Sandoz: we need an explanation as to which version is what. i forget half the proposals.

Nothingness: yes, you are right. I'll come up with an explanation of the 3-game-match idea, soon

Sandoz: Cool, you can enter more than 1 favourite. I have 5 :)

SL-Mark: hehe, in that case your vote would not influence the outcome pretty much ;-)

Sandoz:
I believe Fencer could do the atomic and extinction quite easily, so we should ask for that anyway. Will see if I can amend my choice!

Sandoz: Oh dear cannot amend, but I can vote again :) I see Styleone went for 4 options :)

SL-Mark: grinch! this is how my dictionary translates the German word "Spielverderber" ;-)
not every system is meant to become crushed, if you know what I mean. well, but I see, things aren't that easy, lol.
I suggest, we then change the rule in that way, that everyone may choose more than one favorite. But no multiple identities, Mark!

Alternatively, we switch to a site with a radio-button-poll-tool.

Or, we discuss the whole thing here at the board.

How does the Atomic and the Extinction thing work, anyway?

Sandoz:
Okay I refrain from voting again :)

The Atomic and Extinction variants are expained well in the chess variants:

http://brainking.com/en/GameRules?tp=18

http://brainking.com/en/GameRules?tp=28

(IYT has a different version of atomic chess, which I prefer http://www.itsyourturn.com/t_helptopic2020.html )

What about anti-espionage :)