 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 15. July 2009, 10:56:19  (V): Domestic science is considered (in the saying, not the act) sexist thats so stupid ive never heard about that till now  ive got to ask the question why  15. July 2009, 10:37:24 Subject: Re: (V): yes but from what i understand basic common sense has flown outta the window we didnt have this problem in the sixties i was taught to bake from an early age and still do it now even thou im by myself do they actually have domestic science lessons in schools today? they have lessons for grown ups up here to teach them the basic skills on food. so makes me wonder why wasnt it taught to them earlier in there life 15. July 2009, 10:19:11 Subject: Re: (V)</b but you have to agree we are now a nation of wasters sadly an ever growing amount of ppl in the UK eat junk food on a daily buisness we live in a throw away society and have done since the late 50s we fast becomming a must have nation to esp the children 15. July 2009, 09:39:56 Subject: Re: (V): what bugs me is why the hell do we need sell by dates on such things has TEA BAGS 15. July 2009, 09:30:07 Subject: Re: gogul: i will agree with you on one bit of that post i was once at my local council incinerater dropping of things that where to big for normal refuse collection and i noticed large vans comming in and dumping their loads of cakes biscuits etc having done some work with the homeless so asked one of the drivers why they were doing this and his reply amazed me they had a couple of days left on them before sell by date expired and it was cheaper and easier to dump them than to gave them to the local homeless charities  12. July 2009, 00:26:16 Subject: Re: Labour party is equivalent Artful Dodger: that made me laugh  12. July 2009, 00:19:52 Subject: Re: Labour party is equivalent Bernice: ah but we have 3 main parties in the UK i let V fill you in with what they stand for..lol 10. July 2009, 20:33:53 Subject: Re:Very much so. You're about the only one making any sense of the MJ hysteria. Modified by Snoopy (10. July 2009, 20:34:46) Tuesday: the point im making if you honor one you have to honor them all and quite simply there isnt enough days in the year to do so..lol 10. July 2009, 20:27:41 Subject: Re:Very much so. You're about the only one making any sense of the MJ hysteria. Modified by Snoopy (10. July 2009, 20:32:14) Tuesday: but aren't there much more worthy ppl who deserve to be honored for doing hard honest work not just bbeinga pop star dodoesntake sense to me why hohonorim at all  10. July 2009, 18:27:57 Subject: Re:I would have destroyed his ego to start with. gogul: the whole Western world is guilty of selling trash to Africa in one form or another and we carry on doing so sadly because they are not in a strong enough postition to do anything about most of the Western worlds unwanted computers are send to India and China to be broken up in horrilbe conditions we know it shouldnt be happening and there are laws in place to stop it BUT it still is happening 10. July 2009, 17:21:44 Subject: dosnt seem alot of money really when you consider the Western world is bleeding the earth dry http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8143566.stm 6. July 2009, 11:41:20 Subject: Re: Well any of our so called "shady" actions have nothing to do with our economics directly.. Bernice: yep we pronounce it sarkee to  19. June 2009, 19:37:54 Subject: Re:Police investigation (V): http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8110022.stm
lets hope this isnt brushed under the carpet 18. June 2009, 12:56:01 Subject: Re: (V): they playing straight into the BNP hands cant they see that 18. June 2009, 11:03:07 Subject: Re: (V): yet another WHITEWASH i just add words fail me cause if i put what i really feel i be banned from here for good  9. June 2009, 19:37:50 Subject: Re: a really bad sign IMO in English politics Modified by Snoopy (9. June 2009, 19:38:19) (V): at least we have freedom of speech and the right to demonstrate http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8091605.stm 8. June 2009, 19:41:51 Subject: a really bad sign IMO in English politics http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8088381.stm Labour being so unpopular gave them the seats if these results are repeated in a General Election were in for some very uneasy times  4. June 2009, 23:07:57 Subject: another Minister resigns 3. June 2009, 19:39:20 Subject: sure looks has if Brown is on his way out!!!! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8080777.stm
i dont think he last another month esp if local election results tomorrow night go against him  22. May 2009, 15:42:25 Subject: all parents of children BE AWARE of the shocking story just comming to light on what most parents think is a safe site for children to browse YOU TUBE http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/news.phtml/24272/youtube-porn-attack-videos-uploaded.phtml 22. May 2009, 15:27:44 Subject: some justice at least a very high profile baby abuse case in the UK has finally ended with the sentencing of the 3 evil monsters http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8055340.stm the sentences are not has heavy has what ppl would of liked but considering what has now come to light we should be somewhat grateful that they were not even lighter http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8062099.stm and it sends a warning to all the bloggers esp on facebook that all the hate groups set up at the time did more harm than good 15. May 2009, 13:11:18 Subject: another one bites the dust 15. May 2009, 10:34:38 Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign Modified by Snoopy (15. May 2009, 13:06:56) (V): i cant believe how aggrogant Margaret Beckett came across on http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8051222.stm Gordon Brown needs to do something now he needs to get of the fence and stop wishing it all go away because it WONT!!! we now have a near bankrupt country we have a government that is a joke and the longer it goes on the more Joe Public suffers the public voted for Tony Blair to be PM not him and he needs to be ousted what is he afraid of theres only 2 choices he wins or loses 15. May 2009, 08:02:47 Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign Pedro Martínez:  14. May 2009, 13:42:11 Subject: the first of many ppl to resign 13. May 2009, 19:34:58 Subject: the rush for the cheque books starts 8. May 2009, 22:36:25 Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses (V): if i made claims like this in a job i be shown door very quickly but this goes to the very top of goverment the Prime Minister himself abusing the system so what confidence does the normal Joe public have in him now lastest news is http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178516/Police-called-investigate-leak-MPs-expenses-dossier.html it dosnt matter how it was leaked we have has tax payers the right to know so why waste even more tax payers money by calling in the police 8. May 2009, 22:15:10 Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses (V): it beggars belief what some of the claims have been http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5293320/MPs-expenses-A-Z.html on the day up in my area 3000 are to lose there jobs because Chorus lost a major contract and are moth balling one of there blast furnaces this news hasnt gone down well at all here  8. May 2009, 19:39:51 Subject: UK goverment expenses are a disgrace some of the things leaked are crazy horse manure tampons for a male mp broken toilet seat http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm 5. May 2009, 11:02:08 Subject: Re: Modified by Snoopy (5. May 2009, 11:04:03) Pedro Martínez: yes your right i was side tracked there sorry  5. May 2009, 10:58:33 Subject: Re:come on..most don't have fathers in the house and the mothers have children by different men (V): oh very funny you know exactly what i meant get out from behind your pc for once and go see for yourself 5. May 2009, 10:28:10 Subject: Re:come on..most don't have fathers in the house and the mothers have children by different men Bernice: the trouble with Londoners they still dont beleive theres life past Watford gap they have everything handed to them on a plate so to speak Jules should try visiting some of the areas i mentioned and actually SEE for himself not go by goverment stats which we all know are fixed to look good 5. May 2009, 10:22:35 Subject: Re:come on..most don't have fathers in the house and the mothers have children by different men (V): i dont expect anything im just saying that you cant know what goes on in the rest of the country 5. May 2009, 10:08:39 Subject: Re:come on..most don't have fathers in the house and the mothers have children by different men (V): try telling the thousands of ppl who have lost there homes in last few months try telling the pensioners who have to decide whether to keep warm or eat that day try telling the thousands of schoolchildren who are still bullied try telling the thousands who live in fear of violent crime try telling the thousands of ppl who have lost there jobs in last few months that we live in the best country in the world they will break down every piece of your argument into tiny morsels 5. May 2009, 09:21:09 Subject: Re:come on..most don't have fathers in the house and the mothers have children by different men (V): but the point im making is its not has rosy has what your making out either theres always good and bad in any way of life but the way you come across is the UK dosnt have ANY problems AT ALL  4. May 2009, 23:48:12 Subject: Re:come on..most don't have fathers in the house and the mothers have children by different men Modified by Snoopy (4. May 2009, 23:50:40) (V): how do you know inner city ppl dont live in fear you cant possible know that for a fact there are many many areas of this country that drugs guns and knives are part of everyday life there are many many places were its still very unsafe to go out after dark you know exactly what is going on in your own neighbour hood but you havnt a clue what is going on in mine or in the next town to me or the next one after that do you?4. May 2009, 23:24:58 Subject: Re:come on..most don't have fathers in the house and the mothers have children by different men Modified by Snoopy (4. May 2009, 23:34:15) Bernice: V forgot to mention the amount of young ppl who have been stabbed in the last few years and we have a gang culture here