 |
|
  ChessChess Discussion For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 > >> 25. June 2005, 03:00:39 Subject: Irrigardlessly I assume Modified by danoschek (25. June 2005, 03:06:04) we had spotted all edges of imaginable systems exhaustingly - furthermore there was
not too much to add anyway. After our dear comrade from a twig on the branche of the lost tribes acchieved that very nicely as I bet, we may return to the real game in peace. ~*~  25. June 2005, 02:33:55 Subject: Re: discussion boards Bluefin: hehehe  now that you mention - indeed ...
well unlike the 10x8 variation board it is still serious after all ... ~*~ .  23. June 2005, 13:35:08 Subject: Re: a valid point Modified by danoschek (23. June 2005, 13:35:37) redsales: it may be that you play 30 games but won't finish a single one
within a month ... the "taxes system" mustn't get effective without delay thus ... ~*~ 22. June 2005, 16:18:48 Subject: removal is humbug anyway only penalty rating is debatable if we wish to stay serious. ~*~ 22. June 2005, 16:02:17 Subject: Re: rating systems and the BKR Stormerne: right - no contradiction.
I just meant the idea of additional vacancy days as demanded to be buyable on another board by stallers ... ~*~ 22. June 2005, 15:50:58 Subject: Re: rating systems and the BKR Modified by danoschek (22. June 2005, 15:56:01) Stormerne: sounds like a very good idea to me ... vacancy should halt
it though - and if the silliness of buyable vacancy days for stallers is put into trash where it belongs instead on discussion boards I second unconditionally ... ~*~ 22. June 2005, 13:04:57 Subject: I too think it's still ok who takes the dodgers serious anyway
and perhaps a little adjustment by penalties for timorous inactivity in the top will do the job. ~*~ 18. June 2005, 08:35:14 Subject: ed trice dodged any serious competition I see only a dustball left by him when I appear on
a chessboard: tuc tuc tuc-tuck ... panic !  while
it seemed just obligatory for me to challenge unrated Mely. - nuff said.  ~*~16. June 2005, 00:25:55 Subject: mely had a high random start indeed but he earned all the points in aftermath, you may believe ... ~*~ 28. May 2005, 06:26:47 Subject: as I said it was rather intuitive Modified by danoschek (28. May 2005, 06:27:56) since the king could not take d2 after the check, the rook a1 was safely out.
'worst' line I had on my board indeed was 17)Nf4 Rad8 18)Ncd5 Nd4 19)Ng2 Qf2 20)Be3 Qf3:+ which I took as good enough - you may say I calculated 7 moves deep. ~*~ 28. May 2005, 04:29:16 Subject: Re: miles doublegambit WhisperzQ: basically the sac ensured that I kept playing with a rook more ... 
but I was particulary pleased that it was even beyond consideration for the fritz 7 although the platebox was able to proove the correctness of my attack meanwhile ... ~*~27. May 2005, 22:39:19 Subject: miles doublegambit Modified by danoschek (28. May 2005, 02:36:36) Already scored me many nice games in quick-tourneys and even in correspondance.
Got it for a first time at brainking now, have a look at the culmination point of the game It seems that pressure play could win it prosaic ... but we are here for fun right ? . ~*~23. May 2005, 23:18:08 Subject: Re: CindyInTN: grrrrr it's nothing naughty ...
I replied more extensively in private so my pleasance toward your ladyship is not decreased too much I hope by returning to chess here. ~*~23. May 2005, 18:36:29 Subject: Re: CindyInTN: please be fascinated on the 10x8 discussion board ...
btw I play 12 blind simultane against chess beginners and win all too. seems without vortex (or did you see a bushbox on his back ?) he's a bit timorous. ~*~ 23. May 2005, 18:31:38 Subject: oh no now I remember right ... 0:) Modified by danoschek (23. May 2005, 18:34:10) I apologized to fencer that I am no buttkisser hence have to correct his statement.
