 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
30. September 2017, 00:35:27 Subject: Re: Spring-bocking or fall-blocking, that is the question. playBunny: Yes indeed. 17. September 2017, 23:59:47 Subject: Re: who got your membership ? Mélusine: Can anyone borrow it? 17. September 2017, 22:15:25 Subject: Re: Spring-bocking or fall-blocking, that is the question. Modified by crosseyed_uk (18. September 2017, 14:28:20) playBunny: Re: Good question! It came out of the blue, a complete surprise. How lovely for you. I think you have a secret admirer? Hugs know what I mean? 16. September 2017, 00:44:44 Subject: Re: Bocking or not blocking that is the question. Modified by crosseyed_uk (16. September 2017, 00:51:02) playBunny: Okay. We have something in common too lol. 15. September 2017, 19:39:43 Subject: Re: Bocking or not blocking that is the question. Modified by crosseyed_uk (16. September 2017, 00:42:10) playBunny: That was very clever of you to create that system for your own use. You could sell that to people who seriously want to block people. 15. September 2017, 18:03:36 Subject: Re: Bocking or not blocking that is the question. playBunny: That is interesting that you can use that system in DailyGammon. To be honest if I block someone who I really dislike I would not unblock them just to be curious. 15. May 2016, 21:55:54 Subject: Re: Bocking or not blocking that is the question. Mélusine: Well put Melusine. Besides I am sure they would be tempted to take the person they have on block, off block to read the post that may or not be about them.  8. May 2016, 16:25:37 Subject: Re: blocked users and discussion boards Modified by crosseyed_uk (8. May 2016, 16:32:46) ThunderGr: He is only attention seeking and trying to get the sympathy vote, because like a spoilt child that cannot get their own way is playing up. It obvious that he has reduced his games and has time on his hands so to speak, so has now decided to post on the discussion boards to get noticed. Be it for the right reasons or wrong reasons. If I was so discontented with a game site I would leave. 8. May 2016, 14:40:14 Subject: Re: blocked users and discussion boards Brian1971: LMAO. 8. May 2016, 14:36:18 Subject: Re: blocked users and discussion boards Brian1971: So you don't have me on block then? 8. May 2016, 14:30:43 Subject: Re: blocked users and discussion boards Brian1971: But do they know you have them on block?  8. May 2016, 13:07:08 Subject: Re: blocked users and discussion boards Justaminute As I have already stated it pointless to make a suggestion if you already know that nothing will be done about it. 8. May 2016, 11:49:43 Subject: Re: blocked users and discussion boards ThunderGr:  8. May 2016, 11:42:56 Subject: Re: blocked users and discussion boards Brian1971: It is beyond me that you have the nerve to make a suggestion about this site when you claim Fencer does nothing in this site. So why bother making any suggestion? 21. May 2014, 11:33:35 Subject: Re: Bug Tracker Gabriel Almeida: Respect is furthest from my mind. 20. May 2014, 20:05:20 Subject: Re: Bug Tracker Aganju: I would.  20. May 2014, 19:53:32 Subject: Re: Bug Tracker Modified by crosseyed_uk (20. May 2014, 20:04:55) Fencer: He suggested you employ/engage someone to run the site for you. Selling was never mentioned. Perhaps you could give us an idea of what the site is really worth. 20. May 2014, 19:19:42 Subject: Re: Bug Tracker diogenysos: Re: You may engage someone with some more enthusiasm, for example. In order to keep the site respectable! That has been suggested before. 20. May 2014, 19:18:17 Subject: Re: Bug Tracker ThunderGr: I agree with you. And in my opinion it is the best site to play in. But I get disheartened when he admits that he has no enthusiasm. At times I think is it worth staying in this site if the owner cares so little for people who put money into his site. 30. March 2013, 12:59:36 Subject: Re: Single elimation games thechosen0ne: I think you are missing the point. All I would like is to have the option of having unlimited amount of players. Only having 4 players is too small as some players miss out due the time difference. And sometimes I can't get 8 players if I tick the 8 box. 28. March 2013, 10:18:27 Subject: Single elimation games Modified by crosseyed_uk (28. March 2013, 10:33:37) Maximum number of players: (box) Leave blank if the number of players of your tournament is not limited. Is there any chance that this could done when setting up single elimation games? At present you have to put 4,8, etc. |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |