Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   > >>
12. Luglio 2009, 13:30:03
gogul 
Argomento: Re: Labour party is equivalent
Pedro Martínez: "Liberals are conservative"

Wow finally. Over here even a radical can be a conservative. Taken by the roots of the words, I'm not ashamed to walk and talk with conservativism. I know enough so called leftists who have a conservative heart, allthough a rather nature loving like conservativism, things like fairness, let live and let die, stay cool, breathe before you talk. Of course it is appropriate to tickle the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie is willing to learn btw, yes yes I can see that, I'd call that a miracle if I didn't know it is bad conscience

12. Luglio 2009, 13:09:49
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
(V):"what happens to the millions of little people"

They'll be big enough to worry about them self and their loved ones. It is now these days where people slip through the crack so badly, while others shamelessly profitate. If you got enough for your self, then why not take responsability for somebody else? Why attempt huge academical constructs like socialism or liberalism when in fact it is so easy? I don't worry about little people, I worry about the label "little people". Great Britain is strong in "producing" little people, a real shame how your government (no matter who governs) have let fall people. Great Britain is very fragile at the moment, go a pay some Liverpool kids train tickets to London, Manchester, and then see the anger.

11. Luglio 2009, 16:40:12
gogul 
Argomento: Re: As for Obama
Czuch: Yes, the big fishes and welfare abusers are the same, undeserved priviledges.

11. Luglio 2009, 14:50:13
gogul 
Argomento: Re: As for Obama
Modificato da gogul (11. Luglio 2009, 14:53:13)
Übergeek 바둑이: The solution is let companies fail and let the economy take the hit and start over. Saving banks, car companies and monopolies wil not help working class people or small businesses, and it is from those segments of the economy that the recovery will come in the end.

Yes, I agree to that. For banks, the sentence "too big to fail" comes from people who are trying to protect their undeserved priviledges. To me it seems too obvious that the companies known for having cheated their balance and customers for years have to get cut off of the system, it would allow fair companies to take over the businesses. Problem seems to be that the justice isn't independent if it comes to the big fishes. I want the big fishes to starve so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so so much. Well high politics, justice and the big corporations, soon as it implodes this will be a real relief for the people (maybe not every single individual, but who cares, lazy times will be over then, GREAT!)

10. Luglio 2009, 13:55:22
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Tuesday: meow :-)

10. Luglio 2009, 13:46:56
gogul 
Argomento: Re: I love google!
Tuesday: Chevrolet? Rickenbacher?

10. Luglio 2009, 13:42:59
gogul 
It was around the 12th of June when guantanamo went Palau, a good solution for 17 Uyghurs. All that China had to protest (they only protest and do not have the power for more), these Uyghurs are suspected terrorists. Listen Chinese: We do not care about what you think.

10. Luglio 2009, 13:34:19
gogul 
Chinas contribution to the world problems (money, Guantanamo, trading) is none. They like to look hyper correct, but their way is abuse. They pest their environment to be able to deliver us their TRASH. Typical transgressors the chinese.

10. Luglio 2009, 12:20:06
gogul 
Argomento: Re:I would have destroyed his ego to start with.
gogul: This IS a grey wolf. China is selling rubish to the world, and even worse trash to Africa, and the Chinese want cash for that? No way.

10. Luglio 2009, 12:03:32
gogul 
Argomento: Re:I would have destroyed his ego to start with.
Pedro Martínez: Lets bust China. Get the Wall Street journal for background.

10. Luglio 2009, 11:31:59
gogul 
Love your craftsmen (Swiss culture).

10. Luglio 2009, 11:26:21
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Tuesday: Isnt it one and the same smile. It needs something in ones head to understand that those who lost an election (lets say the republicans with Obama) AND those who don't go to the ballot usually build the majority. Obama's no saint, he's under watch as everyone else too.

10. Luglio 2009, 11:20:07
gogul 
Argomento: Re:I would have destroyed his ego to start with.
(V): It should be brake, my bad.

Yes, destroy. Btw with care, not everything.

10. Luglio 2009, 11:12:46
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Tuesday: Demos are ment to protest ok. But it often enough makes not more than a silly 'I'm mighty'-smile on the faces of the transgressors. It's all about good mood, bad mood in this ugly circles. It doesn't need big demos to bring down the mood of a failed politician. It's all about mood. There is no violence needed, no stike, no masses needed IMO, I have my own ways.

10. Luglio 2009, 11:04:21
gogul 
Argomento: Re:I would have destroyed his ego to start with.
(V): And I can see that in political processes you usually break down. Why so? It's our job to make fire under politicians bums.

10. Luglio 2009, 10:58:35
gogul 
Argomento: Re:I would have destroyed his ego to start with.
Modificato da gogul (10. Luglio 2009, 13:44:08)
(V): I don't run away after I destroyed something.

Here's a bridge to politics please: brick by brick... I'm bored with it. It's called salami taktic over here, the Americans say filibuster I think.

10. Luglio 2009, 10:43:06
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Tuesday: Michael was fine, but if i would have been the one helping him, I would have destroyed his ego to start with. He didn't need the excess, nobody needs.

10. Luglio 2009, 10:35:14
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
(V): "Aww". its my very right to get over the past and to not bug anyone anymore with it.

10. Luglio 2009, 10:25:36
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Tuesday: Michael gave up his life to sharks, that is sad for this man. That is the lesson, make your own coffee yourself, choose the color of your socks yourself, wash yourself in the bathroom. Not the you and me kind of problems.

10. Luglio 2009, 10:18:42
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
You don't solve your problems by taking a look at mj's life. People who don't know how to get decent, I don't know. Should I care? All that michael can teach is a howto 'be a puffed up ego' in five steps.

10. Luglio 2009, 10:03:58
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
(V): This point comes as soon as your surrounding understands enough about TRANSGRESSION. Transgressive people are much worse than aggressors.

10. Luglio 2009, 09:44:16
gogul 
That's like the people who think that their spleens, little maniac tendencies, crazy ideas, their sweet depressions and all these bugs are tools to stress their surrounding. One day you come to a point where it is too late to solve your personal problems, and then you get the mess.

10. Luglio 2009, 09:37:57
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da gogul (10. Luglio 2009, 09:38:46)
(V): Right. there is michael, there are kids, there is his daddy and his family. Michael serves as an example of somebody who didn't see the need to solve his personal problems. Lost childhood the poor michael? Aww

10. Luglio 2009, 09:28:04
gogul 
Allright. That's nuts. Mj's life is a failure.

10. Luglio 2009, 09:11:39
gogul 
michael Jacksons music and life is politically irrelevant. A few interesting people died lately, how about McNamara. Michael Jackson is taking too much space on this board.

9. Luglio 2009, 12:05:13
gogul 
Modificato da gogul (9. Luglio 2009, 12:06:30)
Hu Gin Tao is too frightened to appear in L'Aquila. What a coward.

9. Luglio 2009, 12:01:43
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da gogul (9. Luglio 2009, 12:02:31)
(V): Nice one. Of course they say it's not important. The Murdoch group is dead and nobody cares?

I like to talk about the torture record of the Chinese KP. chinaemb_ch@mfa.gov.cn

9. Luglio 2009, 03:09:01
gogul 
Some very silly figures waste their time again somewhere with no outcome. Europe is made to experience a economical crash. Green and wet as good as everywhere.

9. Luglio 2009, 02:53:12
gogul 
That one is funny. In Dubai they worry to get critisized by the media. Well, integrity trumps. Any counties who know any kind of restrictions regarding the press. How can they be taken seriously?

9. Luglio 2009, 02:44:04
gogul 
Can somebody paint a realistic picture of the Iranian forces. Because their propaganda is something like a joke. They were 8 years in war with Irak, Irak had no army in 2003.

9. Luglio 2009, 02:21:20
gogul 
Israel and the finance sector have this in common: good kernel and infraction, transgressio, misdemeanor, violation, infringement, breach, trespass. Their heresy is to own as much as possible.

7. Luglio 2009, 12:50:16
gogul 
Argomento: Re: It's a relevant argument.
(V): What I wanted to say, with a single "nope" written in a post you waste the time of those who can make up their own minds.

