User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator:  Walter Montego 
 Chess

Chess Discussion

For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17   > >>
15. November 2006, 19:05:40
BlitzMe 
Scratch the 5-2, one of this timed losses was going to be his win. So closer to a 5-3 score.

15. November 2006, 18:54:47
BlitzMe 
I completed my blitz games with Grim Reaper. The final score says Kurnik is 7-2-0 in my favor. Though, 1 or 2 of his losses by running out of time were draws. So it probably around 5-2 with some draws.

You can view all the games here: http://www.kurnik.org/intl/en/stat.phtml?gid=ch&uid=bk_grimreaper&sk=2

14. November 2006, 03:08:48
BlitzMe 
I won the match by forfeit. Grim Reaper is too scared.

9. November 2006, 10:53:01
BlitzMe 
I challenge Grim Reaper to a Blitz(3 Minutes timer for whole game) Chess Match of 12 games at Kurnik.org.

8. November 2006, 18:46:05
Andre Faria 
Subject: Re: Grim Reaper back in action
panzerschiff: great tournament. Im seeing the italian is going to end 4th... Not surprising, as his game with Ed was already lost many moves before... Maybe he was expecting ED to lose by time out...

4. November 2006, 20:40:13
panzerschiff 
Subject: Grim Reaper back in action
Modified by panzerschiff (5. November 2006, 11:55:29)
The Grim Reaper, a.k.a Ed Trice, has scored an impression 5.5 out of 6.0 in the Mir Malik Sultan Khan Memorial tournament here on BrainKing. Congratulations Ed and considering you opponents were all over 2300 rated a nice performance in that final. Nice to see you back in competition on this site!

Now that you are back in action maybe I can talk you into a game or two of Janus Chess.....

Tournament reference added ... WQ

4. November 2006, 17:26:11
ColonelCrockett 
Subject: My Chess Blog

15. October 2006, 18:09:27
Undertaker. 

14. October 2006, 14:01:38
goodbyebking 
This is all true. It is too bad that we have cast a bright light upon this whole, silly, pock-marked, touristed conversation. Chess is a great game between two players... over coffee, over wine...
Over politics, over ego, it remains a puffy, weak male response to that echo, that reverberation which insinuates that the game implies some wisdom. The game is just a game. Please, everyone, try to find a way to make some friends. It is time to open some windows and breathe....

14. October 2006, 13:18:44
Beren the 32nd 
Subject: Re: the players are not treated equally
gambler104: Yes, Kramnik won the match twice in the end. 3 wins to 2 at classical chess, then 2.5 to 1.5 at rapid chess. The great news for the chess world now is that no-one can really argue about who is the champion anymore.
Now that Topalov has lost I find it easier to forgive him for his team's behaviour. It is a shame for him too. He played the more attacking chess (IMO) and if he had just kept his nerve at the vital moments he could have been ahead in the match after the first 2 games. He blundered later on too didn't he? I think he played so much better in San Luis.

13. October 2006, 23:28:44
northstar 
Subject: Re: the players are not treated equally
gambler104: Number 435152 is well known at IYT for posting nonsense.Just because he likes Topalov,he thinks Kramnik is not as good.

13. October 2006, 21:46:55
gambler104 
Subject: Re: the players are not treated equally
435152: I don't see how you can claim that the better player did not win. Kramnik won despite the fact that he forfeited a game. I think he deserved to win.

13. October 2006, 19:02:23
cheating up up 
Subject: Re: the players are not treated equally
Kiry:
your man won the wwc title.
i am disappointed that a better player did not win.
i should quit in this chess discussion board.

13. October 2006, 14:20:54
WhisperzQ 
Subject: Re:
swordswisher: Not sure if this has gone to air yet but the intended games (if they eventuate) would be of a 10x8 chess variant not of "standard" chess. The one trying to organise this tournament has been around this site over the years but less so of late. If you hear more of this torunament please post it in the 10x8 forum.

WQ :)

13. October 2006, 09:30:38
Kiry 
Subject: Re: the players are not treated equally
435152:
www.VESELINTOPALOV.net simply supports the player it is devided to and I think sponsored by.

