 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
28. March 2009, 16:39:57  If you put in 9/11 conspiracy crap into google, you get a bunch of hits. I'll bet they all heard the story about Alex's quote! More evidence! 29. March 2009, 00:06:49 Subject: Re: Modified by Bernice (29. March 2009, 00:07:05)  Artful Dodger: I thought he was talking crap, but thanks for the heads-up ROFLMBO 29. March 2009, 00:15:40 Subject: Re: Bernice: It's one thing to make a claim with evidence, it's another thing to make a claim with no evidence and tell others to wake up and smell the coffee. Something smells alright and it isn't the coffee.  29. March 2009, 04:00:21 Subject: Re:  Artful Dodger: It's Zanes diaper! LOL Whew! 29. March 2009, 11:43:44 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: Early morning guff?? Seriously though... It would be nice for a full investigation to take place. Just to put minds at rest.... or at least by close observation of those giving evidence to see if the wool has been tried to be pulled over our eyes. Some small investigations have taken place over here, and revealed that certain elements of what we were told before going into Iraq were false. Unfortunately it wasn't in the enquiries remit to go deeper. 29. March 2009, 15:53:30 Subject: Re: (V): revealed that certain elements of what we were told before going into Iraq were false Finally, first time I remember that you didnt use the word "lied".... there is always false information, all the time, everywhere, but it is a huge leap to accuse of lies and conspiracies. 30. March 2009, 07:39:44 Subject: Re: Czuch: Sorry.. I'll remember to use the word lied to. It's more accurate in this case, We were told that Saddam could attack UK bases in 45 minutes.... that was a lie. .... A deliberate one. 30. March 2009, 05:31:43 Subject: Re: (V): Do you mean an investigation of the events leading up to the war in Iraq? If a trustworthy investigation could be conducted, I wouldn't oppose that. But what can be accomplished by it? I'd rather see a complete revamping of the US's foreign policy with respect to military presence in other countries. We have plenty of probems on our own soil and ought to be attending to those first. I don't know what a good Foreign policy would look like but I think we can do much better. 30. March 2009, 07:42:13 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: More honesty in Government, and hopefully certain agencies in the USA finally reigned in. And to see if your government is being controlled by others directly and indirectly. |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |