Iamon lyme: loving your pics....so funny

Correction, it must have been the day before yesterday... Yesterday was tame by comparison.

Inspired by yesterdays brawl.. which btw was a lot of fun.

And getting used to using html to create links to addresses... takes up a lot less space.

Cut throat posts.....

Is this a new picture game? lol <<<scratches head>>>

MissDelish: So the teachers are telling you off?

The Col: I asked a Jehovah Witness the other day about their prediction of 1975 being the end of days... They are embarrassed about it basically. Some dude had though the beginning of WWI was the start of the rapture process.

That I can understand. That wasn't a war.. It was generals playing sadistic games sipping sherry, whilst using men as cannon fodder!

MissDelish:

The Col: I didn't tell the teacher anything----?? I was sent a personal message from someone who I don't even know, to keep on subject and dont be personal.

I sent a message back to her/him asking what was wrong but didn't get an answer. ----no worries.

Artfull Dodger love your links :)

One was a 71 year old man at an internet cafe. Two thugs enter. One with a bat and the other with a gun. The BatGuy smashes a computer and threatens everyone while the GunGuy points his gun at the heads of customers.

71YearOldConsealedWeaponCarrier waits for GunGuy to turn his back. 71YearOldConsealedWeaponCarrier pulls his gun and shoots GunGuy who starts running for the door. 71YearOldConsealedWeaponCarrier continues shooting hitting both GunGuy and BatGuy. They run out the door, bleeding from their wounds and trip over each others as they try to get away from the 71YearOldConsealedWeaponCarrier's bullets. As the door just about closes, 71YearOldConsealedWeaponCarrier takes one more shot of the BadGuys who are sprawled out on the sidewalk. Police caught the crooks shortly after that (following the blood trail) and the 71YearOldConsealedWeaponCarrier got a free latte.

Yeah guns!

Um, on guns: Over 2.5 million violent crimes yearly are stopped by PRIVATE gun owners & well over 70% don't have to pull the trigger!

The Col: Don't analyze it. Just go with it.

Artful Dodger: I'm not sure if that was a compliment or an insult , lol

MissDelish: The remarks I made were impersonal. Just to be clear. I'd never get "personal" with the Col.

MissDelish: So you're the on who told the teacher which kids were bad when the teacher came back into the room there's one in every crowd.....politically speaking of course

I didn't think you could make personal remarks to each other in here. There are a lot of personal remarks that I can see.

And how can you keep on topic when there are so many topics going on at once?

Or have I just changed it again hohohoho

The Col: Well I don't blame her for that! I've seen myself on film.

(V): Elvis Costello wrote a song about it

3 million Americans prepping for the end of the world..

... It's gonna happen sn!!

I just wish they could make up their minds on what the date will be. Maybe an armageddon con, con?

Artful Dodger: she dropped the camera in shame

The Col: But do you have it on video? If not, it won't stand up in court.

Artful Dodger: Dad , the family wants to stage an intervention.When mom caught you alternately laughing and crying while poking your Obama voodoo doll up in the attic, she called everyone in tears

The Col: that's paranormal to you son

Maybe you've just earned my distrust.

The Col:

Artful Dodger: you're paranoid man oh man, you're answers to straight forward question should be a textbook study in paranoia

Iamon lyme: Your complaints about V's obfuscating, twisting, and subject changing are starting to convince me that you really are me! Now you really sound like me!

Interesting that a majority of people on this board all agree about that same thing. The only one who can't see it is V himself. Sad really.

ps....and pettifogging.

(V): A real part of the law where? In the UK, in the US? Some laws here are federal, they apply to everyone... everyone in the US. Then there are laws that are different from state to state, and even local laws that may differ from state law due to special circumstances.

By the way, I was wrong about how many questions you were asking. You weren't just juggling apples and oranges, you were juggling apples oranges and bananas.

Iamon lyme: Only one hypothetical, the other was a real part of law question.

Nonsense answers don't count. Enjoy

(V): "It just seems a shame that someone can't answer a straight forward hypothetical question."

You were asking two hypothetical questions. I answered both of them. I wasn't dodging the questions, you were dodging the answers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgJER28ceBA&feature=related

Being an evangelist just doesn't cut it as a qualification in some areas.

God Bless Judge Judy!!

Vikings: No It's not, it was about fairness in debates here disguised around a question.

After all.. if it was a liberal being asked.. the conservative camp here would go on.. and on .. zzzz zzzz

But hey.. Us libs (or undecided) are use to that

rod I wasn't gonna ask it anymore. It just seems a shame that someone can't answer a straight forward hypothetical question.

But hey it's their loss.

written in the 60's
http://www.youtube.com/embed/H3Az0okaHig?rel=0

rod03801:

(V): I'll answer it, the answer is apples and oranges, your question involves liability, where your usual big business complaint involves pricing policies .

we will wait for your usual spin and denial

(V): I think the question has been asked enough times in a row. Please stop spamming the board with it. If someone chooses to answer it, they will. (and have)

Iamon lyme: *sigh* to this question...

If you buy faulty goods. For example a chain saw from a shop. It then when you use it malfunctions and causes you to lose an eye.

You'll just say "buyer beware"

Yes or No?

>>>>> Is dodging questions constantly a conservative value?

(V): Iamon lyme: "You don't know!! Is that why you won't answer a simple question?"

"I don't know" was the answer to your simple question.

Figure it out. If I knew, that would mean I had paid for damaging merchandise. I don't go running through stores like a bull in a china shop, so it doesn't happen.

Btw... for those who may not know.. the law is the cost price. That which the retailer needs to pay to get another one.

Simple.

Iamon lyme: You don't know!!

Is that why you won't answer a simple question?

(V): "Eg.... If you walk into a shop you are then automatically under contract to pay for any goods you damage or break in there.

But, what do you pay? The price on the tag??"


I don't know, but I'll bet the shopkeepers in your area can see you coming a mile away.

Eg.... If you walk into a shop you are then automatically under contract to pay for any goods you damage or break in there.

But, what do you pay? The price on the tag??

Artful Dodger: "Lemon Lime, if you buy a new watch and [disturbing visual imagery]... Does any of this make sense?"

It sure does make sense. And I'm all for helping accident prone people, as long as I can do it from a safe distance.

Iamon lyme: Please stop making a simple question hard

I also mentioned Contract law which starts at the moment you walk into a business. It's a simple rule that everyone should know!! You do know it I'm presuming, so lets cut to the chase....

If you buy faulty goods. For example a chain saw from a shop. It then when you use it malfunctions and causes you to lose an eye.

You'll just say "buyer beware"

Yes or No?