用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6   > >>
28. 九月 2017, 23:59:14
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Carnie: Yup, that is correct. We do not even have the Internet and I am typing this on a typewriter connected to a potato. Toilet paper is a problem indeed. The most popular party in my country has actually teamed up with some of your fellow citizens to import some striped fabric for this purpose. They say it is very soft. I cannot wait to feel it.

28. 九月 2017, 21:15:57
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Carnie: Oh yes! Your Kleagle must be proud of you. Keep it up!

15. 九月 2017, 18:57:59
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Ghost town
Carnie: Agreed. I also like the Jefferson in Trump.

24. 三月 2014, 18:13:50
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Papa Zoom: Deal? Mother Russia decides and takes…

3. 一月 2014, 06:33:30
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Ukraine.......
ketchuplover:

Ich Bin Ein Ukrainian!

wtf?

20. 五月 2013, 18:20:25
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: The cover up of Watergate was not the fault of the president nor anyone in his administration.
(V): What exactly do you think the first eight words of your post mean?

1. 十月 2011, 18:59:07
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
(V): That's your opinion, not a fact. A fact is that Britain is no longer as great as it once was…

18. 八月 2011, 20:09:34
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Riots in Manchester
Mousetrap:

18. 八月 2011, 18:22:04
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Artful Dodger: Not really. The mankind is running out of time on this plannet. We only have about 100 years left. :)

http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/nutrition/12841/Humans-will-be-extinct-in-100-years-says-eminent-scientist

16. 八月 2011, 18:02:20
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Stop buying products from corporations and see how far that gets you.
Artful Dodger: As for chain stores, you almost ALWAYS save money shopping there. Overhead doesn't matter when you sell in bulk. That's why so many mom and pop's have gone out of business. It's tough to compete with a huge store.

Exactly. If I got 80% off on each purchase I make “by avoiding a chain of stores and going to a local shop”, the chain stores would soon go bankrupt.

11. 八月 2011, 06:33:54
Pedro Martínez 
“Is that Norway?”
“Yeah.”
“This is UK.”
“Yeah?”
“We need to borrow someone…”

2. 八月 2011, 23:44:43
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
(V): While the British Wonderland has experienced the peaceful talks between the nice unionists and the nicer nationalists…

2. 八月 2011, 22:59:57
Pedro Martínez 
题目: don't believe everything the Right here say
(V): You don't say… The “Right there” say something differently than the “Left there”?

28. 七月 2011, 14:52:43
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: it's about manners. You are supposed to use someone's name when referring to them in a conversation with someone else.
Artful Dodger: I stand corrected! … or actually I sit corrected… (and now I lie corrected)

28. 七月 2011, 14:47:17
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: it's about manners. You are supposed to use someone's name when referring to them in a conversation with someone else.
Artful Dodger: You better do that. When there's nothing of merit to argue against, typos are always a good reason for argument…

28. 七月 2011, 14:29:50
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: it's about manners. You are supposed to use someone's name when referring to them in a conversation with someone else.
Artful Dodger: Right. By now, Tuesday has tried to teach the people on this forum how to use conjunctions (“don't you start a sentence with them!”), prepositions (“don't you end a sentence with them!”) and pronouns (“don't you use them to refer to people in conversations with someone else!”). I can't wait for the other word classes…

28. 七月 2011, 14:19:13
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: it's about manners. You are supposed to use someone's name when referring to them in a conversation with someone else.
Justaminute: Her point was clear: “You are supposed to use someone's name when referring to them in a conversation with someone else.” I fail to see any further specification there.

28. 七月 2011, 12:40:26
Pedro Martínez 
题目: it's about manners. You are supposed to use someone's name when referring to them in a conversation with someone else.

8. 七月 2011, 12:06:08
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: An attempt to minimise the damage of the phone hacking to his empire....
(V): Yup, well done, Murdoch… that's what I call great business skills…

22. 六月 2011, 10:38:17
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: when learning about the Civil War, we were always taught that "we" were the good guys and "we" won that war.
Übergeek 바둑이: It must be just you. Bahrain, Yemen, Morocco and Syria – all of them have some oil reserves. Lybia – there is no such country.

21. 六月 2011, 04:35:57
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Tuesday: It's called ellipsis…

21. 六月 2011, 04:30:58
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Pedro Martínez修改(21. 六月 2011, 04:35:33)
Tuesday: The English language is so meager in your world…

20. 六月 2011, 22:47:00
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Yup, exactly. The rule is a myth and doesn't make any sense.
Artful Dodger: To a certain extent, I do agree that the use of a preposition at the end of a sentence might look inappropriate. In particular legalese tends to use, for example, “change in which we believe“ instead of “change we believe in”. But, teachers who teach that a conjunction at the beginning of a sentence looks stupid are just stupid themselves…

20. 六月 2011, 21:23:01
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: And another thing......
Artful Dodger: one of those "rules" that really isn't

Yup, exactly. The rule is a myth and doesn't make any sense.

