用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: MadMonkey 
 Tournaments

Please use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE



Tournaments




Team Tournaments

April 2024 - Logik 5 - starts 27th April

May 2024 - Fevga 3 - starts 11th May

May 2024 - Nackgammon 4 - starts 25th May

June 2024 - Frog Finder 4 - starts 8th June

June 2024 - Plakoto 3 - starts 22 June





每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   > >>
7. 十月 2018, 21:32:47
Fencer 
题目: Re: Brainking Tournament Page
TerryS: Good idea. What limit do you suggest?

18. 七月 2015, 13:47:05
Fencer 
题目: Re: Congrats
Papa Zoom: Aye sir.

12. 十一月 2011, 09:34:15
Fencer 
题目: Re: Pedro Martinez new black rook !
FrancescoLR: Should I activate it now or wait for the tournament to finish?

4. 九月 2010, 10:13:48
Fencer 
题目: Re: thanks Fencer
Snoopy: Oh, did I?
Yes, of course. BrainKing did it, it's a part of a cleanup script which is occasionally run automatically.

31. 八月 2008, 11:34:08
Fencer 
题目: Cleanup
The mentioned tournaments has been deleted and all indexes recalculated (to reflect the real status of open tournaments).

31. 七月 2008, 07:52:14
Fencer 
题目: If someone does not read the blog

30. 七月 2008, 08:02:01
Fencer 
题目: Re: Prize tourny - brains.
afella: Well, the former purpose of this rule was to generate an additional income for BrainKing itself. However, it is no longer necessary, so it could be increased to 100%.

24. 六月 2007, 07:08:22
Fencer 
题目: Re: seedings in single elimination
joshi tm: I received many complaints when the first tournaments had been released with random seedings.
But it can be done as an option.

23. 六月 2007, 14:50:27
Fencer 
题目: Re: seedings in single elimination
"Snoopy": The point is to get the top players to the final rounds. I will make a note about it in the blog later today.

22. 六月 2007, 15:04:42
Fencer 
题目: Re: How is this a time out?
purplehawke: It makes sense but you don't understand Fischer's clock. The game started 30 days ago, now it timeouts.

3. 六月 2007, 20:21:47
Fencer 
题目: Re: Something is not right here
America is #1: You are not allowed to post screenshots of our site to another public page. Moreover, it would be much more useful if you provide a tournament URL, I don't have time to decipher the images.

22. 三月 2007, 11:48:12
Fencer 
题目: Re: please advise:
Nirvana: Another one who does not read the blog, not even the game news. The rules has been updated, a horizontal line is not taken as a winning combination.

2. 二月 2007, 10:00:41
Fencer 
题目: Re: tournament page
helloguesswho: I agree with you, it is very annoying.

25. 一月 2007, 15:45:07
Fencer 
题目: Re: Ribbit
furbster: I guess so. BBW is the game inventor.

16. 十一月 2006, 13:06:36
Fencer 
题目: Re: Estonian open
Jaak: That's a nice tournament announcement.

8. 九月 2006, 08:00:41
Fencer 
题目: Re: Minimum number of players
Walter Montego: I've got the seeding tables from Pedro Martínez, they might be a little different to yours but I guess it is correct too.

7. 九月 2006, 12:08:26
Fencer 
题目: Re: Minimum number of players
Walter Montego: The seeding should be correct now. For new tournaments. This is an example: JoshiTM's all open Single game Eliminator 8 #2

6. 九月 2006, 19:42:24
Fencer 
题目: Re:
Chaosu: Of course it is possible if you have a credit/debit card. Furthermore, beginning 14th September, you'll be eligible to have a full-featured PayPal account.

2. 九月 2006, 08:41:15
Fencer 
题目: Re: A L'il Help...
srnity: Yes, I guess this small bug should be fixed.

30. 八月 2006, 23:01:22
Fencer 
题目: Re:
Jason: Not necessary to make it that complicated. Just copy and paste the tournament URL and BrainKing will automatically add the tournament name.

2. 七月 2006, 21:54:31
Fencer 
题目: Re: Edit
Mr. Shumway: Yes.

2. 七月 2006, 21:36:41
Fencer 
题目: Re: Edit
WellyWales: You probably missed the red message all changes must be confirmed by me before they are visible.

12. 六月 2006, 07:53:40
Fencer 
题目: Re:
gogul: Yes. But you can kick them out.

7. 六月 2006, 20:02:55
Fencer 
题目: Re: Antichess
Retep: From rules: "Who loses all pieces including the king or cannot make a legal move, wins the game."
However, this question belongs to the Chess Variants 8x8 board.

4. 六月 2006, 15:13:08
Fencer 
题目: Re: tournaments and the tournament tip
tiv noi: Good idea, maybe I'll add a special rule to the tournament creation system.

15. 五月 2006, 14:31:52
Fencer 
题目: Re: Offering a prize money for a tournament
nabla: You don't need to use Brains for that. Just select the prize checkbox when you create the tournament and then use the standard Paid Membership page to pay for the prize. That's all.
I don't think there would be a problem with not enough players.

10. 五月 2006, 16:59:46
Fencer 
题目: Re: Question on tourney fees
SafariGal: Nothing. They disappear.

5. 三月 2006, 15:12:54
Fencer 
题目: Re: A question
Marfitalu: It is.

19. 二月 2006, 20:07:40
Fencer 
There is no point to continue in this discussion because I am not going to do any changes anyway.

17. 二月 2006, 07:07:42
Fencer 
Please.

17. 二月 2006, 06:58:45
Fencer 
题目: Re: tournament for Bumble
JMDLOVESNIRVANA: It's only and only up to the tournament creator. In all cases.

6. 二月 2006, 14:20:22
Fencer 
题目: Re: CONGRATULATIONS
Groeneveld: Why don't you have a look?

5. 二月 2006, 08:17:26
Fencer 
题目: Re: Sponsored tournament with an entry fee
Walter Montego: Of course it is okay, such sponsored tournaments (without an entry fee) are already supported.
About gambling, I don't think any kind of gambling happens here because even if you pay Brains to participate in a tournament, you cannot win a real money. And to create an event with a prize is absolutely legal.

3. 二月 2006, 08:03:14
Fencer 
题目: Re: rabbitoid's idea
KotDB: The solution is to play tournaments with multi-win matches. 1-win match is almost equivalent to a normal game but draws are not counted to the result.

3. 二月 2006, 07:22:36
Fencer 
题目: Re: rabbitoid's idea
KotDB: Generally said, when you play in an elimination tournament, you should play to win, not to draw. Yes, it requires a more risky way of playing but that's just an attribute of this system.

2. 二月 2006, 22:54:41
Fencer 
题目: Re: rabbitoid's idea
Thad: The BKR value at the moment of accepting the draw is always used.

2. 二月 2006, 12:53:33
Fencer 
题目: Re: single elimination
rabbitoid: Yes, that's a good idea.

2. 二月 2006, 09:09:41
Fencer 
题目: Re: single elimination
Luke Skywalker: Game slots are not used for single elimination tournaments. Because you'll never play more than 1 game at the same moment.

2. 二月 2006, 09:09:01
Fencer 
题目: Re: Single elimination
Lambik: I might change it.

1. 二月 2006, 19:08:45
Fencer 
题目: Re: single elimination
Luke Skywalker: Yes, this is a known issue. A side effect of new features :-)

1. 二月 2006, 14:13:39
Fencer 

1. 二月 2006, 10:44:25
Fencer 
题目: Re:
plaintiger: It is currently disabled because I need to test it first. But I'll enable it soon (by uncommenting one line in the source code ).

1. 二月 2006, 10:13:28
Fencer 
题目: Re: help 8.6.2) Prize tournaments with an entry fee
Retep: It was just an example. Nobody says the prize must be always only 25%. The tournament I've just created has 40% prize for the winner.

1. 二月 2006, 09:47:39
Fencer 
Doesn't matter.

31. 一月 2006, 23:04:59
Fencer 
题目: Re: help 8.6.2) Prize tournaments with an entry fee
arpa: Why don't you wait for tomorrow? The S-B is already fixed, it just needs to be uploaded.
Btw, I don't like the word "stealing".

31. 一月 2006, 22:27:09
Fencer 
题目: Re: help 8.6.2) Prize tournaments with an entry fee
arpa: Huh?

29. 一月 2006, 15:10:44
Fencer 
题目: Re: Moving tournaments aloong
Walter Montego: I am not working on it. But I plan to do so.

29. 一月 2006, 12:21:02
Fencer 
题目: Re: Moving tournaments aloong
Walter Montego: Simply said, when it's clear than one (and only one) player would have more points than anybody else, regardless of results of the unfinished games of the same section, he can be declared as the winner. In all other cases when S-B points could affect the final order, it's more complicated and it's safer to wait until everything is completed.

29. 一月 2006, 11:54:24
Fencer 
题目: Re: Moving tournaments aloong
Walter Montego: It's easy to cover simple situations where one players wins all games in his sections - then nobody else can be the section winner. In other cases it can be a little more complicated, as you say, many "if this, than that". It's not the biggest priority to implement it now but I will think about it.

29. 一月 2006, 10:17:29
Fencer 
题目: Re:
gringo: Because the current system is working like that. The new one might have a more sophisticated algorithm.

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端