User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

11. July 2012, 14:43:31
Mort 
Modified by Mort (11. July 2012, 14:50:27)
.. I'd be more worried about the living ones if I were in the USA.

5 kids lost each day to Child abuse, the worst record in the industrialized world.

Millions of reported cases of abuse and/or neglect each year... Texas being one of the worst due to State spending cuts in the services. you know how it works....

... Cut taxes to bring in the rich, that funds to look into child abuse cases and support are slashed is of no importance to the Conservative Gov'nor Rick Perry.

.. they can't vote!!

12. July 2012, 03:45:35
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re:
(V): "I'd be more worried about the living ones..."

That's absurd.How many dead babies do you think are killed by abortions? Abortion IS child abuse.

12. July 2012, 04:14:20
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme: Crazy. The unborn ARE living even as a zygote. By the time they get aborted, many of them get ripped from limb to limb (literally) or scaled in an acid solution. Like catching babies with pitchforks except you can't see the horror.

12. July 2012, 08:24:17
Mort 
Subject: Re:That's absurd.How many dead babies do you think are killed by abortions? Abortion IS child abuse.
Iamon lyme: To worry more about living children is absurd?

so, a campaign to end abortion but lets not worry about those growing up, they feel pain and fear.

12. July 2012, 19:30:02
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re:That's absurd.How many dead babies do you think are killed by abortions? Abortion IS child abuse.
(V): "To worry more about living children is absurd?"

No, it's absurd when you imply pre-aborted babies are not alive. Using your own logic, why would you worry about the "5 kids lost each day to Child abuse" instead of the kids who are still alive?

12. July 2012, 21:44:35
Mort 
Subject: Re: No, it's absurd when you imply pre-aborted babies are not alive.
Modified by Mort (12. July 2012, 21:46:06)
Iamon lyme: Is it.. they can't survive without their host for 9 months. As such the mechanics are that the foetus has to 'trick' the hosts immune system to not kill it. It does not even have a nervous system to be able to feel pain for several weeks. It is as such biologically wise a potential independent being, and only when it is born independently alive.

Children are alive, so are the women who give birth to them.

Abolishing abortion will only drive it underground. Did you think of that and the consequences to the health of women? Did your moral outrage allow you to make a hypocrisy of your "big government", "freedom" and "equality" while you tell all women that they have to live by your rules!!

13. July 2012, 02:48:43
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: No, it's absurd when you imply pre-aborted babies are not alive.
(V): ".. they can't survive without their host for 9 months. As such the mechanics are that the foetus has to 'trick' the hosts immune system to not kill it."

http://static.themetapicture.com/media/funny-baby-alien-movie.jpg

13. July 2012, 04:59:15
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: No, it's absurd when you imply pre-aborted babies are not alive.
(V): "...the foetus has to 'trick' the hosts immune system to not kill it."

Not a perfect ploy if the foetus can't trick the host itself into not killing it.

13. July 2012, 05:03:38
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: No, it's absurd when you imply pre-aborted babies are not alive.
Iamon lyme: I once explained to a woman on BK (no longer here) the exact procedure involved in partial birth (breech birth the baby, turn it over, jam a long needle into the base of its skull, suck out its brains, deliver the dead baby, go have coffee.

She called me a liar and never talked to me again. Sick idiot. She didn't even care enough to get her facts straight. Most pro choicers are like that: ignorant of facts.

13. July 2012, 05:20:01
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: No, it's absurd when you imply pre-aborted babies are not alive.
Artful Dodger: (V) read me the feminist manifesto riot act from the 1970's. It's a bit outdated.

Abortion is big business and that means big money, so (V) can rest easy... the days of back alley abortions are a thing of the past. And all thanks to greed that argues in favor of convenience.

13. July 2012, 05:21:26
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: No, it's absurd when you imply pre-aborted babies are not alive.
Iamon lyme: most abortions of the "back alley" days were done by professional medical personal. Another lie from the baby killers.

13. July 2012, 11:35:27
Mort 
Subject: Re: read me the feminist manifesto riot act from the 1970's. It's a bit outdated.
Modified by Mort (13. July 2012, 12:20:32)
Iamon lyme: I'm sorry that you have to use the "big money" 'act'. Next time you go on about health care prices rising please remember that it is big business that runs the show through lobbying. So many Repub's taking 'bribes' so stocks can look good.

Well done on ignoring facts and using the conservative blinker system when it comes to reality.

