BrainKing - Diskusjonsforum (BrainKing.com)

Moderator: Hrqls

, coan.net

, rod03801

BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com

Liste over diskusjonsforum
Du kan ikke skrive meldinger i dette forumet. For å kunne skrive her må ha et Brain Pawn medlemskap eller høyere.

Modus: Alle kan skrive

2. september 2010, 13:27:48

Vikings

vis innlegg fra denne brukeren | vis tråd | lenke

Rod is correct, Fencer has said in the past that because it is a multi-player game, that collusion is not necessarily cheating, he also has said that is would be almost impossible to prove, for example, there are people defending the possibility that these examples are not cheating, I find it ironic that out of the many claims in the past of cheating, the person that tends to stand up for the accused the most is Pedro,
Mad Monkey, if a formula is being used here, there is not enough information to figure it out,

Don't get me wrong Pedro, I agree with you, I'm just stating what Fencers stand has been

2. september 2010, 13:37:24

Bwild

vis innlegg fra denne brukeren | vis tråd | lenke

Emne: Re:

Vikings: "I'm just stating what Fencers stand has been"
and that,unfortunately, is nothing.
too busy spending eternity with this supposed bk3, and trolling for black rook money,imo.
it seems highly unlikely that these 2(?) players can be 1 apart for so many turns.
whats to stop the multi-nic abusers from over running us with boosting and cheating in prize tournies and other games if this stuff is just continually over looked?

2. september 2010, 14:08:53

Fencer

vis innlegg fra denne brukeren | vis tråd | lenke

Emne: Re:

Bwild: Sounds like "Yes, I am a loser and I cannot stand anyone else being successful" sort of whining to me. Well, if it makes you happy, carry on.

Everybody else: I don't take ponds as serious games and, honestly, I really don't care if people make some agreements while playing. Actually, I was thinking of making some improvements of the pond system and even started to work on it. However, I don't give it a shit now. You can thank Bwild and his ability to be such a nice person.

2. september 2010, 17:04:02

Pedro Martínez

vis innlegg fra denne brukeren | vis tråd | lenke

Emne: Re:

Fencer: You don't give a shit. OK. I'm out of here.

2. september 2010, 17:21:08

Fencer

vis innlegg fra denne brukeren | vis tråd | lenke

Emne: Re:

Pedro Martínez: Fine.

The problem is solved.