User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Walter Montego 
 Chess variants (10x8)

Sam has closed his piano and gone to bed ... now we can talk about the real stuff of life ... love, liberty and games such as
Janus, Capablanca Random, Embassy Chess & the odd mention of other 10x8 variants is welcome too


For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or for particular games: Janus; Capablanca Random; or Embassy)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- disussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position
... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted while that particular game is in progress)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

26. March 2006, 13:13:01
Chicago Bulls 
Modified by Chicago Bulls (26. March 2006, 13:13:47)
They were very interesting and i wanted to attack to Smirf's King.....

26. March 2006, 14:14:33
SMIRF Engine 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: That must have been a very tired wish ... facing SMIRF's huge advantage.

26. March 2006, 18:24:07
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
SMIRF Engine:
Huge advantage????? In what game are you refering to? Black one or white one?
In white game i would win clearly. In black game i had the small advantage although the game was definitely complicated....!
If you say huge advantage due to Smirf's evalutions i have proven before that Smirf's evaluations and generally computer's evaluations in that kind of games i create in 10x8 Chess variations, are worthless.
Remember that in our first black game Smirf believed it had even a +5.000 or more points advantage, but i knew clearly that i will win like i did....

26. March 2006, 18:27:23
SMIRF Engine 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: If you really would be able to clearly win as you claim, you should do it in a fair way. Else nobody will understand your strange behaviour.

26. March 2006, 18:30:11
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
SMIRF Engine: If you really would be able to clearly win as you claim, you should do it in a fair way. Else nobody will understand your strange behaviour.
1st: I don't understand the "fair way". Why i wasn't fair?
2nd: Also it was not my fault that we would not know the result of these games as it was not me that resigned.....
3nd: Why my behaviour is strange....?

26. March 2006, 18:32:25
SMIRF Engine 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: Well, I am almost tired to repeat myself. You should actually know, what turns me down.

26. March 2006, 18:24:53
Fwiffo 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Fwiffo (26. March 2006, 18:25:14)
Hey, the Gothic Chess board is getting interesting again!

26. March 2006, 18:27:24
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Fwiffo: Yeah, but don't hope for a fight to start between Reinhard and me! I'm a huge fan of Smirf and i fully support Reinhard in what he does(at computer game programming) and there is not even a tiny chance to start fighting with him.....
I just disagree with him sometimes....

26. March 2006, 18:50:16
WhiteTower 
Subject: Re:
Fwiffo: There is no such board in BrainKing. The current regime doesn't like retrograding :)

26. March 2006, 18:58:58
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re:
WhiteTower: That's what I was thinking too.

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top