(返回)
用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Purple 
 Dama

Dama (Czech Checkers).


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5   > >>
11. 十二月 2006, 20:28:01
Purple 
题目: For Everyone A Reminder
Welcome to BrainKing! Our site offers a unique game playing experience that we know you will enjoy. In order to make this experience enjoyable for everyone, we have a few guidelines for all to acknowledge. By signing on to this site you agree to the following guidelines:
General Guidelines: (rules to be applied throughout the site - in games & discussion boards)
This is a family site, thus foul language, sexual language and threats ARE NOT ALLOWED on BrainKing. Discussion Board Guidelines:
This is a game site, not a chat site. The discussion boards are here to enhance the game playing on BrainKing.
No Flame Wars! No Foul Language! Be Nice or do not post.
Moderators are assigned to each board to help watch over the board. They have the right to edit and remove any post which does not agree with these guidelines. They also have the right to hide and ban any user who continues to ignore the guidelines of the site. Taking up personal issues with a Moderator on their board will only get you banned. If you have serious issues with a Moderator, then please contact the moderator first of all. You will find them reasonable if you message them in a calm manner with your complaint. If this does not resolve your problem, either do not visit the boards they moderate, or take it up with Global Moderators.
Baiting is not allowed. That is you should not make post which is intended to provoke other users into posting a negative reply.
Moderators Guidelines:
The job of a Moderator is to watch over the board to make sure other users stay within the guidelines of this site.
If a post does not fall into the site guidelines, the moderator should:
Edit post for content if rest of the post belongs in the board.
Remove the post if none of the post belongs in the board.
Warn user IN PRIVATE about edited/removed post, and point them to guidelines if needed.
If multiple users are engaged in a flame war, a public post saying "stop" can be used.
If posting continues after a warning, the poster should be hidden for at least a few hours, possibly longer (24 hours or more).
If after being unhidden a poster continues, then a ban of the user can be used.
Moderators are free to take more strict or less strict actions as needed, but should try to follow the above guideline when possible.
If the board is getting out of hand, which can happen from time to time with certain topics �" the moderator should change the posting right to "Approve all" until things settle back down. The moderator can also change the posting right to "Approve pawns" if it is needed.
REMEMBER: This is suppose to be a fun game site, so some off-topic post and fun can be a good thing, so be careful not to over-moderate, and try not to nit-pick every post to find something wrong with it.
Consequence:
The BrainKing staff handle incidents on a case by case basis. Some possible actions that will be taken if necessary are:
Posting privileges removed (temporarily or permanently)
Chatting in-game privilege removed
Ban from BrainKing temporarily
Permanent ban from BrainKing
BrainKing staff is small, so if you have a complaint against other users �" please be patient with us while we try to look at all the facts. You have to remember that this is a game site, and we try to spend the majority of our time in improving the game site itself.
What to do if you have problems with other users:
Put that user on your Enemy list
Hide and ignore the other users post. Instead of starting a "flame war" with the user, just ignore them. It takes a bigger person to ignore than try to sink to their level.
If it is on a discussion board, privately see if the Moderator will do anything about a post which bothers you.
If all the above fails, please contact a Global Moderator privately. AGAIN, this should be a LAST RESORT. The more time that is spent on spats between users, the less time that is spent on trying to improve this game site.

11. 十二月 2006, 19:54:38
gandhi2 
题目: Cheats and Programs
Play with your head, it´s easy and exercise your brain. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. Try it

11. 十二月 2006, 18:38:50
Gabriel Almeida 
题目: Programs

Of course, Purple don't like we talk about programs. That's easy to understand!


I believe in Sobek words. I know this post will be deleted, but I'm tired of playing against cheaters, and I still don't understand Why doesn't Fencer do anything. Comercial reasons? Patrick Chu have done the same in IYT, and that's why so few people are still there.


Because of that, I've almost give up of playing Checkers, Czech Checkers or Chess. But I don't like it, because I paid my membership precisly because of some of that games! Fencer, you can not simply ignore us!!! You know that many, many people is tired of this, just as I am. Some of them speack, others are silenced, others are simply bored with these kind of things, and go away. I know a few cases...


Sincerely (and I say this because I really like this site), I hope it will run in "other directions" in the future...


10. 十二月 2006, 00:02:36
mangue 
sure I understand, I hate cheaters too

but you can do nothing, just keep playing with your friends

9. 十二月 2006, 23:33:50
Undertaker. 
题目: Re: peace!
Undertaker.修改(9. 十二月 2006, 23:38:46)
mangue: I don't want war. However, I think everybody have to know who use programs. Now, I know more players what supostly use programs, but many players don't know and I think nobody wants play against players that use programs. But it's only my opinion. Thanks for your help :)

9. 十二月 2006, 21:54:57
mangue 
题目: peace!
mangue修改(9. 十二月 2006, 21:55:21)
I better play against a human with computer as against a human accusing me to be a cheater if I win. I second Purple argument, do not miss respect to your opponent.

If you want to avoid cheaters, try to play some exotic variants like parachute checkers or anti-checkers, there are surely very few efficient program there!

 

Or try to play with some opponents you trust and who trust you and add the cheaters to your blocked users list



9. 十二月 2006, 19:34:44
Undertaker. 
题目: Re: Notice
B L I T Z M E: I think the same

9. 十二月 2006, 18:40:42
Undertaker. 
题目: Re: Notice
Undertaker.修改(10. 十二月 2006, 01:06:59)
Purple: Look, I want play honestly. If I want play�against programs I don't need connect BK. Do you want I�delete my previous post? Ok, I do it. (edited to make it acceptable)

9. 十二月 2006, 18:00:23
Purple 
题目: Notice
Purple修改(9. 十二月 2006, 22:13:05)
We do not tolerate calling people "cheaters" or other insults on any Public Boards. I ask that paid members remove their inflammatory posts. Pawns can not remove their posts so I will do it for them. If this behavior is repeated you will face being hidden or banned. This board is for game discussion. Thank you.

9. 十二月 2006, 12:31:03
Undertaker. 
题目: Re:
Undertaker.修改(9. 十二月 2006, 18:40:15)
sobek: Someone (Purple) wants I delete my post. Sorry everybody

8. 十二月 2006, 22:24:04
sobek 
Undertaker :-)) I watch your game :-) I don't understand :-) stoupa in current game had winning combination in 8 move :-DDDDD and more next game (with by the perhaps? :-)) ) is very very same as Paswil 2.5 (good czech draughts program but not same best) :)

8. 十二月 2006, 22:12:11
sobek 
Undertaker, we play 2 games and You know, that we play correct :-) I check this game and I answer You tomorow :-)

8. 八月 2006, 01:42:53
Nightstorm 
Keep it nice guys.

7. 八月 2006, 22:38:32
sobek 
题目: Re:
mangue: no, because I am better as draughts programs :-))) I use to draughts program to analyze REAL games no net game. I want play against human no computer. If I want play against draughts program, I don't need connect to game server :-)

7. 八月 2006, 21:34:32
mangue 
题目: Re:
sobek: I am totally agreing and this very certain that computer is a problem in "offline" site. This is also the main reason why I hardly ever play chess, unless I know my opponent in real life and trust him.

On the other hand, it is hopeless to get rid of computer assisted opponent. You can write code of conducts, etc...

An opponent playing only the computer moves would be bored quite quickly. However, if you do "study" with a computer, it will be almost impossible to detect.

Also, I am sure that you use a computer to play here at least to make your move and talk on the forums ;-)

7. 八月 2006, 18:57:37
sobek 
题目: Re:
mangue: Mangue,
me friend from czech tolt me about it, and sended me for check draughts program. And if player(his opponent) play all move (from first to last) as program, what do You think? Opponent is genius? Or cheater? And not existed only one but more players. I check another players(czech serious players tolt me, who)and I find next player use program. I am human, no program :-)In real know me more, more good players :-)

7. 八月 2006, 11:22:33
mangue 
of course I want to have human opponents too, but it is my opponent who decides, and I cannot change it

7. 八月 2006, 11:16:07
mangue 
thanks sobek for not saying stupid
you seems to be certain to know who is playing with computer and who is not, so probably you know how a computer is different. By the way, are you a human or a computer

7. 八月 2006, 10:03:38
sobek 
题目: Re:
mangue: sorry but You are crazy (I want wrote stupid)
I beat more programs and "programs players". I more play in real and online, but I want play against people, no PC. I lost only with people

6. 八月 2006, 22:24:16
mangue 
cheaters are definitely annoying, but it is at least as annoying to be accused to be a cheater by a loser as to be beaten by "program"

5. 八月 2006, 23:49:01
Nightstorm 
题目: Re: question
sobek: Do you have solid proof they are using programs or just you think they are from how they play? I dont think putting out a list is a good idea but you could check with Fencer and see what he says and if he ok's it then feel free to post it.

5. 八月 2006, 09:57:41
sobek 
题目: question
Who has like experience as I?
More czech players use draughts program.
I can make out list players,which use on 100%

21. 一月 2006, 02:48:49
saii 
题目: Draughts
Happy New Year,

Sophisticated contestants please message me to arrange faster matches.

No cheating!

4. 十二月 2005, 20:25:57
portugal 
Hrm, reading the rules does help, i guess. ^_^;
:-b

Hmm, i thought the "X/Y/Z" notation had something to do with the vacation days and bonus days and whatnot...
Never thought there could be a total time limit for games, and 1 day is for sure too low to me. ^^

Thanks for clearing it. :)

3. 十二月 2005, 20:43:12
Fencer 
题目: Re: badly implemented time limits ? *57*
portugal: Read the time control line more carefully. It says "time for game", not "move".

3. 十二月 2005, 18:16:51
portugal 
题目: badly implemented time limits ? *57*
Good evening.

It might be just me that didn't understand the rules of the time limits properly, but... see:

http://brainking.com/en/ArchivedGame?g=1220608

Last move by me is «2. December 2005, 01:46:42»
But then i get a message:
«You ran out of time (Gothic Checkers) francescolr 2. December 2005, 08:39:59»

?!? I thought i had one day for each move?
I don't understand this. x_x

14. 十一月 2005, 20:53:14
coan.net 
题目: Re: Czech Checkers
Marfitalu: Most likely a draw.

If white could catch Black sleeping, white could try to place 1 piece at A7, a second piece at C5

Then try to place your third piece where black would have to jump, and then auto-jump and capture C5 piece also - leaving them on B6 so you can jump and win.

But if black is smart, they can most likely stay away from that trap also and go for the draw.

14. 十一月 2005, 20:41:13
Stoupa 
题目: Re: Czech Checkers
Marfitalu: draw

21. 十月 2005, 20:42:23
mp friesland 
题目: FALL CZECH CHECKER TOURNAMENT
there are too few czech check ty's , so I decided to host one myself.
!! czech check it out !!
Don't mis out on this one, it will be a big one; sign up soon, it will start November 12

10. 十月 2005, 11:27:35
bitwisexor 
题目: Re: Draw?
Pedro Martínez: I don't, but thanks.

10. 十月 2005, 00:05:35
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Draw?
bitwisexor: If you have one of your queens on the main diagonal, you should be able to win.

8. 十月 2005, 13:25:31
bitwisexor 
题目: Draw?
Proboably a stupid question, but is a pawn with no way of getting to a queen if the opponent plays well and two queens vs a queen a draw?

19. 六月 2005, 02:28:22
coan.net 
Hello

We are currently looking for a new moderator of this board. Are you interested?

  • More Information: Check out the Members only board

  • To Apply: Just Send me a Message

    PLEASE do not post if here since I may miss it, just send me a message. Also feel free to send me a message with any questions.

  • 22. 五月 2005, 14:41:26
    mp friesland 
    题目: rating calc
    am playing a game against Sodek, and it says below the game that a draw would result in zero bkr ponts for me. That looks odd to me, as Sodek's rating is 250 points higher then mine.
    You would think a draw against such a fine player would help you increase your bkr somewhat ..

    4. 五月 2005, 13:08:29
    pauloaguia 
    题目: Re:
    SilentBob: Draw.

    4. 五月 2005, 09:44:01
    AlterMann 
    Stupid question from a checkers apprentice ;-(
    Is 2 queens vs. 1 queen a draw or a forced win?

