User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6   > >>
14. December 2009, 15:14:15
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): apart from the 1 min video what other evidence have you for such claims
NONE whats so ever

14. December 2009, 15:07:53
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:I saw no police violence in that video. The man was shoved and he fell.
(V): and has i said on the first day when the inquiry has finished i make my mind up
i dont like ppl who speculate on something they really know nothing about

14. December 2009, 09:42:42
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:I saw no police violence in that video. The man was shoved and he fell.
Modified by Snoopy (14. December 2009, 09:49:20)
Bernice: still all speculation

has ive said since DAY 1 until all the facts are known before making a judgement

Jules wasnt there on that day so how can he possible know all the facts
there are hundreds of questions that need answering and until they are
Jules can only speculate that said policeoffericer should be charged with manslaughter

14. December 2009, 08:18:31
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:I saw no police violence in that video. The man was shoved and he fell.
Artful Dodger: at last someone else sees what i see
2 sides to the story

until all the evidence is laid out before the public i dont see how anyone can say this police officer should be charged with anything
he was doing his job in a very heated situtation
there was alot of anger on both sides of the coin that day
and until we know what was said by both parties
how can we possible know who was in the wrong

13. December 2009, 12:09:56
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:Its legal if during a riot, the police command you to show your hands, and to move out of the way.... as far as i know, it is illegal to disobey any command from a police officer, and they always have a right to force you to comply.
(V): has the whole scene was very heated AND I SAY AGAIN WITHOUT ANY SOUND
WE DONT KNOW WHAT WAS SAID!!!!

in these trouble times they could well of thought he was a sudice bomber for all we know
so in that context they should take him out in whatever way possible

12. December 2009, 12:53:05
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): whatever
i dont have time to go back to each post that you posted
ive got a life to get on with and a farm that needs the crops harvesting

11. December 2009, 17:42:53
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): and has i said on many occasions and i say it again
you twist things round to suit yourself

11. December 2009, 17:32:12
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): because it shows where your contridicting yourself now

11. December 2009, 09:02:56
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): no it isnt
but you only have to go back and read all your posts in April on this subject to see
simple really

10. December 2009, 20:08:49
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
Czuch: whats the point in arguing with Jules
cause whatever one says he twists it round to suit himself has per normal

10. December 2009, 15:19:21
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): and here we are nearly 9 months down the line and
still nothing new to report
but i will say if it was has straight forward has you claimed on that day
surely the policeman invovled would of been charged by now
instead we have nothing so has i said in the start lets wait until the enquiry has finished

10. December 2009, 13:36:16
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
Artful Dodger: thats exactly what i was trying to tell V that day
wait and see we dont know all the facts
but if i remember correctly he kept putting me down saying the video evidence is fact enough

7. December 2009, 09:25:32
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): yep we wait and wait and still get it so wrong

this case will always spring to mind

Jean Charles de Menezes

24. November 2009, 19:01:38
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: Creationism, Intelligent Design, etc.
Tuesday: no you missed the point others where making

23. November 2009, 14:06:03
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: Creationism, Intelligent Design, etc.
Tuesday: did man create smallpox?

21. November 2009, 18:13:55
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: EU Directive No. 456179
Bernice: love it

1. November 2009, 18:17:55
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: Credit where credit is due
Modified by Snoopy (1. November 2009, 18:22:09)
(V): And after WWII the Empire became the Commonwealth. Gurkha's still join the British army and fight side by side with British born soldiers, and more recently won the right to remain in the UK after retirement thanks to a campaign by UK citizens which forced the government to give in despite the cost

it was Joanna Lumley that made that happen

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/may/07/gurkhas-joanna-lumley-phil-woolas

and cost shouldn't come into it
many Gurkha's have laid down there lives to fight for our country so the least we can do is let them live here if they so wish without thinking about money

27. October 2009, 23:05:52
Snoopy 
Subject: times are changing

26. October 2009, 21:31:22
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:the sooner the BBC and the government realise that ppl will not be ripped off any more the better
(V): whatever you say must be right
you twist things round to suit yourself has per normal

all im saying is in 2017 if the BBC has to show adverts to survive i be the happiest person in the UK
but you want to bring everything else into the conversation and twist it to make you look good
well i dont have time to argue with you so Good Night

26. October 2009, 21:16:15
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:the sooner the BBC and the government realise that ppl will not be ripped off any more the better
Modified by Snoopy (26. October 2009, 21:17:07)
(V): Right.. so while footballers are ripping off people and clubs thanks to 'Sky sports', Murdoch wants to charge for access to Murdoch group websites.. like news.

