you're on a shared computer I guess. Even then you just need to shut the browser, why bother clicking logout? 5. декември 2005, 22:56:37 Относно: Re: Logout link playBunny: There's a logout link? 4. декември 2005, 04:03:06 I agree, good luck at the start of the match is enough. It is one match, no need to keep saying good luck each time.
I'm not really bothered by it, but if I don't return the "gl" mid match you'll know why. 30. ноември 2005, 15:25:07 Относно: Re: While I'm on the subject alanback: I agree, I hate getting all those messages in the middle of a match. It's ONE match. Send me a message at the end saying I won or lost and that's it. 29. ноември 2005, 23:32:42 I don't get it, there is no information on the site to worry about, and as mctrivia correctly says, there is clearly no attempt to encrypt anything anyway. Haven't we had this discussion? 29. ноември 2005, 23:20:24 Относно: Re: Software Program ColonelCrockett: ? << < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> |
Дата и час
Приятели на линия
Любими дискусии
Дружества
Подсказка на деня
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Филип Рачунек, всички права запазени Нагоре |