the average mod of course got into position by buttkissing only, not by social skills so I can't even fix it to who of the embarrassed dweebs urged to an intervention ... ~*~ 23. May 2005, 18:24:28 Subject: Re: Re: Modified by danoschek (23. May 2005, 18:25:41) chessmec: yes - I was called insulting ... guess I used the word intelligence which
might of course be insulting for very stupid people who should not be mods though. like on the gothic board in earlier times when the word honesty was not welcome ... ~*~ 23. May 2005, 08:07:50 Subject: Re: CindyInTN: nobody is jealous about
a busted cheater. facts are just not negotiatable. ~*~ 22. May 2005, 23:31:18 Subject: Re ughaibu: Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 23:33:19) last time he prevailed as we know ... his lost game vs caissus vanished under
mysterious circumstances not only from the backup after a server crash, but also from the why so bad memory of that hopelessly busted representant of infidelity ... ~*~ 22. May 2005, 23:15:06 Subject: Re: Alex: Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 23:16:00) if some of the really pity occurances here would
be marked as joke after all, many of their naturally misleading self-defintions could indeed be funny yet. ~*~ 22. May 2005, 22:57:37 Subject: Re: why no comment Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 23:03:50) Alex: well I repeat it slowly for you:
no I won't comment - the game is still in progress and only cheaters or less serious players would interfer now apart of technical statements. - As soon as you have won . ~*~ . it though, respectively were bored to death by that staller/spammer, I shall have my say. 22. May 2005, 22:44:39 Subject: Re: ughaibu: no I won't comment - the game is still in progress.
as we know only pertinent cheaters would offer their services at analysis during a running game to sabotate serious players on gameservers ... ~*~ 22. May 2005, 21:34:15 Subject: Re: Re: chessmec: not a bad idea either ... I would suggest TEN moves distance though. ~*~ 22. May 2005, 21:31:00 Subject: Re: ughaibu: it would be sufficient to make the
privilege of offering draw alternating between the players. ~*~ 22. May 2005, 20:56:31 Subject: to all serious players Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 21:09:32) since on features request a self-appointed "preselector"-bully disgruntles all useful
suggestions, we could need some more sincer votes who clearly state their opinion against notorious, perpetual-draw-offer spammers supposed to be encouraged there ... ~*~ 21. May 2005, 21:33:10 Subject: Re: Re: ColonelCrockett: you go uhhmm - candidate ...  ... ~*~17. May 2005, 21:56:58 Subject: oh okay Modified by danoschek (17. May 2005, 21:57:42) I cAn clarify: it was double-plus ... 
conductor,  a welcome suite for our new bk comrades please
.............  ...    ... ~*~17. May 2005, 21:49:30 Subject: Re: errr Modified by danoschek (17. May 2005, 21:51:16) ColonelCrockett: oh yes ... it was not me who mentioned any trouble - remember.
the sensible thing with some associations is they grow over a controllable size, we had that here too: the KMs, after a while stats strike, there's always someone crossing lines ~*~ 17. May 2005, 21:42:09 Subject: Re: errr Modified by danoschek (17. May 2005, 21:46:12) ColonelCrockett: oh I see, your memory has still not improved ... I was
the guy who never was with some one unless in spirit, not like your clattergang ... 
btw how are the nicer folks who try to avoid trouble, like tal for instance ? ~*~ 17. May 2005, 20:54:54 Subject: hehehehe indeed and still I got the same elephante memory ... ... ~*~16. May 2005, 23:06:49 Subject: Re: purpose? ColonelCrockett: hi coennel, it's not iyt as you see ... looking for
opponents is integrated with chess analysis, the usual pubertarian swelling included ... just a special tournaments board exists yet, same as you're used to from before ... ~*~ 11. May 2005, 01:34:31 Subject: btw I suggest Modified by danoschek (11. May 2005, 01:38:00) instead of reflecting morals that were proven virtual and,
to avoid the interferences that make just nice patterns, a strictly optical approach by hiding humbug - new msgs ? I saw 3 of 9, then - appealing ! ~*~  11. May 2005, 01:30:45 Subject: Re: Re: chessmec: thank you for inspiring my next jokes board message. your reflection
of morales for sure must have been, irrigardless of judging its issue-related validity, just a good and funny example of an optical illusion aware of the source you cited ... ~*~ 11. May 2005, 01:19:12 Subject: Re: I'm confused Ed Trice WhisperzQ: oh wow - thanks for reminding.
