Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

7. Febbraio 2009, 19:08:37
Roberto Silva 
Argomento: Re:
Artful Dodger: For white knights/rooks, buying a year membership resets your vacation days.

For black rooks, buying a year membership for someone else will do it.

7. Febbraio 2009, 19:21:32
rod03801 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da rod03801 (7. Febbraio 2009, 19:22:14)
I think one other thing that a lot of people would like to know is, Is there a limit as to how many times a person can do this in a year. Would the extreme situation of a person buying another year's membership every other month be allowed? (Of course one would have to question that person's motives as to being on a turn based game site) Sounds extreme, and crazy, but there are people who have come pretty close to doing that. Very unfair to their opponents. (And everyone else who happens to be in the same tournaments as them)

7. Febbraio 2009, 19:27:42
"GERRY" 
Argomento: Re:
rod03801: Well said it's about time this was brought up:))

7. Febbraio 2009, 19:33:11
rabbitoid 
Argomento: Re:
"GERRY": This is probably happening very rarely if at all. The basic problem is what to do about people whose pleasure is to play each move in each game 5 minutes before the timeout expires. The answer is nothing, nothing can be done because the rules are respected. Too bad. it's a tough world.

7. Febbraio 2009, 19:40:35
"GERRY" 
Argomento: Re:
rabbitoid: Why let these players bring there tough world to this SITE? ::))

7. Febbraio 2009, 19:43:03
rod03801 
Argomento: Re:
"GERRY": A person who waits until the last minute to make a move is not breaking any rule.

7. Febbraio 2009, 19:46:27
"GERRY" 
Argomento: Re:
rod03801: Yes we all realize that::))

7. Febbraio 2009, 20:03:36
"GERRY" 
Argomento: Re:
rod03801: Since you added to this topic.What would you suggest be done? :))

7. Febbraio 2009, 23:27:01
Bernice 
Argomento: Re:
"GERRY": we all know who is being spoken about and he seems to have a charmed life and it makes one wonder is it because he DOES buy another years membership every other month?

7. Febbraio 2009, 23:40:07
wetware 
Argomento: Re:
Bernice: Is his membership good through the year 2025, then?    :-)

8. Febbraio 2009, 00:31:57
Bernice 
Argomento: Re:
wetware: 2014

8. Febbraio 2009, 02:26:26
rod03801 
Argomento: Re:
"GERRY": Well, I personally don't suggest than anything be done about people who play slowly and take all their allotted time. It is the nature of turn based game sites. I am sure there is not a turn based game site where this issue does not come up. It is the nature of the beast. People who are that bothered by it, should probably only play at Live, real time game sites.

But, beyond that, there are people who have come up with some pretty clever suggestions on ways to help people who are concerned about it, avoid playing those people. I don't recall Fencer ever saying much about these suggestions, so I'm not sure he would do any of them.

8. Febbraio 2009, 13:54:29
Carl 
Argomento: Re:
rod03801: I think we all know who we are talking about here,and i think we should give him a break.It really is'nt any of our business what a young boy spends his pocket money on.If holding up an internet tournament makes him happy,so be it.He'll grow out of it one day i'm sure.

8. Febbraio 2009, 21:09:02
Bernice 
Argomento: Re:
Carl: hahahaha he will love to read the fact you think he is a young boy with too much pocket money....that will hurt his pride something terrible

8. Febbraio 2009, 21:43:04
Hrqls 
Argomento: Re:
ok can we please go back to the subject that matters ... not the person itself but that fact that the system on this site can be used like that

9. Febbraio 2009, 17:05:25
Carl 
Argomento: Re:
Bernice: So are you saying this is'nt the behaviour of a small child? That it's the actions of a rational adult?I find this very hard to believe.Still,we live and learn.

9. Febbraio 2009, 17:10:08
"GERRY" 
Argomento: Re:
Carl: The day you quit learning you could yourself in trouble hey LOL:))

9. Febbraio 2009, 21:14:28
Bernice 
Argomento: Re:
Carl: the number behind the persons name is supposed to be his age according to himself.

10. Febbraio 2009, 10:24:13
Hrqls 
Argomento: game : guess the person
the game (guess ther person) is over ... move it to another board ..
any post from now on this subject will be deleted
(even answers)

feel free to continue on the real thread though (ideas to solve the abuse of vacation days)

10. Febbraio 2009, 11:54:58
MadMonkey 
Argomento: Re: game : guess the person
Hrqls: Surely the easy way is when vacation days are set at the start of the year, that is ALL you get for that year. If you add more membership, then next to this years vacation days have a box or brackets and in there the amount of vacation days you have already for next year, the year after etc.. etc..

In other words, whatever is the set amount for the year that is ALL you get for that year. Any other added is put to one side.

This would make that reason or people doing it pointless, the one we are talking about, just to get more days. Most of us buy membership when ours is either running out, to help others or just because we can afford it at the time, nothing to doing with more vacation days.

This could effect Fencers income though, as those who do it for the vacation reason may not bother.

So is this catch 22 I hope not, common sense should prevail.

10. Febbraio 2009, 12:50:13
Hrqls 
Argomento: Re: game : guess the person
MadMonkey: that would be my solution as well but with the same side thoughts as you have

maybe allow someone to have a maximum twice his allowed amount per year by buying a new membership (like it is now, but then max twice a single membership)

10. Febbraio 2009, 13:01:15
MadMonkey 
Argomento: Re: game : guess the person
Hrqls: Yes, i think that would be fair to everyone

(lets have a Poll lol)

10. Febbraio 2009, 16:10:46
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Surely the easy way is when vacation days are set at the start of the year, that is ALL you get for that year.
MadMonkey

8. Febbraio 2009, 21:50:48
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re:
Carl: It isn't about  how someone spend their money.  I agree with you that's no one's business.  I am saying that we should  have a limit on the number of vacation days anyone can have/use during a calendar year.  Not just this one player, but everyone.  My personal preference is you get your 35 at the beginning of the year, and when they are gone, they are gone.  No more.  If you can't manage 35 vacation days per year, then play fewer games.  If you choose to play that many games, and you run out of vacation games, too bad.  That's the way it goes.

8. Febbraio 2009, 21:57:48
"GERRY" 
Argomento: Re:
Artful Dodger: Yes i also agree on that.

Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio