Moderator: Vikings

Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.

All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!

*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."

List of discussion boards

Mode: Everyone can post

Show oldest messages first

13. October 2009, 07:54:00

Papa Zoom

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

Bernice:

Government’s £16bn sale of public assets causes cross-party anger

Brown announces £16 billion asset sell-off

Brown unveils £16bn assets sale

British PM Brown to announce assets sell-off

And notice my question "So what do UKers think of this idea?"

Besides, I wasn't making a statement. I was asking for opinions on the UKs strategy. But all V offered was an ad hominem.

Most stories that get covered by Fox don't get covered by the other cables or networks (exception is CNN that does a fair job...but only fair). Since the majority of viewers watch Fox, then it follows that the complainers are in the minority. And we all know that when you don't have an counter argument, just attack Fox with sarcasm and make unsubstantiated claims against them. Or in this case, just make stuff up.

And to be clear, two of the above sources were used by Fox news in their report. One was the BBC.