    10. 一月 2005, 09:17:23
    Hrqls 
    题目: Re:
    Pedro Martínez: thanks for the answer .. i was mistaken though .. i am playing a game of 'checkers' and not 'czech checkers' ;) .. i will post the question again on the 'checkers' board

    8. 一月 2005, 23:59:31
    Har 
    题目: Re: jumping
    Har: Thanks for your replies. I couldn't find anything in the czech rules,and didn't remember such in the checkers. Learn something new everyday!

    8. 一月 2005, 21:26:22
    Ferjo 
    题目: Re: Re:
    BIG BAD WOLF:
    We both know that in Checkers rules there is no such rule, so a new player will not go to the Checkers rules because he assumes he knows the checkers rules. He even play the checkers and see okay, I know this game so no problem. Then he plays the variants, and you know that we have to explain the rules to new comers, because they don't understand it. Again I'm not saying because of me or you, we are already fan of checkers variants. I really think that the Checkers variants rules should be improved.

    8. 一月 2005, 20:48:17
    coan.net 
    题目: Re: Re:
    Ferjo: I will agree with you that the rules are not always easy to understand. (If someone would like to re-write the rules to be clearer, I know Fencer would take a look at putting them up - if they are good enough.)

    But, in the rules it says something about the rules being the same as Checkers.

    You then need to look at the rules of Checkers, and you will find this rule:

    If the player has more possibilities to capture opponent's pieces, he/she can select any of them. However, when a queen (in variants with long jumps) can make a jump, the player cannot select a pawn to jump with.

    Again, I agree the rules would be MUCH beter if all directions are in one place, and not have to keep looking at different pages to find the complete rules.

    8. 一月 2005, 18:43:37
    Ferjo 
    题目: Re:
    Stevie:
    I enjoy the game too, but if there is a section with game rules why not they are acurate instead of being somehow "tricky"...
    Thats what I'm saying.
    And I meant Chances of course not change on the last post.. sorry about that.

    8. 一月 2005, 18:40:58
    Stevie 
    I dont mind to be honest, I enjoy the game enough that if I lose..I try to learn from it, and if its to a Czech player..then from what you say, I should learn more :o)

    8. 一月 2005, 18:39:22
    Ferjo 
    题目: Re: jumping
    Stevie:
    No Stevie I don't agree, it just means that Czech players have more change to win, because they know very well the game.

    8. 一月 2005, 18:36:10
    Stevie 
    题目: Re: jumping
    Ferjo: It just means that some of us "accustomed" players get a chance at a few easier wins with the new players then

    8. 一月 2005, 18:33:32
    Ferjo 
    题目: Re: jumping
    Fencer:
    Sorry Fencer but it doesn't and it should, this is what its written on game rules concerning Czech Checkers:

    "Czech Checkers differs from the standard Checkers by the queen (similar to a king in Checkers) movement. When a pawn reaches the last row, it turns to a queen immediately and the queen can move and any spaces diagonally. It can also jump over an enemy's piece any spaces diagonally and make multiple jumps. Moreover, a queen does not have to land directly behind the captured piece, it can choose (when jumping) any other empty square in the line but does not have to jump over two or more pieces at once. The following picture shows a multiple jump made by the white queen (before and after the move):

    2 images of Board, explaining the Queen Capture.

    The other rules are the same as for normal Checkers."

    In my opinion the rules of Checkers variations are somehow vague, its a thing that must be improven at BK. For me doesn't matter because I accompany often the games, so I adapt quickly. But for new players I reckon its very confused. Because what they read in the rules and what its implemented its very different.

    8. 一月 2005, 10:48:47
    Fencer 
    题目: Re: jumping
    Har: Yes, it is mentioned in the rules.

    8. 一月 2005, 04:16:04
    Har 
    题目: jumping
    if your in position to jump with a queen,and a pawn. Is it a rule you must jump with your queen? I've had this happen twice and would've prefered to have jumped with the pawn

    21. 十二月 2004, 22:27:57
    Stevie 
    I reckon it depends on positioning. Now the rule of having to capture most is in place, its made it easier to stay away from draws. So I would say the list of draws you just showed Pedro could be reduced a bit

    << <   1 2 3 4 5   > >>
    日期和时间
    在线的朋友
    最喜欢的讨论板
    朋友群
    每日提示
    Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
    回顶端