BrainKing - 讨论板 (BrainKing.com)

监管者: Hrqls

, coan.net

, rod03801

BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com

讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。

状态: 所有人能发表

16. 十二月 2011, 22:47:32

Bwild

显示此用户所有帖子 | 显示索引 | 链接

题目: lol

One hundred thousand usersof which 400 are real people ..998,600 are multi nics! and only 4 bonuses left!

16. 十二月 2011, 22:53:08

Fencer

显示此用户所有帖子 | 显示索引 | 链接

题目: Re: lol

Bwild: Thank you for expressing your level of thinking.

Now please come back when you have something meaningful to say.

16. 十二月 2011, 22:55:49

Bwild

显示此用户所有帖子 | 显示索引 | 链接

题目: Re: lol

Fencer: just sayin....

16. 十二月 2011, 23:25:12

Thad

显示此用户所有帖子 | 显示索引 | 链接

题目: Re: lol

I'd be curious to know how many of the 100,000 users have logged in in the last week, month, and year (or maybe six months). Seems like that would give the best indicator of just how many users there are here.

16. 十二月 2011, 23:43:50

Bwild

显示此用户所有帖子 | 显示索引 | 链接

题目: Re: lol

Thad: there are those that repeatedly log in under different user names on a dailly basis. throws a big wrench in the numbers game....but hey....looks good on paper. lol

17. 十二月 2011, 00:03:00

Aganju

显示此用户所有帖子 | 显示索引 | 链接

题目: Re: lol

被Aganju修改(17. 十二月 2011, 00:03:44)

Bwild: So what's your point?
Of course BK has not 100000 active distinct users. Nobody thought that.
You believe that FaceBook has 800000000 active distinct users??

17. 十二月 2011, 00:39:22

Bwild

显示此用户所有帖子 | 显示索引 | 链接

题目: Re: lol

Aganju: just shedding a little light through the darkness....but hey some DO care.

17. 十二月 2011, 00:11:20

Thad

显示此用户所有帖子 | 显示索引 | 链接

题目: Re: lol

Bwild: OK, then it would at least give us an upper bound, no? And a better one than the 100,000 we have now. ;-)