12. October 2006, 22:26:02
cheating up up 
Subject: the players are not treated equally
according to www.veselintopalov.net Topalov was not treated equally
The day before game 12
.....last night the six guards of Veselin Topalov's villa have been found sleeping while being on duty. The guards have been caught by a patrol car. The news was reported by Zhivko Ginchev for the Bulgarian website topsport.bg. At the same time the villa of Kramnik is guarded by three times more professional guards from the Russian army.
other news
Presidential airplane not allowed by Russian authorities:
On Wednesday Bulargian president Georgi Parvanov chartered a flight for Veselin Topalov. The plane was to take off for Bulgaria immediately after the championship finished, reported focus-sport.net. Authorities, however, did not allow the plane to enter Russian territory. No reason was given.
" This is a scandal," Mr. Silvio Danailov said,"nobody explained why the plane was not allowed to land in Russia." At the same time, a plane will come for Vladimir Kramnik and is granted full access to the airport in Elista.

12. October 2006, 21:24:47
cheating up up 
Subject: Re: Fischer vs Karpov.
swordswisher:
it is hard to believe that Fischer will play Karpov, both are over the peak chess player, Fischer didnot play him when he was at his peak, and forfeited the match to Karpov, after more than 30 years later they are willing to sit down face each other on the chess board? what is prize fund for this match? who is the sponsor?

12. October 2006, 17:18:36
swordswisher 

12. October 2006, 17:15:26
Kiry 
Subject: Re: Kasparov on WCC Elista 2006
435152:
Fisher can say many different things. Not all of them is truth.
The 12 game is draw. So on board 3:2 Kramnik wins.
But due to unfair decisions of the first appeals committee the score is equal.
If doping test will show nothing, i think that Kramnik has all reasons to say:
"I will not recognize Mr Topalov as World Champion under these conditions" as he promissed to do after game 11.

12. October 2006, 16:37:25
cheating up up 
Subject: Re: Kasparov on WCC Elista 2006
Kiry:
Fischer also once said that Kasparov is a liar.
lets talk about the WCC match, now the last (12) game is under way, i look into the position Black is in a better position to win.
it is funny that all 12 games are played with d4, and most of the time, Kramnik was playing defensive, i will say it is the pawn pushing game, Topalov pushed pawns forward and Kramnik just kept his pawns at the last 3 ranks on the board.

12. October 2006, 09:22:03
Kiry 
Subject: Re: Kasparov on WCC Elista 2006
435152:
Fisher has his own opinion:
"all the Russain chess players are not trustfull"
I want to say that it's only Fisher's opinion,
not truth in the last instance.
And Kasparov did not agree with it, as I think he does not approve 911.

12. October 2006, 03:27:50
cheating up up 
Subject: WCC Elista 2006-doping test
according to www.veselintopalov.net
The day before game 11(updated).Oct 9,06:58PM
......At the same time not much informatio has been released about Kramnik's rest day. However, strange news was reported by Zhivko Ginchev. He said that Kramnik refused to make a doping test after game 9. The test has been requested by the chief of the medical commission Iana Belin, as reported by topsport.bg. "Everything here is very strange, but what can we do about it," commented Silvio Danailov for the Bulgarian newspaper Novinar. From the Bulgarian delegation also find it strange that such a test comes after the two consecutive victories of Topalov.

also from the Press conference game 11- Oct10,05:25PM
...............
................
- Veselin, are you disappointed by today's result? This was your last White...
- The result is okay. Of course, I always want to win, but the result is appropriate. I did not have sufficient advantage to talk about winning seriously.

-Now you have to play your last game as Black...
-There is a rest day, and I will be preparing for the game 12. Right now I am happy to have passed the doping test easily! I'll start thinking about the final game tomorrow...
----------------------------------------
Kramnik also passed his doping test? i do not know

11. October 2006, 19:04:22
cheating up up 
Subject: WCC Elista 2006
I have not seen any open letter supporting FIDE Champion Topalov published on ChessBase.Com until today, there are two open letters on Topalov side , one from the " famous Bulgarian grandmasters" the other one is from the President of Bulgaria

first read what the ChessBase.com try to defend that their position was neutral.
from Chessbase.com:
"...We did not leave a single letter written by grandmaster or title chess player in support of Topalov unpublished. Below, incidentally, is the first we found-and it took some trouble locating it"

from "famous Bulgarian grandmasters" open letter called "Hand off from the World Champion!"
.....the high point of this dirty aggression was reached with the open letter of Russian grandmasters Peter Svidler and Evgeny Bareev. What a moral position do they represent, since they are demonstrably part of the Challenger's staff? of what do you, dear sirs, accuse Topalov ? That he fights and does it openly and honestly?
from the President of Bulgaria:
"... It is no secret the representatives of the match organizing nation often have certain advantages, I firmly stand the idea that political games must not influence situation on the board...."

