(返回)
用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Purple 
 Dama

Dama (Czech Checkers).


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

21. 十一月 2009, 18:07:00
mangue 
thanks Hexis, it clarifies a lot ! I wish I knew it before :)

19. 十一月 2009, 20:41:11
mangue 
mangue修改(19. 十一月 2009, 20:41:55)
why cannot I play Qh2xb8 in Czech Checkers (Dundee vs. mangue) ? at move 27black ?

12. 十二月 2006, 18:48:54
mangue 
题目: Re: Programs
Gabriel Almeida: Why doesn't Fencer do anything

because there is nothing to do, afaik, it is impossible to detect if someone use a computer here

10. 十二月 2006, 00:02:36
mangue 
sure I understand, I hate cheaters too

but you can do nothing, just keep playing with your friends

9. 十二月 2006, 21:54:57
mangue 
题目: peace!
mangue修改(9. 十二月 2006, 21:55:21)
I better play against a human with computer as against a human accusing me to be a cheater if I win. I second Purple argument, do not miss respect to your opponent.

If you want to avoid cheaters, try to play some exotic variants like parachute checkers or anti-checkers, there are surely very few efficient program there!

 

Or try to play with some opponents you trust and who trust you and add the cheaters to your blocked users list



7. 八月 2006, 21:34:32
mangue 
题目: Re:
sobek: I am totally agreing and this very certain that computer is a problem in "offline" site. This is also the main reason why I hardly ever play chess, unless I know my opponent in real life and trust him.

On the other hand, it is hopeless to get rid of computer assisted opponent. You can write code of conducts, etc...

An opponent playing only the computer moves would be bored quite quickly. However, if you do "study" with a computer, it will be almost impossible to detect.

Also, I am sure that you use a computer to play here at least to make your move and talk on the forums ;-)

7. 八月 2006, 11:22:33
mangue 
of course I want to have human opponents too, but it is my opponent who decides, and I cannot change it

7. 八月 2006, 11:16:07
mangue 
thanks sobek for not saying stupid
you seems to be certain to know who is playing with computer and who is not, so probably you know how a computer is different. By the way, are you a human or a computer

6. 八月 2006, 22:24:16
mangue 
cheaters are definitely annoying, but it is at least as annoying to be accused to be a cheater by a loser as to be beaten by "program"

3. 九月 2004, 08:09:02
mangue 
wtg fencer!

14. 八月 2004, 14:15:14
mangue 
it would be an enhancement to be forced to take the most pawns

26. 四月 2004, 14:17:04
mangue 
题目: Re: If the player has more possibilities to capture opponent's pieces, he/she can select any of them.
it is then too easy for one player with one queen to draw, for example by playing a1-h8-a1-h8, which draws even against 12 queens !

25. 四月 2004, 17:55:05
mangue 
题目: Re: If the player has more possibilities to capture opponent's pieces, he/she can select any of them.
my problem is that I often do not read the rules without enough care! Then I get surprised LOL

16. 四月 2004, 16:37:27
mangue 
题目: If the player has more possibilities to capture opponent's pieces, he/she can select any of them.
I have been quite surprised by this rule actually, in "french checkers", you must capture the most pawns possible. That is, if you have one move with one capture, and one move with two captures, you have to play the move with two captures.

Ok, regards
M.

日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端