20. 六月 2011, 15:37:56
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Luke 2:6–14
Tuesday: So I got an F from someone who thinks English sentences should never start with a conjunction. Funny.

20. 六月 2011, 15:36:40
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Luke 2:6–14
Tuesday: Of course they aren't sorry. If they were, they wouldn't have edited the part out in the first place…

20. 六月 2011, 15:34:01
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Luke 2:6–14
Tuesday: And your point is? The rule claiming that a sentence should not be started with a conjunction is a myth. As well as the God… But I should at least give you some credit for being successful in changing the topic in just one post.

20. 六月 2011, 15:07:40
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Luke 2:6–14
Tuesday:

And so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered. And she brought forth her firstborn son and wrapped him in swaddling clothes and laid him in a manger; because there was no room for them in the inn. And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid. And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.

20. 六月 2011, 15:02:43
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Tuesday: But why not?

20. 六月 2011, 14:31:22
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Tuesday: And isn't it stupid to expect them to apologize before getting a reaction?

8. 六月 2011, 17:56:38
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Pedro Martínez修改(8. 六月 2011, 17:57:12)
(V): “Muslim organizations, mosques and imams have endorsed the preceding fatwa as of July 28, 2005 (see below).”

Where exactly below can I see it?

By the way, do you read Quran, QurŒan, QurԒan, QurҒan or QurӒan?

18. 五月 2011, 20:11:21
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:

18. 五月 2011, 15:09:26
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:

4. 五月 2011, 11:25:50
Pedro Martínez 

26. 四月 2011, 20:25:58
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: politics
Iamon_lyme: I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like my grandfather did. Not yelling and screaming like the passengers in his car.

21. 四月 2011, 03:12:15
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Bernice: And how should HAHAHAHA be spelt? j/k

20. 四月 2011, 18:33:46
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Bwild: I like saying elligent things though…

20. 四月 2011, 14:22:41
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Tuesday: … except for your post.

14. 四月 2011, 11:27:09
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: The white mans' reign is over, or being challenged, so a woman being prez will happen.
Tuesday: Sounds quite anti-white and anti-man.

13. 四月 2011, 20:26:57
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Tuesday: What on Earth is “anti-woman”? I have barely gotten over people calling each other “anti-American” and now there are some who are “anti-woman” and “anti-man”?

24. 三月 2011, 15:46:24
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: clusterfark
Übergeek 바둑이: No worries, it's often misspelled even by journalists… :)

24. 三月 2011, 15:38:16
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: clusterfark
Übergeek 바둑이: The name of the country is “Libya”. :)

21. 三月 2011, 10:42:19
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: The Empire strikes back
Tuesday: He "deserves" to be prez, but wouldn't make a good one.

Why? Because his face twitched and got red at debates?

9. 三月 2011, 10:23:21
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Artful Dodger: Agreed. As regards Guantánamo, Obama is a total disappointment.

4. 三月 2011, 22:29:43
Pedro Martínez 
题目: and the moral compass is..........?
Tuesday: … in your head

4. 三月 2011, 05:18:06
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Use of homophobia, homophobic, and homophobe has been criticized as pejorative against those with differing value positions.
Tuesday: “imo...lgbt is a morel issue...same as incest and pedophilia”

What book? Well, I don't see any reference to any book in his post.

4. 三月 2011, 04:49:44
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Use of homophobia, homophobic, and homophobe has been criticized as pejorative against those with differing value positions.
Tuesday: I don't twist what you said. You said that adultery is mentioned more in a book than homosexuality. I say: SO WHAT?

4. 三月 2011, 04:35:40
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Use of homophobia, homophobic, and homophobe has been criticized as pejorative against those with differing value positions.
Tuesday: So why are doing the same thing yourself? Do you need a book to tell you what is more “moral”?

4. 三月 2011, 04:24:36
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Use of homophobia, homophobic, and homophobe has been criticized as pejorative against those with differing value positions.
Tuesday: … so you brought up a book.

4. 三月 2011, 04:21:25
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Use of homophobia, homophobic, and homophobe has been criticized as pejorative against those with differing value positions.
Tuesday: However, homosexuality is mentioned more in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy than adultery.

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端