there happened indeed nothing constructive yet, - and I won't comment the usual noise either ... ~*~ 18. April 2005, 23:36:44 Subject: Re: Best Move Chessmaster1000: I see Tarrasch is your idol,
but I truely believe in Lasker ... best move ... ... ~*~18. April 2005, 21:28:54 Subject: Re: My game Pafl: eheh ! I don't own my bilguer anymore but I believe
to remember that Qe7 had an exclamation mark in there ... ~*~ 18. April 2005, 20:11:59 Subject: Re: My game Pafl: The suggested 10) ... Nf5 seems more powerful at first sight indeed ...
I wouldn't have come into that line since I'd play 3) ... Qe7 in the classical way. Looking forward to s . chessmaster's analysis, - nice playground for programs.  ... ~*~16. April 2005, 12:08:45 Subject: a level game may occur with equally strong opponents ... as most chessplayers here know, I usually
try to make at least 40 moves which is about my impression of a full game, still I don't dare to claim that personal approach as to be obligatory in a world of individuals. ~*~ 16. April 2005, 05:10:37 Subject: although I evidently don't play on draw 5. April 2005, 17:00:26 Subject: mely massage indeed - he's the first one online ever who
played the b3 variation in the vulture sound and is giving me a hard time of abyss walk ...  ... ~*~  .  1. April 2005, 14:09:04 Subject: Re: Free internet chess server Caissus: fics is the real thing period. ~*~ 16. February 2005, 01:14:25 Subject: that scandinavian roboline reminds me Modified by danoschek (16. February 2005, 01:17:44) of chesschallenger 2 the first platebox against which I came to play.  . if you
didn't leave your half of the board it went for 3 repeats .. . a good opportunity
for a serious tip, 1)e4 d5, 2)ed Qd5:, 3)Nc3 Qa5, 4)b4!? is worth a look. ... ~*~21. January 2005, 23:06:09 Subject: that's the thrill nobody knows exactly how to play chess ... ...
perhaps a chess programm with mentor functionality is an option, as available http://www.chessmentor.com/download/download1.html ... ~*~ 19. January 2005, 22:21:44 Subject: a player should recognize a draw by competition.
the server could confirm it, player must claim. ~*~ 4. December 2004, 14:33:02 Subject: using someone else's games big deal - and even obligatory for serious players who don't want to be
caught in the same standard traps together with the average masses, permanently. I suggest to chose a less liked opening and to become a reference yourself, possibly. ~*~ 28. September 2004, 13:37:25 Subject: completely ? Modified by danoschek (28. September 2004, 13:50:58) I shall look over that due to the language barrier ... 0:)
got the fritz 5.32 in a games collection (15 CDs €5) and also as sponsor-cd in a magazine ... almost free :D rebelfritz works. ~*~ 28. September 2004, 01:16:29 Subject: Ed Schroeder Retired From Rebel-Development Modified by danoschek (28. September 2004, 01:18:15) The program - end of 2003 still sold as Pro-Deo ( $50 ) -
is freeware now ... It's downloadable from Schroeder's homepage - about 3.5 MB - the engine works in chessbase and chesspartner ... ~*~ 27. August 2004, 16:14:26 Subject: good summary Modified by danoschek (27. August 2004, 16:14:37) in my high time of correspondance in the 80s, people told you after all
whether they are using a program or not - during those years they could compete only with amateur-1-level though - usually rank 2-3 in groups - saw none winning. ~*~ << < 1 2 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
.... ~*~ 
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |