 |
|
 ChessChess Discussion For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 23. May 2005, 03:06:26 Last weekend there was a Gothic Chess tournament at the University of Tennessee. I had heard about it on the radio and in the paper and it's only 40 minutes from my house, so I drove by to have a look. Nicely organized event with lots of friendly people playing Gothic Chess (i'd say 100 or more). I did catch a glimpse of Ed Trice walking around playing what people were telling me was a "simul". There were 12 people playing Gothic Chess against him at the same time and he won all of the games. Quite a cutie too if I must say so!! I am not the biggest chess fan, but I think you all have some strange sort of jealous thing going on. Lighten up! 22. May 2005, 23:55:36 Subject: Alex Go here http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=82147 scroll down and you'll find a link to your game. 22. May 2005, 23:31:18 Subject: Re ughaibu: Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 23:33:19) last time he prevailed as we know ... his lost game vs caissus vanished under
mysterious circumstances not only from the backup after a server crash, but also from the why so bad memory of that hopelessly busted representant of infidelity ... ~*~ 22. May 2005, 23:27:35 Subject: Matarilevich But will I still be married by the time that game finishes? 22. May 2005, 23:23:47 Modified by Kili (22. May 2005, 23:28:53) I bet you a coffe that Alex will win this game against Ed Trice :) 22. May 2005, 23:15:21 The game with Trice? Of course it's a joke. I'm publishing that game at http://www.chessgames.com/index.html do as you like. 22. May 2005, 23:15:06 Subject: Re: Alex: Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 23:16:00) if some of the really pity occurances here would
be marked as joke after all, many of their naturally misleading self-defintions could indeed be funny yet. ~*~ 22. May 2005, 22:59:17 Subject: Re: Alex: nobody will tell it you ... you will have to check it out yourself ... come on! or is it too difficult? ;-) 22. May 2005, 22:57:37 Subject: Re: why no comment Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 23:03:50) Alex: well I repeat it slowly for you:
no I won't comment - the game is still in progress and only cheaters or less serious players would interfer now apart of technical statements. - As soon as you have won . ~*~ . it though, respectively were bored to death by that staller/spammer, I shall have my say. 22. May 2005, 22:49:26 Subject: Alex I am a part of this game playing community as are you and Trice, our behaviour reflects upon each other. 22. May 2005, 22:48:00 I´m not understand why nobody no comment this game? 22. May 2005, 22:44:39 Subject: Re: ughaibu: no I won't comment - the game is still in progress.
as we know only pertinent cheaters would offer their services at analysis during a running game to sabotate serious players on gameservers ... ~*~ 22. May 2005, 22:25:40 Subject: Re: Alex ughaibu: Muzio gambit 49 move. 22. May 2005, 22:10:02 Subject: ughaibu Do you think, game between me and EdTrice will be draw? 22. May 2005, 22:00:11 Okay. Chess players have to suffer draws in any case. 22. May 2005, 21:58:03 Subject: Re: ughaibu: The game Trice-Alex does not affect that what I wrote when I offer a draw.
Well, in the game Trice-Alex a draw offer all three moves wuould be strange enough, yes ... but this can not be prohibited in my opinion. draw offer every move should be only prohibited. but maybe worth to look at: a checkbox such as "i do not accept draw offers" ... 22. May 2005, 21:51:38 Subject: Re: ughaibu: when i offer a draw, then it i do it because
a) i mean the position is in my opinion equal and a1) the tournament can be done with the draw (depends on my rank) a2) i am playing against a strong player and it is such as a "leading question" ... just to know a little bit more what the opponent want ;-) b) i am in a better position bt in the tournament/match this is enough 22. May 2005, 21:40:07 Generally it's bad manners to offer a draw in an inferior position, in effect this means that if a draw offer is refused the opponent thinks that their position is better, ie no consecutive draw offers by either player. 22. May 2005, 21:37:52 Subject: Re: Re: danoschek: in my opinion 10 moves are too long - maybe 3-5 is worth to look at ... 22. May 2005, 21:34:15 Subject: Re: Re: chessmec: not a bad idea either ... I would suggest TEN moves distance though. ~*~ 22. May 2005, 21:32:56 Subject: Re: Re: danoschek: that is worth to look at ... draw offering privileg alternating between the players, but what about a simple draw offer privilege only two moves after then you offered a draw? 22. May 2005, 21:31:00 Subject: Re: ughaibu: it would be sufficient to make the
privilege of offering draw alternating between the players. ~*~ 22. May 2005, 21:28:43 How about deducting 50BK for each draw offer? 22. May 2005, 21:24:41 Subject: Re: to all serious players danoschek: Maybe some people do not understand that perpetual-draw-offers are for chessplayers not only unsportsmenlike ... against the whole game.