to in the big city's and there are many weapons on the streets that shouldnt be there esp concerning drugs im proud to be British to but im sad to say that in the inner city's ppl live in fear of these yobs and keep quiet for fear of being there next victim one of the shameful things about being British is we have one of the highest teenage pregancy rates in Europe http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=7&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2F1%2Fhi%2Fhealth%2F7911684.stm&ei=El__SZbuEc2OjAegp-GsAw&usg=AFQjCNEr2xn3RXpBqhaXmhjc9dcD-dLI2g&sig2=Vi_95JQuJDxcyQV9VPkvLg 29. April 2009, 16:01:20 Subject: Re:Any word on the police, that brutally attacked a man walking home from work to watch the football match with his hands in his pockets and his back to them, yet? Modified by Snoopy (29. April 2009, 16:02:04) Czuch: nothing in last few days these enquiry's take along time here unless ive missed something and if i have im sure V will fill us in next time he on 28. April 2009, 23:18:02 Subject: well of all the stupid things that the people in charge of things can do this has got to be the worst stunt ever what on earth were they thinking of http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/8022881.stm 23. April 2009, 19:59:41 Subject: Re: (V): yes very temporary has the lastest news is that 27th Febuary 2032 will be the date that we actually get back to before all this mess started thats another 23 years of being taxed to the hilt or am i missing something 23. April 2009, 13:23:08 Subject: Re: Czuch: were broke yet we keep borrowing with the goverment claiming they will buy our way out of the mess theyve gotten into http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/96627 the top earners will once again be moving overseas so has not to pay i dont know much about the ins and outs but has a normal person in the UK i know how much im hurting has week after week my normal shopping bag of food increases by over £1 a week my savings get hardly anything in interest the sooner we have a general election the better 20. April 2009, 00:39:03 Subject: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED Modified by Snoopy (20. April 2009, 00:39:32) Bernice: and there is a report somewhere which i look out tomorrow that an ITV camera crew tried to give him first aid but where moved on by police anyway got to get some sleep lots to do tomorrow 19. April 2009, 23:20:41 Subject: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED Artful Dodger: i actually think the whole police operation from the very top down was really badly organised there is more and more protesters comming forward each day with claims of over reaction from the police and if i remember correctly that guy went to go his normal way home and found it blocked by police so had to go a different way which led to his death  19. April 2009, 23:07:51 Subject: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED (V): yes i read that couple of days ago 19. April 2009, 23:06:32 Subject: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED Artful Dodger: ive never disagreed that the officer was at fault what he did was so wrong i just think people should wait until ALL the facts come out before passing judgement i mean who are we to be judge jury and executioner 19. April 2009, 22:52:21 Subject: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED (V): im like you i dont do simple yes or no answers 19. April 2009, 22:50:58 Subject: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED (V): your jumping to a lot of assumptions ove this and repeating myself for the 5th time i will wait until all the evidence comes to light before passing judgement and ive never said the policeman was in the right your twisting my words on here has ive been SAYING all afternoon from a 30 sec video clip you have said this police officer must be guilty because of the video isnt that for a jury to decide upon not YOU 19. April 2009, 22:32:43 Subject: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED (V): i never said he wouldnt be arrested and charged what ive been saying all afternoon YOU are jumping the gun saying the officer is guilty even before it has gone to trial if it was so straight forward has your making out they have had the video for over a week they are questioning the officer they havnt charged him YET so IM saying there must be more to it still and isnt it better to wait and hear all the facts before JUDGING anyone 19. April 2009, 22:16:55 Subject: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED (V): this is taken from todays Times The Independent Police Complaints Commission, which is investigating his death, said: “Following the initial result of the second post-mortem a Metropolitan Police officer has been interviewed under caution for the offence of manslaughter.” The officer, a constable in the Territorial Support Group who has been suspended from duty, attended the interview voluntarily and has not been arrested. 19. April 2009, 22:09:45 Subject: Re: (V): and where did you see where that this policeman is going to be charged i havnt heard that yet they still questioning him according to the report ive just read on the BBC << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |