用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: MadMonkey 
 Tournaments

Please use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE



Tournaments



Team Tournaments

Feb 2026 - Hyper Backgammon (3 wins match) 6

March 2026 - Logik 9

March 2026 - Battleboats Plus 8





每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑马级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206   > >>
5. 十一月 2004, 21:26:05
coan.net 
A second round will start even if you do not have enough slots available.

So with a second round starting, it is possible to be over your game limit. (of course you would then not be able to start any new games until you are under the limit.)

5. 十一月 2004, 21:05:07
eagle eye 
题目: nuber of free slots in the second round
How many free slots I have to have for a second round in a tournament when there is 1 winner in section 1 and 2 winners in section 2.

http://brainking.com/game/Tournaments?trg=4480&tri=13078

5. 十一月 2004, 19:55:08
coan.net 
Why would we need a special rook membership without the ability to create fellowships - we have that, it's called a Knight membership basicly!

Maybe a "trial" 2 month Knight for 5 EUR or something?

5. 十一月 2004, 19:42:37
Bry 
题目: ughaibu
- I totally agree - hence I got a Rook pretty much straight away after first logon. What I am trying to suggest is targetting those people who are sceptic about paying for membership to games sites, or those who dont want to pay for such a time period of 6 months. You could even make it a month for a few Euro's.

My betting is once they get a load of games going, get into see Fellowships and the chat board, they will have faith in the site and renew for the 6 months at full price. I also said it should be a one off offer for pawns only.

5. 十一月 2004, 18:37:19
bumble 
I think bwild meant 4oz = a quarter pound (lb), Scarlet.

5. 十一月 2004, 17:09:43
ScarletRose 
I thought 16 oz was a pound... Hmmm..

5. 十一月 2004, 15:33:22
bwildman 
4 ounces=a pound
7grams ;-)

5. 十一月 2004, 15:29:49
grenv 
what the #$% is an ounce? ;)

5. 十一月 2004, 15:21:09
bwildman 
bwildman修改(5. 十一月 2004, 15:22:08)
quarter ounce in this area ;-)_~~~

5. 十一月 2004, 15:19:09
grenv 
I have no idea how much a pack of cigarettes costs. How about expressing it in terms of pints of beer or grams of pot instead.

5. 十一月 2004, 14:36:23
bwildman 
题目: Bry
guess I missed that part of your suggestion.

5. 十一月 2004, 10:17:33
Nirvana 
题目: Nooks and Crannies
Is looking for two more players to join its anti~froglet team for the forthcoming team Tournament, would anyone like to join in?

Nooks and Crannies

5. 十一月 2004, 08:00:48
Bry 
Bry修改(5. 十一月 2004, 08:01:30)
bwild - my suggestion earlier was the 3 month Rook wouldnt be able to form a Fellowship - for your exact reason, but would just have the access to more games and more tournaments - tempting them to get into playing loads of games and multiple tournaments - hopefully encouraging them to renew at the end of 3 monts for a full 6 months package - then getting full Rook benefits.....

5. 十一月 2004, 02:32:54
Nirvana 
题目: Tournaments to sign up for :

5. 十一月 2004, 02:23:08
ChessCarpenter 
题目: Joust at the Realm #3
Congrats to Matarilevich for winning the Joust!!
Well done! Thanks for everyone else for playing in the Tournament!
Joust at the Realm #3

4. 十一月 2004, 22:37:24
bwildman 
bwildman修改(4. 十一月 2004, 22:38:27)
as a rook,they can form fellowships...if they lapse after 3 monthes,there would be an open fellowship.I would think that with the existing numer of fellowships(some members have more than 2) the fellowship increase and subsequent abuse,would defeat the purpose.

4. 十一月 2004, 21:21:58
Bry 
Hrqls - yes - but ideally it would be better if people were Rooks in my eyes. That would quell all the discussions re Knights in Fellowships and numbers of games allowed etc (see posts at the bottom of this page and just before...)

bwild - why?

4. 十一月 2004, 17:13:59
Nirvana 
题目: Red Squirrel History Group Tournament
Red Squirrel Anti Nuts

Open to anyone who wants to play!

4. 十一月 2004, 13:14:11
Hrqls 
what would the price have to be ?
you can already have a half year knight membership for only 10 euro .. isnt that cheap enough ?

4. 十一月 2004, 13:13:16
bwildman 
题目: 3 month rook
I think this would be disasterous to the fellowships.

4. 十一月 2004, 07:55:59
sLaMdAnCe13 
*fiGHt cLUb*

4. 十一月 2004, 03:15:05
Eriisa 
ROFL, I swore I wouldnt start any more tourneys for a while, but I cannot pass up that name! LOL@sLaMz

4. 十一月 2004, 02:38:27
sLaMdAnCe13 
sLaM'z " oH mAn! i'Ve bEEn bAnNed... aGaiN."

4. 十一月 2004, 02:37:42
sLaMdAnCe13 
jOIn My dAMn bG tOuRnEy.

4. 十一月 2004, 00:39:29
bumble 
Fencer might reconsider now that the methods of payment have changed a bit.

4. 十一月 2004, 00:34:52
Bry 
ahh, right. Cheers Bumble. Bleedin good idea though!! lol

4. 十一月 2004, 00:05:23
bumble 
I believe something similar was suggested months ago but I think Fencer stated it was not economically viable at that time due to PayPal's charges.

3. 十一月 2004, 20:43:16
Bry 
Dont know if this has been suggested before, but how about an "Introductory Level" 3 month Rook membership? (Available to a pawn upgrading for the first time only) with the benefits of a Rook - i.e. number of games/tournaments etc but without the creation of a Fellowship facility (incase they dont renew).

A smaller price (and time period) may tempt would-be pawns and once they get the benefits and see how good the site is, any subsequent renewal should be a minimum 6 months as usual....? It wouldnt cost the site any loss of revenue but potentially gives an affordable taster to those who dont want to commit to a full 6 months....

3. 十一月 2004, 20:35:07
Bry 
Filip - I think you should offer first - set an example ;0)

3. 十一月 2004, 19:13:26
grenv 
No, I said 1/10th of a cent.

That would be 5c, or $18 per year.

:)

3. 十一月 2004, 18:53:02
Fencer 
All right, who wants to be the first volunteer of this system? :-)

3. 十一月 2004, 18:38:16
Kevin 
Even playing only 50 moves a day is $0.50. Over a year that's about $180...

3. 十一月 2004, 16:35:31
Nirvana 

2. 十一月 2004, 16:57:39
grenv 
How about charging per move. I suggest about .10c per move.

(That's 1/10th of a cent)

:)

2. 十一月 2004, 16:53:33
bwildman 
hehe....we'd have to find another programming gnu! LOL:)

2. 十一月 2004, 16:51:23
coan.net 
... but then who would keep improving this site??? :-)

2. 十一月 2004, 16:50:53
bwildman 
LOL:)
your English expressions are getting better!!

2. 十一月 2004, 16:48:44
Fencer 
Over my dead body.

2. 十一月 2004, 16:48:02
grenv 
how about if the memebership was the price that a knight is now, but with rook priveleges? Maybe then a lot of pawns would join?

2. 十一月 2004, 08:32:45
Nev Nake 
???
what was that???

2. 十一月 2004, 06:54:40
M&M 
题目: Re: Membership
Big Bad Wolf makes pefect sence on his part of having a choice of membership its like taking away the freedom of speech as long as its negotable which fencer has allowed for everyone in the world to make the choice seeing how some people can not afford or have the time to be a rook.So it comes to there choice without that there would alot more pawns rather then knight and the pawn issue with nicks is out of control to point that nobody knows who is who.thanks Big Bad Wolf and Kevin.

1. 十一月 2004, 20:37:35
Pafl 
CHRISTELLESHEN: It's not your turn now, you must wait until Smoulicek is online and makes his first move. Meanwhile you can accept challenges for more games - you can find them by clicking on the third line of the column on the left. Welcome to BK !

1. 十一月 2004, 20:12:41
CHRISTELLESHEN 
i like to play please now in backgammon my number is 11654

31. 十月 2004, 21:31:15
Czuch 
Every person here has different needs and wants from somebody else. I dont need or want the ability to play 600 games (or1600 or whatever) But I like running fellowships. You may want to play 600 games, but dont care at all about discussion boards, or whether you can show a picture of yourself. Most of us already get more than we need when paying for a knight anyway.

Why should it be cheaper for you to play 600 games and not use fellowships, than it is for me to play 30 games and use fellowships?

One price one membership, and everyone can do whatever they want to do. Some people save 42 cents a day, other people pay an extra 42 cents a day, all the new people never know any different.

31. 十月 2004, 21:15:35
Thad 
题目: Re:
Many people only want to play games here, so it makes sense to have one paying level that gives a player the ability to play more games and a higher level that gives a player the ability to start fellowships & tournaments, etc.

31. 十月 2004, 21:00:37
Czuch 
I see what you are saying Green.
You are either a pawn, with limited features. (which makes sense, to give people a chance to enjoy the site enough to determine if they want to join) Or a full membership, where you get all the benefits available (except access to the dice rolling codes) on the web site.

There wouldnt be another choice, so no one would feel like they only use such and such, like BBW said. It wouldnt even be an issue.

Maybe you could make the cost somewhere between what the two prices are right now, and Fencer would not lose any money?

This all started because there are not enough members to have good team tournaments. If you can just squeeze another 42 cents per day out of the rooks, you could give the knights a discount by 42 cents per day, and you would have plenty of members who are allowed to play in more than one tournament... without losing money.

<< <   197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端