User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

4. May 2006, 20:04:08
fismoluni 
Subject: pawns not showing up
Hi,

since a week the pictures of the pawns dont load in my window, which means I dont see them just a strange symbol, any idea why that is?

thx in advance for all answers,
fismoluni

24. January 2006, 16:37:16
fismoluni 
Subject: Re: vacation?
ah sorry for the stupid question, i could now easily answer it by myself, its max 30 days it seems.

fismoluni

24. January 2006, 16:35:41
fismoluni 
Subject: vacation?
hello, just wanted to know how much vacation days the different users have? do some player have endless vacation days?

thx for the answers,
fismoluni

1. November 2005, 13:56:55
fismoluni 
Subject: Re: BKR-Ratings
alanback: hi, I am agreeing that it should not happen like you say, that people just sit on their big rating. But I think that is only one side of the story. Just to tell, I am still in the ranking, its not that what made me write this. But for example Tipau was not in the list now (he will be today again as we finished a game just now), and he one of the world strongest atomic players (if not the strongest) and takes a lot of time to play his games. but he always plays games and i am sure he is the last one who wants to sit on his rating. So my point is, that it makes the rating lists not very accurate if such players are not on it.
I can also understand, that one just has to pay the membership and there is no problem anymore, but I thought this site would also be for people who are content with the free features and I dont know if I like this players to be somehow punished. In the end I dont care that much about rating lists, but on the other hand, if there are rating lists, they should be more accurate than at the moment, where people appear and disappear all the time.

A compromise would maybe be, that only players who are not playing a game at all in a certain variation for a month should be removed, but people who are actually playing games should stay on it. But reading most comments to my post, I think you dont like that compromise as you still fear there are players just playing to stay there. And maybe you hope players will pay just to stay on the rating list.

friendly greetings,
fismoluni

28. October 2005, 13:20:05
fismoluni 
Subject: BKR-Ratings
Hi, I find it ok that inactive players vanish from the rating list, but I think that players who are playing games at the moment should still stay in the rating lists, as a game can take more than a month and I think its wrong to say that a player who is currently playing a game is inactive, even if he hasnt finished a game in the last month. If you understand what I mean.

friendly greetings,
fismoluni

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top