 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
14. February 2010, 20:19:36 Subject: Re:  Tuesday: To the contrary, I hope you guys will finally nominate someone competent in the primaries. 14. February 2010, 20:41:36 Subject: Re: Pedro Martínez: who do you have in mind? 14. February 2010, 21:32:23 Subject: Re: Czuch: I actually don't have anyone specific in mind… it just seems to me that if I take a look back at the last three elections, neither of the presidential candidates, whether Gore, Bush, Kerry, McCain or Obama, had the qualities to become a president I would respect as a competent leader of the country. If Palin gets in the White House, I will start to believe that there are some sort of three-president turns: three proficient presidents (Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton) followed by three fumbling ones (Bush Jr., Obama, Palin). And maybe it would work further into the past too…  14. February 2010, 21:24:57 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: we need them to make it so any law they pass for us, also applies to them, and any law they pass for themselves, also applies to us! 14. February 2010, 21:37:26 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: I was about to write that I dare say she would be, but then I deleted it because I thought nobody would argue with me anyway… lol 19. February 2010, 06:04:13 Subject: Re:How do you know Palin would be a fumbling prez? She's not been tested in that office yet. Artful Dodger: But, she has been tested as Governor of Alaska & on 3rd grade geography. She failed both rather miserably. 20. February 2010, 04:26:37 Subject: Re:How do you know Palin would be a fumbling prez? She's not been tested in that office yet. Artful Dodger: And only the "right" call her a successful governor. Political savyness does not always mean intelligence. 20. February 2010, 14:05:45 Subject: Re:How do you know Palin would be a fumbling prez? She's not been tested in that office yet. Artful Dodger: I've seen alot of politicians,some I like some I don't, but even amongst the ones I disdain I have never in my life seen such a charicature of a politician as Palin.She tosses out phrases and talking points, but sounds like even she doesn't understand many of the words she uses,it's mind bending..She sounds like a 3rd grader reciting Shakespeare when she talks politics 20. February 2010, 14:19:08 Subject: Re:How do you know Palin would be a fumbling prez? She's not been tested in that office yet. Tuesday: I keep waiting for everyone who supports her to wake up from the dream.I reminds me of the Partridge Family episode where Keith is so taken by a girl he can't hear how badly she sings  21. February 2010, 20:08:04 Subject: Re:How do you know Palin would be a fumbling prez? She's not been tested in that office yet. Modified by The Col (21. February 2010, 22:00:48) Artful Dodger: If you would feel comfortable with her as president, be my guest.I personally wouldn't want her to babysit my cats, let alone president. 21. February 2010, 22:28:32 Subject: Re:How do you know Palin would be a fumbling prez? She's not been tested in that office yet. Tuesday: She must be related to Ed Rendell 21. February 2010, 22:27:05 Subject: Re:How do you know Palin would be a fumbling prez? She's not been tested in that office yet. Artful Dodger: I hope Palin leads a long and healthy life on this planet.I just hope she is kept a safe distance from any impactful political position 21. February 2010, 22:31:31 Subject: Re:How do you know Palin would be a fumbling prez? She's not been tested in that office yet. Modified by The Col (21. February 2010, 22:32:22) Artful Dodger: Obama? He has been a wimp,.Americans like strength, not some guy who allows the republicans to bully him 21. February 2010, 23:57:43 Subject: Palin's "rising in popularity and support" Artful Dodger: I understand she just got a whopping 7% of the vote in a presidential straw poll within CPAC, a conservative group. That would not indicate much support even from the "right". Maybe people are starting see through her charades. 22. February 2010, 00:08:16 Subject: Re: Palin's "rising in popularity and support" Artful Dodger: " Well if you read my post below you would see what I already had to say about that" So you are saying she makes a good town crier even in the guise of a village idiot? 22. February 2010, 00:17:48 Subject: Re: Palin's "rising in popularity and support" Artful Dodger: I f my purpose for posting was the need to measure up to anyone elses opinions,I'd be hurt. 22. February 2010, 00:25:26 Subject: Re: Palin's "rising in popularity and support" Artful Dodger: You Betcha! |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |