BrainKing - Discussion boards (Politics)

Moderator: Vikings

Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.

All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!

*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."

List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.

Mode: Everyone can post

27. June 2012, 20:57:28

rod03801

show this user posts | show thread | link

I would have to agree that parts of this discussion are FAR from the intentions of this board. I was hoping it was just an "aside" and would end on its own.

So, please. Let's get off of Brainking Politics. Though it got more attention than the fascinating Rupert Murdoch.

27. June 2012, 21:49:44

Papa Zoom

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re: Though it got more attention than the fascinating Rupert Murdoch.

rod03801:

OK, so what's the SCOTUS going to rule on Obama Care tomorrow?

28. June 2012, 06:05:31

Iamon lyme

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re: Though it got more attention than the fascinating Rupert Murdoch.

Artful Dodger: "...what's the SCOTUS going to rule on Obama Care tomorrow?"

It's hard to say. I'm hoping they look to the constitution to determine if any of it is constitutional or not. Some Washington insiders are of the opinion that the constitutionality of Obama care is what the judges should be looking at. Last time I looked that actually was a part of their job description, or is their job description... I'm a bit fuzzy on the details. *cough*

Obama is either going to gloat, or make a big stink over it, that's what I predict... I'm hedging my bets.

27. June 2012, 21:52:13

Papa Zoom

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

rod03801: BTW, I couldn't care less what Murdock does. His actions are no reflection on Fox News and try as some might to make that connection, it's a major #fail.

27. June 2012, 23:19:33

The Col

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re His actions are no reflection on Fox News

Artful Dodger:

thanks, I needed a good laugh

27. June 2012, 23:53:25

Papa Zoom

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re: Re His actions are no reflection on Fox News

The Col: thought you might like that one

28. June 2012, 11:52:05

Mort

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

Modified by Mort (28. June 2012, 11:52:20)

rod03801: Murdoch is not fascinating.. just how politicians are continually kissing upto him regarding getting good press.

It's is perceivable that Fox could switch to backing the Democrats if Murdoch got a better deal from them!!