I'm sure all the women who'd face jail/death and injury if 'you da man' gets to decide for them will appreciate you being ill informed immensely!!

... NOT.

13. July 2012, 22:02:21
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: read me the feminist manifesto riot act from the 1970's. It's a bit outdated.
(V): "I'm sorry that you have to use the "big money" 'act'."

I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.

"..you da man.."

If you say so.

"Can you stop trying to pettifog?"

Why, am I not doing it right?

14. July 2012, 00:50:42
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: read me the feminist manifesto riot act from the 1970's. It's a bit outdated.
Iamon lyme: The master of pettifogging loves to complain that others do what only he does.

The knucklehead left loves to vilify the rich. But it's the rich that provide the majority of jobs in society. They are the ones that take the risks, sometimes winning and sometimes losing. We peons get the benefits of their efforts in jobs.

If the rich were to pay "their fair share" as Obama is calling for, it would generate 85 Billion more per year. Wow, a lot of money huh? Except that the US spends that amount every 8 1/2 days. And we all know that given more money, the Congress would put that money into paying down the debt right? Fat chance.

15. July 2012, 00:10:15
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: read me the feminist manifesto riot act from the 1970's. It's a bit outdated.

15. July 2012, 01:47:15
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: read me the feminist manifesto riot act from the 1970's. It's a bit outdated.
Iamon lyme: love the chess one lol

14. July 2012, 15:21:58
Mort 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Iamon lyme: So is this finally an admission that you can't blame the government for everything. So, as such a U turn on past stated statements that businesses are as pure as virgin snow!!

Hallelujah!! .... was it a vision from the aliens??

"..you da man.."

Thankfully you are not "da man". Well intended ideas based on ignorant concepts... or as previously known in the UK... "baby kissing for the camera" never do any good.

14. July 2012, 23:32:53
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
(V): "So is this finally an admission that you can't blame the government for everything."

Where did I say the government can be blamed for everything?

15. July 2012, 00:11:37
Mort 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Modified by Mort (15. July 2012, 00:16:10)
Iamon lyme: The general consensus view on this board by most conservatives is that it's ALLLL the governments fault..... A real conservative always blames the government, always blames the "libs".

It is a surprise to hear someone 'conservative' state otherwise.

So, can you tell me what we can blame on businesses from a conservative view, so I can remember for later!!

15. July 2012, 00:00:58
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
(V): "So is this finally an admission that you can't blame the government for everything."

Artful Dodger
28. June 2012, 11:08:10
Iamon lyme: All our troubles can be traced right back to the government.

So is this finally an admission that you believe AD and I are the same person? As I recall you appealed to the Mods to make us stop talking about it.

15. July 2012, 01:46:45
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Iamon lyme: Oh great. Now I'm you again. Just when I was getting over my identity crisis.

15. July 2012, 01:58:38
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
(V): "Hallelujah!! .... was it a vision from the aliens??"

http://i.imgur.com/HCiwS.jpg

15. July 2012, 05:38:58
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Iamon lyme: someone is very clever!

15. July 2012, 07:36:48
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Artful Dodger: I can't take all the credit. Without (V)s insightful comments and pinpoint analysis I would have nothing to work with.

http://slacktory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/drunk-baby-I-got-your-nose.jpg

15. July 2012, 07:55:42
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Artful Dodger: "someone is very clever!"

Oh, you mean the painting of a kid looking up at a "spaceship"! I thought it was clever too. It's in the same style as the old Norman Rockwell paintings.

15. July 2012, 08:55:07
MissDelish 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Iamon lyme: that is so clever....

15. July 2012, 18:41:23
Mort 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Modified by Mort (16. July 2012, 02:44:15)
MissDelish: Clever??

15. July 2012, 12:21:19
Mort 
Subject: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Iamon lyme: sure it wasn't looking like this....

http://php.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/images/d/df/Stage7.jpg


13. July 2012, 05:04:24
Iamon lyme 
Subject: Re: No, it's absurd when you imply pre-aborted babies are not alive.
(V): "...you tell all women that they have to live by your rules!!"

That's a lot of women. Can you be more specific?

13. July 2012, 05:15:19
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: No, it's absurd when you imply pre-aborted babies are not alive.
Iamon lyme: Women do have to live by "our" rules. A woman left her child unattended in her car and the child was taken away and the woman went to jail. Yeah, she broke the "rule."

13. July 2012, 11:24:31
Mort 
Subject: Re: That's a lot of women. Can you be more specific?
Iamon lyme: Can you stop trying to pettifog?

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top