i couldnt care less what footballers get paid
why bring that up
what has it got to do with over paid actors such has Ross

and i OBJECT to my hard earned money going towards giving him a life of luxury

26. October 2009, 16:11:53
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:its stupid even ppl who dont have a television installed but have a computer still have to pay it
(V): i think you find your just one of a few these days

the sooner the BBC and the government realise that ppl will not be ripped off any more the better

i could only ever agree to a tv licence in any shape or form when they stop paying the outragous wages to these wanabe stars ie: Johnathon Ross and all the soap stars

cant wait for 2017 to come and have them kick it into touch once and for all

26. October 2009, 11:46:50
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Snoopy (26. October 2009, 11:50:51)
(V): Some may not like the BBC and it's license fee, but it's a neutral company by it's charter. The fee pays for countless free local radio stations as well as TV without advertising. Nothing Murdoch owns can be said to be the same.

its outdated in this day and age
the BBC should do what the other stations do and allow adverts to make there money

its stupid even ppl who dont have a television installed but have a computer still have to pay it

i did read somewhere but cant find the link now that the government have to wait until 2017 until the BBC charter is up for renewal before they can make any changes

25. October 2009, 21:15:06
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: we pay £142 50p a year for a tv licence which every household must have or get taken to court
this funds the BBC
its very unpopular these days cause simply its outdated

25. October 2009, 20:53:33
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Snoopy (25. October 2009, 20:55:30)
Artful Dodger: when it was first mentioned that he would appear i was gob smacked that a tv station
i have to pay a licence fee for was allowing him on

but after watching it and esp how the rest of the panel shot him down made him look small made my day

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/10/25/the-nasty-nick-show-why-we-needed-it-115875-21771418/

24. October 2009, 14:19:16
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): Afterwards he complained that he had been treated unfairly saying much of the show had been a "beat up Nick Griffin programme instead of Question Time".

i must of been watching a different program then

24. October 2009, 09:25:00
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): the guy is a real joke
enough said

14. October 2009, 14:57:02
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:how come you never or very rarely see these ppl without the latest designer gear pulling up to the signing on offices in there cars
Modified by Snoopy (14. October 2009, 15:13:35)
(V): just has the labour government did nothing to fix the problems she created
which brings everything nicely back to AD's post which was
Frankly, it sounds like both our governments are a bunch nitwits when it comes to financial matters.

okay had my say now back to what im really here for to play games


PS I don't know where you see this happening very rarely, and 2) how do you know they didn't buy this stuff before losing a job? 3) how do you know if they are single?
thats easy to answer known most of them since birth known there parents before them etc etc
dont have to be brain of Britain to know they just a bunch of layabouts who abuse the system year in year out

14. October 2009, 14:29:13
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:how come you never or very rarely see these ppl without the latest designer gear pulling up to the signing on offices in there cars
(V): here we go again blame it all on Maggie despite the fact that the labour government before her had the country on its knees

14. October 2009, 14:10:09
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:heres another stupid Labour idea
Modified by Snoopy (14. October 2009, 14:22:11)
(V): but thats was the whole idea of the dole system surely was to tie ppl over until they found another job
it was never meant to gave ppl luxury items like it does now

if the money is so low for single ppl how come you never or very rarely see these ppl without the latest designer gear pulling up to the signing on offices in there cars
all with there mobile phones

heres a case in point few years ago i had to go my local social security office to sort things out after my mother died
and a girl in there was bragging that she come in for a crisis loan and she said they couldnt refuse her has she had children despite the fact that on every finger where gold rings and she actually reported the guy behind the desk
when he quite natually pointed out why didnt she sell some of her gold if she was that hard up

its not actually the system i object to
its the abuse of the system thats carried out on such a massive scale
there will always be ppl in genuine need

14. October 2009, 12:34:13
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:heres another stupid Labour idea
(V): yeah ive heard about these so called schemes
they attend for allotted time
fill in a few forms do a CV knowning full well that at the end of the day they not going to find work and so its back to the life of Riley on the dole

if there money was cut everytime they attended one of these so called schemes they just might get the message
GET OF YOUR LAZY BUTT AND FIND WORK

14. October 2009, 12:14:42
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:heres another stupid Labour idea
Modified by Snoopy (14. October 2009, 12:25:02)
(V): thats my point its good to give to those ppl who are in the low paid jobs
ive nothing against that one lil bit
but im talking about giving to those who live there whole working lives on the dole

and how are ppl on these benifits able to afford internet access anyway ?