7. Luglio 2009, 12:45:47
gogul 
Argomento: Re: It's a relevant argument.
(V): Indeed.

7. Luglio 2009, 09:13:38
gogul 
Hu Jintao, you'll be one of my toys

Have some nice times (time?). Don't neglect your diary :)

7. Luglio 2009, 08:53:17
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da gogul (7. Luglio 2009, 08:57:46)
gogul: Julien, say how it is. Lame politicians? That should be : the lame prosecutor of a certain Canton.







Heulen und Zähneklappern

7. Luglio 2009, 08:49:01
gogul 
It's no venting mood, just a cross over of stupid political minds. Steinbrück made jokes about swiss banking? Jokes? I really hope somebody brings the UBS down. It is in certain critical parts a criminal institution. Nobody raised objection when the Americans called out the UBS, juridicaly not totaly correct. As swiss politicians are lame in this matter, seems that Americans have to prove the accusation.

7. Luglio 2009, 07:07:44
gogul 
Modificato da gogul (7. Luglio 2009, 07:13:01)
The german Peer Steinbrück worries about a worse credit crunch for the next months (globaly). Who the heck needs credit? Eat stining nettle.

I hate it like pest if politicians worry the people for things which are problems of their criminal finance sector.

7. Luglio 2009, 06:46:29
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Tuesday: Nirvana = purgatorial fire ? ;)

7. Luglio 2009, 06:33:51
gogul 
This Chinese government could get powdered to Nirvana. Nobody would miss the chinese KP.

7. Luglio 2009, 06:20:38
gogul 
About time that the Han learn a little something how to treat minorities. Welcome.

7. Luglio 2009, 06:16:42
gogul 
A little dash of colour, not ment to interrupt this interesting conversation going on, but..

In China the Uyghurs make troubles. Why? The systematic acts of caprice of the Han Chinese are simply not acceptable.

6. Luglio 2009, 23:34:28
gogul 
Argomento: Re: out of six D's + time, you stick to two
(V): Nope. I work with words which I build to sentences. I admit that I'm funnier than most in doing this.

6. Luglio 2009, 23:09:47
gogul 
Argomento: Re: It's a relevant argument.
(V): Its a waste of time to post a "nope" in my opinion. What?

6. Luglio 2009, 23:02:44
gogul 
Argomento: your attention please
Modificato da gogul (6. Luglio 2009, 23:07:18)
In 2007 Romano Prodi announced the '09 meeting to happen in La Maddalena, a island in between Sardinia and Corsica. Fabrizio Ciccitto from the party 'Forza Italia' wasn't happy: "Its obvious that Prodi wants to seal off the party to prevent an attac of violent demonstrators and extremists". Too funny not.

Ok, Silvio had an idea... ................ ....... OMG this strange dude is still developing ideas. The party happens in L'Aquilla. A earthquake ruined the town in April (it was I think). Berlusconi visited the place, and said into a camera that the people here should just take it as a camping vacation (over 300 dead). The town would be rebuilded soon. Lately he said into a camera that this is happening, which is a lie. Well, ok, party in L'Aquila... Berlusconi hopes for international help to rebuild the little town (yes he said that, and he loves to show up in front of cameras the ugly guy). Well, it's a mess. L'Aquila seems to have other things to do than get flooded by a massive policeforce. The people from L'Aquila living in tents, people who do not trust the next winter, are not amused. Pictures like Bush showing up with New Orleans, does the world needs to see this kind of awful manipulation 2009 in L'Aquila with Berlisconi? Is that boring

29. Giugno 2009, 20:18:41
gogul 
Argomento: Re: Political board game for V & AD lol
(V): To me, all is about up or down. Look, the whole board is underneath.

29. Giugno 2009, 19:22:33
gogul 
Argomento: Re: Political board game for V & AD lol
Dark Vamp: What do I owe them?

29. Giugno 2009, 18:34:05
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Artful Dodger: Its summertime northhalf, it's living up the meadow time.

29. Giugno 2009, 16:42:06
gogul 
I love Sly & The Family Stone.

29. Giugno 2009, 16:41:19
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Tuesday: Well yes. Matthew.

29. Giugno 2009, 11:54:43
gogul 
And BTW. The Iranian Siemens clickers found us!

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   > >>
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio