User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

31. May 2003, 20:44:19
pipilo 
Subject: Re: Reversi
Why is it so important to start with the diagonal opening?

19. May 2003, 06:51:31
pipilo 
Subject: Re: new move options
Apparently, there are two drop-down menus for members. One of them allows you to pick which game you'll go to next.

18. May 2003, 19:48:53
pipilo 
Subject: Re: new move options
Well, who woulda thunk it? I had no idea.

Something like that probably won't mean much to nonmembers until they try it. Maybe nonmembers should get one day of member privileges per month, just to try it out and see what the differences are. That might create enough incentive for more to join.

18. May 2003, 18:31:22
pipilo 
Subject: new move options
Fencer: The new pull-down box for "move and go to" options is terrific. What a great idea. I love being able to pick which game I want to view next, while still having all those other options. Thanks!

14. May 2003, 20:53:24
pipilo 
Subject: Re: A few thoughts
Removing unused names upon request wouldn't reduce bandwidth at all, but would help solve the other, unrelated problem of people wanting to use names that may be already taken by inactive pawns.

14. May 2003, 18:38:47
pipilo 
Subject: Re: A few thoughts
Good point. Thanks.

Maybe unused names could be removed upon request? Deleting all names that haven't been used for a few months might be a good idea too, but it would be nice to send them a courtesy email first.

14. May 2003, 17:18:07
pipilo 
Subject: Re: A few thoughts
I don't think deleting inactive pawn accounts would help much at all. It's bandwidth (information transfer capacity) that's the problem, not a few kilobytes of information stored on Fencer's server. If an inactive player is inactive, that's not affecting the site's daily traffic at all.

Also, if we send email reminders in an attempt to bring inactive pawns back, then we're just adding to the traffic, not alleviating it.

The solution needs to generate money for more powerful servers and more bandwidth, without deleting accounts or limiting moves. I'd rather have emails go out to the most active pawns, rather than to the least active. With appropriate incentives, they (at least some of them) might be encouraged to join the site.

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top