 |
|
 TournamentsPlease use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE Tournaments Team Tournaments May 2024 - Nackgammon 4 - starts 25th May June 2024 - Frog Finder 4 - starts 8th June June 2024 - Plakoto 3 - starts 22 June 您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。 状态: 所有人能发表
7. 十一月 2013, 21:59:14 题目: This doesn't seem right to me I am forced to finish in second place because of the S-B totals even though the first place winner is rated almost 300 points higher than me. I deserved to have a playoff with him for the tournament title. He and I split our two games so that alone should have been given credence. This feels wrong. I am definitely not a proponent of the S-B. Isaac Newton (1643-1727) 8. 十一月 2013, 10:36:09 题目: Re: This doesn't seem right to me JerNYC: Having a paid membership must be the tie breaker  8. 十一月 2013, 11:14:28 题目: Re: This doesn't seem right to me The Col:  9. 十一月 2013, 19:03:50 题目: Re: This doesn't seem right to me JerNYC: you played even against eachother, but he won against #4 while you lost against #4 ... that earns him more points of course you won against #5 and he lost against #5, but you gain less points against #5 than against #4 9. 十一月 2013, 19:10:29 题目: Re: This doesn't seem right to me 被happyjuggler0修改(9. 十一月 2013, 19:11:55) JerNYC: Which is more impressive, a player who manages to beat another player who won a lot of games, or a player who beats another player who could only manage to win a small number of games? Anyway, that is the logic of S-B, for better or for worse. People who lose on tiebreaks tend to be unhappy about it, while people who win on tiebreaks seem happy enough.... |
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有 回顶端 |