 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}. Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
19. Aprile 2009, 22:00:37 Argomento: Re: Modificato da Snoopy (19. Aprile 2009, 22:03:18)  (V): so what your saying after watching a thirty second video you know every single thing that happened you know everything that was said from this thirty sec clip you say that this officer must be put on trial because the video tells you so what i keep saying why are you so quick to JUDGE you dont all the facts from a 30 sec clip just wait and see what ELSE COMES OUT before jumping to conclusions did you google that last one to find out the laws of the land  19. Aprile 2009, 22:05:53 Argomento: Re: Snoopy: No, I'm saying that no matter what the policeman committed a criminal offence. There is no justification to shove a man from behind by a policeman, especially as the man was not showing any physical signs of attempting to physically harm the police. This is the law. British law. All that is to be decided now re the forensics is what charge the policeman is to be charged with. And apparently there are 10 serious assaults by the police being passed over to MP's to look in the G20 protests. 19. Aprile 2009, 22:09:45 Argomento: Re: (V): and where did you see where that this policeman is going to be charged i havnt heard that yet they still questioning him according to the report ive just read on the BBC 19. Aprile 2009, 22:12:15 Argomento: Re: Snoopy: I give up!! I've explained the law. Read it, look up sites on it. I'm having my dinner  19. Aprile 2009, 22:16:55 Argomento: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED (V): this is taken from todays Times The Independent Police Complaints Commission, which is investigating his death, said: “Following the initial result of the second post-mortem a Metropolitan Police officer has been interviewed under caution for the offence of manslaughter.” The officer, a constable in the Territorial Support Group who has been suspended from duty, attended the interview voluntarily and has not been arrested. 19. Aprile 2009, 22:27:31 Argomento: Re:HE HASNT EVEN BEEN ARRESTED Snoopy: Yes.. and? The film shows that no matter what he committed a crime, the only question is the magnitude of the crime.  |
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Torna all'inizio |