11. October 2006, 17:27:47
cheating up up 
Subject: Re: Kasparov on WCC Elista 2006
Kiry:
Fischer has his own opinion about the 911, think it this way, if all women are beautiful there will be no beautiful woman.

11. October 2006, 09:53:35
Kiry 
I think that the rules of all serious tournaments should be restricted.
1. Drag test for all players.
2. Players should be isolated from other people during the game.
It is strange that under the screen that isolates players from spectators Topalov does not shows his famouse tactic abilities.

11. October 2006, 09:38:03
Kiry 
Subject: Re: Kasparov on WCC Elista 2006
435152:
I agree with Kasparov's opinion.
For example Fisher approved Trade Centre attacks on september 11. I think only strange man can do that.

10. October 2006, 15:25:45
cheating up up 
Subject: Kasparov on WCC Elista 2006
Kasparov was interviewed in the Wall Street Journal:
" Mr. Fischer may have been difficult and unstable, but he was a sportman whose complaints were based on principle and a sincere desire to improve the standards of the chess world. Tournament conditions and prize funds improved immeasurably thanks to his efforts."
Kasparov does not understand Fischer who always accuses the Russian chess players cheating.

10. October 2006, 15:05:27
cheating up up 
Subject: one thing Fischer will do
Fischer will request an urine test. he never trust the Russian chess players.

10. October 2006, 15:02:05
cheating up up 
Subject: drug test
i still believe an urine test from both players is the right thing to do.
Kramnik is a suspect to take drug, people are talking about just computer assistant cheating.

10. October 2006, 14:56:11
cheating up up 
Subject: if the wcc match tied after game 12
Kramnik won't continue the tie-break match then FIDE has a decision to make, who is the champion?

10. October 2006, 09:24:36
Kiry 
From later games we know that Topalov is a very strong tactic player. But in the match with Kramnik he does not see mate in two in second, makes loosing move in tenth.
What is the cause of this mistakes?

10. October 2006, 09:07:10
Kiry 
Subject: Re: if Fischer was in Topalov's position
435152:
I think that Fisher made a mistake.
Korchnoy have said the same things
20 years ago, and now he is sending
letter to support Kramnik.

10. October 2006, 08:59:28
Kiry 
Subject: Re: if Fischer was in Topalov's position
435152:
I think that people and sportsmans from
other countries would behave themselfs
the same way in the same position.

10. October 2006, 08:56:14
Kiry 
Subject: Re:
WhisperzQ:
Ok, let's try without "personal attacks".
But I don't think that moderated letters
(except one, sorry) contain them...

9. October 2006, 23:25:22
WhisperzQ 
I have deleted a few posts are they are considered personal attacks and do not add substance to the debate. They have not been copied to their owners. If this goes the same way again ability to post will be retricted (and for some withdrawn).

This is an interesting debate, please keep it there.

WhisperzQ

9. October 2006, 17:40:31
cheating up up 
Subject: rule should be changed to avoid cheating
the first time i learnt about chess is the famous Fischer-Spassky match in 1972, at that time, the player could seal his move inside an envelop to adjourn the game, and left the work for his second to analyze the position of the unfinished game, the player just continue to play the moves next day that his second provided for him. i also notice that the player could walk away from the playing board anytime he wanted.
as a chinese chess player, i was very surprised that this kind of action would be allowed in chess match, it is 100% prohibited in chinese chess match.
now the " sealing move inside an envelop after 40 moves" is no more a rule.

9. October 2006, 15:39:37
cheating up up 
Subject: Re: if Fischer was in Topalov's position
Kiry:
accoding to Fischer, all the Russain chess players are not trustful, if you read Fischer's book, you know about it.