14. October 2009, 12:04:36
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:heres another stupid Labour idea
(V) your missing my point again

they would be able to buy there children computers and whatever else if they went out and found work

and dont tell me there isnt the jobs available cause there is if they look hard enough
they prefer to drink there beers take there drugs and get everything handed to them on a plate
and why should any decent hard working person have to pay for someone else child to have the same has theyve had to work hard for

14. October 2009, 11:58:39
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:why must you always lay the blame on Maggie?
(V): well Maggie will always be a hero in my eyes

and i loved hearing the mother of one of the many killed in the Iraq war ask whether Tony Blair is to be charged with war crimes

Tony Blair was nothing more than George Bush puppet

14. October 2009, 11:04:43
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:heres another stupid Labour idea
Modified by Snoopy (14. October 2009, 11:24:44)
Bernice: to let every child in the country internet access by giving parents vouchers to buy computers

ive never heard anything more stupid its so open to abuse its a joke
they just get the vouchers buy the computer and sell it the same day

not to mention the fact that if they got off there lazy asses and when and got a job
they be able to buy there children these things

14. October 2009, 10:32:48
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:why must you always lay the blame on Maggie?
Modified by Snoopy (14. October 2009, 10:55:40)
(V): no no no
the mess isnt caused by Maggie

she didnt decide to spend us out of a recession
she didnt decide to send us into 2 wars that had nothing to do with us
she was the one who infact cleaned up the mess after THE LAST LABOUR GOVERNMENT

14. October 2009, 02:56:40
Snoopy 
Subject: Broken Britain
Modified by Snoopy (14. October 2009, 03:00:44)
i love to see one of the government ministers challenged to take up a job where the take home pay is coppers more than what benifits pay out

i love to see one of them come to live on any of the hundreds of estates that are no go areas after dark because of fear of being murdered cause you didnt give the hooded gangs a ciggie when they demanded it

i love to see a top goverment minister have to walk thou the crack and heroin addicts just to get home

but it will never happen they live in there own lil worlds and dream there own lil dreams

14. October 2009, 00:23:46
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:***The Times of London and BBC News contributed to this report***.
Modified by Snoopy (14. October 2009, 00:28:26)
(V): in my mind the country is in a right mess brought on by nearly 10 years of a labour government

the country is in serious debt which every man woman and child will be paying for
for the next 30 years

we were taken into 2 wars that the vast majority of the UK ppl didnt want and we dont even equip our troops properly
for the last few years weve been led by a joker who wasnt even elected
we have elected members of the house of commons ripping us off left right and centre
we are on our knees and then the government comes up with this stupid idea to sell off things

but the sad thing is the conservatives will not do any better

13. October 2009, 09:38:43
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:***The Times of London and BBC News contributed to this report***.
(V): so much for our idiot prime minister trying to buy us out of recession

22. September 2009, 19:38:02
Snoopy 
Subject: once again
its one law for the already haves and another law for the have nots
and this woman created the law she broke

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8268101.stm

9. September 2009, 15:47:41
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: Well it seems the goal to me.... make everyone the same/ equal.... all the same care and education etc, and pay for it from taxing the wealthy, and then the wealthy are not so and the poor are not so.
(V): but sadly the ones who do the donkey work IE: the nurses get a pittance

27. August 2009, 20:45:48
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): mmmm maybe its not a national disgrace in your eyes but in mine it is

27. August 2009, 19:32:18
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8223710.stm


im guessing this where you took your info from
its a national disgrace

26. August 2009, 18:43:18
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: UK health care...
Czuch: its happening more and more
we have an acute shortage of midwives all over the country
its yet another disgraceful aspect to our health service

21. August 2009, 18:09:15
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:We are far from perfect!!!!
Modified by Snoopy (21. August 2009, 18:23:23)
Bernice: makes me wonder sometimes to..lol

but Jules lives in the rich South
while us poor Northerns are the poor relations

my next door neighbour husband died a couple of months ago on route to hospital in an ambulance
the ambulance driver decided en route that he was fed up of doing over time so he went by ambulance depot and clocked off still with patient on board
so there was a delay of over 7 mins whilst the shift change took place and reaching the hospital hence the patient on board died
he may of course have died anyway we will never know for sure but my point is from the top notch doctors to the cleaners of the hospitals
are overworked poorly paid and thousands leave every year to work in the private sector


http://ts18.gazettelive.co.uk/2009/06/medics-speak-out-over-colleagues-detour.html

28. July 2009, 07:01:38
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: i agree with you on this being from the UK
there are many many things wrong with the health service here
first off the nurses are very underpaid
we still have very long waiting lists
hospitals are not clean
they should bring back the Matron IMO
doctors are strenched to the limit

when i was in hospital last year i went to the bathroom and the toilet seat was filthy
i asked the cleaner who was dishing out the mid morning cuppa to sort it out only to told that it wasnt her job on that day
and it would have to wait until the night cleaners came on shift
another 8 hours away

23. July 2009, 19:58:59
Snoopy 
Subject: great story on how to complain to big companies

22. July 2009, 09:34:05
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): it may be not acceptable but it still goes on

children can be very cruel to each other esp now we live in the must be better than the Jones age

18. July 2009, 19:23:42
Snoopy 
Subject: lets remember this great man

15. July 2009, 11:29:26
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): i remember being in a room on pogo.com on Christmas day and being told off by someone for wishing everyone in the room a Happy Christmas
it wasn't ethical to do that anymore i was told

15. July 2009, 11:03:59
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
(V): the world has gone crazy

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top