i think the experienced chess players here know the worth of a draw-offer, often done as a leading question, but never perpetual. altough we are playing here "virtual" draw offers are useful for psychological playing here too ... as I said: I do not like draw spammers (some from the first move in the game!) 22. May 2005, 20:56:31 Subject: to all serious players Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 21:09:32) since on features request a self-appointed "preselector"-bully disgruntles all useful
suggestions, we could need some more sincer votes who clearly state their opinion against notorious, perpetual-draw-offer spammers supposed to be encouraged there ... ~*~ 22. May 2005, 20:32:01 I'm going to post a thematic chess tournament, winners will be those to first double rooks on the 7th, no draws. The tournament'll be entitled "blind pigs" and'll be co-dedicated to the global moderators and the cloak facility. 22. May 2005, 16:08:50 Subject: Re: Re:  ColonelCrockett: If you take a look there's more of us pawns then there is of them ;) So no need to feel "inadequate".
Good luck for your prized tournament 21. May 2005, 21:33:10 Subject: Re: Re: ColonelCrockett: you go uhhmm - candidate ...  ... ~*~21. May 2005, 21:21:49 Subject: Re: Re: danoschek: good, I'm already fighting feelings of inadequacy looking at all these rooks and knights (and comparing that with my lowly pawn) LOL 21. May 2005, 21:19:54 Subject: Re: Re: ColonelCrockett: yes it is ... ~*~ 21. May 2005, 21:17:16 Subject: Re: Chessmaster1000: so it is theoretically possible for someone to win membership (without having ever been a member before)? 21. May 2005, 21:06:56 Just kidding as i said................ 
You don't have to pay anything.....! Except if at the tournament notes there is a different statement. But that would be ridiculous and i haven't seen anything yet....... 21. May 2005, 21:00:45 Subject: Re: Chessmaster1000: can someone else verify this 30 Euro? 21. May 2005, 12:00:08 Hey! Just kidding, i'm not a fool that paid these money..........
(I received a mail saying i'm an idiot that paid 30 Euro, because when you win you pay nothing and since free membership cost less than 30 Euro, what's the reason to participate if you are about to pay more than that you win? The person who sent it must not have a sense of humour or must be a complete idiot!----Sorry......) 20. May 2005, 22:11:02 Subject: Re: prize tournaments ColonelCrockett:
30 Euro if you win......... 20. May 2005, 22:08:09 Subject: prize tournaments do the prize tournaments (where you play for "free membership" cost anything? 17. May 2005, 21:56:58 Subject: oh okay Modified by danoschek (17. May 2005, 21:57:42) I cAn clarify: it was double-plus ... 
conductor,  a welcome suite for our new bk comrades please
.............  ...    ... ~*~17. May 2005, 21:53:57 Subject: Re: errr danoschek: plz clarify this message, I'm not an expert in double-speak. :) 17. May 2005, 21:49:30 Subject: Re: errr Modified by danoschek (17. May 2005, 21:51:16) ColonelCrockett: oh yes ... it was not me who mentioned any trouble - remember.
the sensible thing with some associations is they grow over a controllable size, we had that here too: the KMs, after a while stats strike, there's always someone crossing lines ~*~ 17. May 2005, 21:45:26 Subject: Re: errr danoschek: as I recall, you and I got along just fine . . . what do you mean by clattergang? 17. May 2005, 21:44:25 Subject: Re: errr chessmec: IYT = itsyourturn.com 17. May 2005, 21:42:09 Subject: Re: errr Modified by danoschek (17. May 2005, 21:46:12) ColonelCrockett: oh I see, your memory has still not improved ... I was
the guy who never was with some one unless in spirit, not like your clattergang ... 
btw how are the nicer folks who try to avoid trouble, like tal for instance ? ~*~ << < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
.... ~*~ 
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |