用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251   > >>
9. 三月 2010, 22:45:28
Bernice 
题目: Hey Jules....
I wouldnt like to be sick in this hospital....hahahahahha

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2885315/Docs-thought-baby-was-gout.html

9. 三月 2010, 21:59:15
Bernice 
题目: Re: I love it when you're wrong. Which is most often.
Pedro Martínez: if you put the geocities addy into the "waybackmachine" you might get a result.....it is unreal how you can get back on a lot of things with this website....no guarantees ut might be worth a try

9. 三月 2010, 21:43:00
Ferris Bueller 
题目: Re: The real bigots are on the left.

Artful Dodger:   You state as the conclusion to this post that, "it's the liberal policies in America that are at fault for ALL the racial problems."


I will certainly grant that neither party can wash its hands of a racist past, & that Dirksen was a hero to the civil rights movement. But, here in the South, we had only 1 political party to speak of until after the Civil Rights Act passed.  Democrats were the only party in this region from Reconstruction to that time.  Senator Thurmond switched parties in '64 because of the Civil Rights Act.  Many of the Dems you mentioned would not be considered "liberals" cuz there was only 1 game in town.


LBJ, whose hands were not clean either, knew he would loose the Dem Party in the South by promoting & signing the Civil Rights Act.  Sure enough, Nixon was able to use a "Southern Strategy" & '68 & '72 to win elections & set up a strong Republican base there.  Many of the Conservative Southern Dems switched parties to the GOP aftewards.  The few that stayed, like Hollins, changed some their positions.  Others like George Wallace & Lester Maddox remained Dems but became loose cannons.  Today, now that all the Party switching has taking place, the Dem. Party, in particular the Progressive wing, is very weak in the Southern states.


But, I agree with you that both parties have a checkered past when it comes to race relations, but there are some compexities, particularly in the South.


9. 三月 2010, 21:37:31
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: I love it when you're wrong. Which is most often.
Artful Dodger: By the way, thanks for that “research” at Geocities. Your links are awesome. First you post a quote and refer to a Wikipedia site of Guizot which does not even remotely say anything about the quote you post, and then you refer to a non-existing research. But am I surprised?

9. 三月 2010, 21:33:33
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: I love it when you're wrong. Which is most often.
Artful Dodger: Find five differences:

A) If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.

B) Not to be a republican at 20 is proof of want of heart; to be one at 30 is proof of want of head.

9. 三月 2010, 20:17:39
Bwild 
题目: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Churchill

9. 三月 2010, 19:12:55
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
被Pedro Martínez修改(9. 三月 2010, 19:14:46)
Artful Dodger: Guizot didn't say that. It's impossible. Being a liberal and a conservative is and was virtually the same thing in France.

9. 三月 2010, 10:52:33
Mort 
题目: Re: the Japanese Internment Camps during World War II.
Artful Dodger: Blimey.. whichever site you got this lot from likes to distort history. Does it also come with a cleaning solution for the right wingers and neo-nazi groups of conservative background in the USA.

.. You know, when men were real men, women were real women.. n' small furry creatures from the Alpha Centuri system were real small furry creatures from the Alpha Centuri system!!

9. 三月 2010, 06:31:39
Bernice 
题目: Re: wow
Artful Dodger: what about seman-tics...are they dangerous ROFL

9. 三月 2010, 05:12:08
BadBoy7 
题目: wow
Poli Tics can be as dangerious as Deer Ticks

8. 三月 2010, 20:02:15
Mort 
题目: Re:
Tuesday & GTCharlie: We already do pay to see some animals as they are so rare. In some cases due to hunting, etc some species need to be bred for introduction back into the wild.

I prefer the open park zoo's and animal sanctuary's. Good to see lion's roam somewhat.

8. 三月 2010, 19:51:55
Mort 
题目: Re: And IF real, either it is anthropogenic or it is not.
Artful Dodger: No it can be many factors including man made pollution. It's not just the sun, the seasons, a fart by a gigantic space monster and some of mankind's problem with remembering to look after our home for the sake of a buck.

The orangutan is facing the loss of it's habitat so we can have cheap food and cheap chocolate. Arrangements made to protect the orangutan's habitat and that of the Indonesian rainforest are being broken by men who just love money for those who don't care.

8. 三月 2010, 19:34:45
tyyy 
题目: Re:
Tuesday:I agree. the days of zoos and circus should be over.. leave the animals alone.. like that orca incident recently.. they're called "KILLER WHALES''... let them swim in the ocean.. leave them be

8. 三月 2010, 17:55:47
tyyy 
题目: Re:
(V): I don't like Zoos.. they smell too much.. how about an interactive web site?

8. 三月 2010, 17:53:28
Ferris Bueller 
题目: Re: Growing low-oxygen zones in oceans worry scientists
Tuesday:   Good post from Mclatchy.  It basically states that global warming has been continuous due to depleted oxygen in the ocean related to global warming.  The article cites Oceanographers & studiers of marine biology.  I would trust them more to indicate that global warming has taken place since 1998 than the absolute claims by weathermen who appear on the O'Really Factor to do the bidding of big oil companies.  Just my humble opinion.

8. 三月 2010, 17:10:23
Mort 
题目: Re:
GTCharlie: Zoo's will be more popular, they can hang a sign "extinct. biodiversity levels to small in the wild to continue". People can pay to have their photo taken!!

8. 三月 2010, 16:29:24
tyyy 
ahhhh you're too quick!!!

8. 三月 2010, 16:28:05
tyyy 
sorry...just kidding,, don't get mad, i love animals also

8. 三月 2010, 16:27:17
tyyy 
well ..looking on the bright side of things, less polar bears should mean more seals for the Canadians to hunt and club..right???

8. 三月 2010, 09:03:04
Mort 
题目: Re:
Artful Dodger: And isn't it true that the number of scientists in the USA exceeds the 2 million mark so 31K is not a big proportion. about 1-2%.

Isn't it true that with regards to data on polar bear population that in most cases they cannot be sure, with many population figures coming back as "unknown".

7. 三月 2010, 23:04:15
Pedro Martínez 

7. 三月 2010, 22:43:59
Mort 
... one as I said

7. 三月 2010, 22:41:22
Mort 
题目: Re:
Artful Dodger: Why? You know I'm right.

7. 三月 2010, 22:39:09
Mort 
题目: Re: global warming "deniers"
Artful Dodger: The arguments? Is this some strange reference to a Monty Python sketch??

7. 三月 2010, 22:36:52
Mort 
题目: Re:
Artful Dodger: No Art, I do not make things up. Go look, prove I am wrong or accept your sources are a bit biased.

7. 三月 2010, 22:35:34
Mort 
题目: Re: global warming "deniers"
Artful Dodger: Bill Nye knows the science, I see no mention of having the qualifications to do so..... mechanical engineering, he's qualified in that field. Nothing I can see about matters to do with climate.

7. 三月 2010, 22:23:38
Mort 
题目: Re:
Artful Dodger: Yes I found sources on the web. You can too very easily. And I guess you already know this, or suspect such information.

Hey it's today go have a cuppa and relax and let the web inform you.

7. 三月 2010, 22:16:32
Ferris Bueller 
题目: Re: global warming "deniers"

Artful Dodger:  My local weather lady, who is quite nice on the eyes I might add, is also a meteorologist & knows the science quite well, also.  But, she does not presume to be an expert on global warming.  Niether, to the best of my knowledge, does she do work for big oil cos.  IMHO qualifications do matter.  Monetary interests does have an influence on opinion.  The fact that these 2 guys appeared on O'Reilly Factor does not make them experts.  My guess is that they were doing it for showmanship.  Or, to represent their moneyed interests.  Same for those people who appear on Keith Olberman (sp?)


As for for the absolute assertion that there has been no global warming since 1998, I'm not a scientist & I can't say for sure (& neither can you).  But, I can say that the vast majority of scientists don't hold that view, or the view that a lot of global warming is not man made.


7. 三月 2010, 16:54:55
Mort 
题目: Re: global warming "deniers"
被Mort修改(7. 三月 2010, 18:44:52)
Ferris Bueller: Since a big wrong prediction in the 80's here no weather man is stupid enough to say "my prediction on weather is 100%".

Did you guys in the USA get any acid rain by chance in the last 20 years or so? The type caused by pollution that killed forests??

7. 三月 2010, 16:51:37
Mort 
题目: Re: Ok, so without your usual nonsense when challenged, how about you make your best case to support the above assertion?
被Mort修改(7. 三月 2010, 16:56:18)
Vikings: I'm still waiting for you to tell me what you consider efficient, I'm still waiting for you to report on your bank's and their bonuses.

But hey... Republicans here seem to be above such honesty and perspective. Hence my comparison of private business and government, both run by humans. as I don't know your personal view on what is considered well run!

btw.. those prisoners in the USA jails who make for the USA military such things as body armour and battle helmets.... how is the equipment holding up?

From a British point of view I can see how you guys from the USA might have problems with perspectivity and relativity, after all... during the Northern ireland war (involving terrorists) many private people in the USA gave money which ended up paying for weapons that killed civilians over here as well as soldiers and police.

After 9/11, right wingers moaned about the French, who supplied info on another terrorist attack attempt which with the help of the Canadians stopped said attempt. Just because they did not agree with Bush.

7. 三月 2010, 10:11:21
Vikings 
题目: Re: Ok, so without your usual nonsense when challenged, how about you make your best case to support the above assertion?
(V): Uhm, I.m still waiting for that well run government system, instead of you changing the point

<< <   242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端