any suggestions from serious players how an appropriate timing
for obligatory games of top-players [like me :D] should look like ?

a chess game might take even a few months itself ...
how should the right to challenge be defined ?

for the top ten or, twenty ?

quickshots to fix some glitches of the rankings
messing up the whole system won't help - easier
solution could be that a player who makes only
4 games to feel all cosy on the top of a list is
simply removed from it after being idle for 6 months.

as previously stated, I'm able to look through the surface
even by just utilizing the features that are already available
e.g. view profile - look up game-type - and voila, there's
the spot distinguishing masquerade from seriousness ... ~*~