9. October 2006, 14:29:05
cheating up up 
Subject: another two guys
Bareev and Svidler, 2 friends, colleagues and former seconds of Kramnik, they sent open letter to suport
the Russian.

9. October 2006, 14:21:49
cheating up up 
Subject: if Fischer was in Topalov's position
two Russian grandmasters and former chess world champions, Boris Spassky (now he is a French citizen) and Kasparov (now he is a politician also the classical world champion creator) expressed their opinions in public on the Topalov-Kramnik match, they claimed that Fischer is not Topalov, Fischer's complaint was to the organizor about playing condition but not to his opponent, the question is: will Fischer complain if he was in Topalov position?
the answer is Fischer will do the same thing, he will protest Kramnik's strange behaviour to visit toilet frequently for suspecting the Russian is cheating, please remember that Fischer always accused the Russian cheating.
now Karpov, another ex-world champion,(Fischer forfeited the whole match to him) and Krochloi(3 times challenge to Karpov's world title) they also sending letters to Chessbase.com to support Kramnik, ha, these two are also Russian or Russian original.

9. October 2006, 06:52:44
goodbyebking 
Subject: Re:
pawnme: Here here! Good point.

9. October 2006, 06:21:03
Clandestine 1 
Maybe it's a smart strategy; everyone's concentrating on why Kramnik is on the toilet instead of analyzing the game.

7. October 2006, 21:57:01
ouspensky 
Subject: Crib sheets
Maybe he had crib sheets from computer analysis that he was referring to.

7. October 2006, 20:38:31
cheating up up 
Subject: Re: re: world chess championship
Topalov won the game 9 with white, now Topalov is leading 5:4
what Kramnik was doing? he was playing for a draw, his play is very passive that is his style.
it looks like Kramnik is finished at this stage.
Topalov is the better player should win the match.
should Kramnik sue the FIDE if he lost by two games?

7. October 2006, 16:17:13
cheating up up 
Subject: Kramnik and toilet
kramnik visited the toilet 25 times in one game and 18 times in another, in the first 2 games, in 1 and half hour, 11 or 12 times.
the explanation of Kramnik's team is that Kramnik uses the toilet space for walking. According to the opinion of the Appeals Committee, this explanation is unsatisfactory, as Kramnik was staying each time 1 or 2 minutes in the toilet.

6. October 2006, 14:44:17
cheating up up 
Subject: re: world chess championship
Topalov won the game 8 with black, now the score is 4:4
i heard about Topalov showed his confidence and well preparation for the game by moving very very fast.
this just kept his opponent sitting on his chair and Kramnik got no time to visit his loved toilet as frequently as he wanted.
very good idea indeed by Topalov's team!

6. October 2006, 14:37:54
Kiry 
Subject: Re: rating
435152:
1. Topalov(with his team) stronger than Kramnik(with his team). The team is the result of the player's work and so on... Once more:
Topalov little bit stronger than Kramnik.
2. Happened so that in this match Kramnik was leader.
3. Topalov uses unfair methods.
4. I don't like it.

6. October 2006, 14:27:28
Kiry 
Subject: Re:
435152:
1,2. I would say that chances of Topalov are better.
3. As for me, I prefer classical match under
FIDE control.
4. I prefer fair strong play, and don't like unfair very strong play.

6. October 2006, 14:24:49
cheating up up 
Subject: Re: rating
Kiry:
my choice: Topalov 2813>2743
how you get your rating? is your rating unfair?

6. October 2006, 13:55:11
cheating up up 
Subject: Re:
Kiry:
1. if Topalov lost this match he would be the challenger the next time.
2. if Kramnik lost he will never be the challenger again because of his playing style.
3. the next world chese championship should be played as classical or under FIDE world champion system?

6. October 2006, 13:32:40
Kiry 
One point of view.
1. Topalov is playing better than Kramnik.
a. Begin of the game Topalov > Kramnik
b. Middle of the game Topalov >= Kramnik
c. End of the game Topalov <= Kramnik
2. Does Kramnik use drugs or cheating nobody knows.
3. Does Topalov use drugs or cheating nobody knows.
4. Topalov(his team) uses unfair methods.

Results:
1 Kramnik - very strong player with rating 2743.
2 Topalov - very strong unfair player with rating 2813.
Make Your choice.

<< <   8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top