用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331   > >>
1. 七月 2006, 13:32:10
WellyWales 
题目: No action points
WellyWales修改(1. 七月 2006, 21:17:00)
Look at this with 13 games going

http://brainking.com/en/Statistics?p=4&u=3989&yf=2006&mf=7


<the link has been amended, it was showing 15,000 + points>

1. 七月 2006, 11:35:42
King Reza 
题目: Re: Action points
KotDB: I agree totally.  Actually, even if I open all discussion boards, BK doesn't realize if I'm reading them or not.  It's just opening and closing an dis of no certain use.  Moving points is better, in my opinion.

1. 七月 2006, 11:00:09
Peón Libre 
题目: Re: Action points
Jason: It's not only your opinion. I'm all for giving out rook memberships as prizes, but competitive discussion-board reading seems like a rather strange criterion.

As for the rest, I suspect we're talking about different things. But I'll leave it at that.

1. 七月 2006, 10:43:37
Jason 
题目: Re: Action points
KotDB: well i did what was said on here as a test and it worked for me , so yes it has , thats why im not even going to consider trying to join in on this game ......its daft ....but thats only my opinion .

1. 七月 2006, 10:40:01
Peón Libre 
题目: Re: Action points
Jason: No, it hasn't. I've seen only hints, questions, and speculation, mostly baseless and incorrect.

1. 七月 2006, 10:30:21
Jason 
题目: Re: Action points
KotDB: Its already been said how to do on here lol ,

1. 七月 2006, 10:09:46
Peón Libre 
题目: Action points
I've just discovered that it is possible to receive points many times for reading the same posts. Between 200 and 300 of my points are the result of this experiment and should be removed from my score. But it's unlikely to matter, because I intend to bow out of the competition. I have neither the time nor the patience to keep up this craziness for a month, and I couldn't accept a prize in good conscience if I won by exploiting such a loophole.

And before anyone asks: No. Unless your name is Fencer, I will not tell you how.

1. 七月 2006, 09:25:18
WellyWales 
题目: Re: Boards
Fencer: I think so to Filip

1. 七月 2006, 09:21:45
Jason 
题目: Re: Boards
Jason修改(1. 七月 2006, 09:26:51)
Picasso1012: ONE point i believe ,unless you was on last night and then you would have got SIX POINTS
TWO points for a public board .

1. 七月 2006, 09:19:16
Picasso1012 
题目: Re: Boards
Fencer: sorry, just checked in. excuse my ignorance. If I read the boards at 55 messages per page how are points accumulated. Thank You.

1. 七月 2006, 07:58:52
playBunny 
O2i: I don't know what you mean by multiple windows being open (ie. for what and how?), but I made a mistake about the accounts. I've just reread the rules page and seen that you can get referrals for new guest accounts, in which case, yes, someone could register 100 a day... My bad.

1. 七月 2006, 07:42:34
02i 
题目: Re:
playBunny: having multiple windows open doesnt make any sense either but it is earning some people quick points ;)

1. 七月 2006, 07:40:21
playBunny 
02i: Guest accounts are not memberships. You don't get anything for referring a new guest account. That would make no sense.

1. 七月 2006, 07:35:12
Fencer 
题目: Boards
Looks like I underestimated the usage of discussion board points. 6 is too much, 1 would be better.

1. 七月 2006, 07:32:34
Uninvited 
题目: New things
Is there going to be a chart on the people with the most points as it gets higher every month?

1. 七月 2006, 07:21:30
02i 
题目: Re:
playBunny: lol. how much money did you pay? a pawn is also a registered account dear. yes you only get 50 points for it but its still better then 6 points.

1. 七月 2006, 07:13:48
playBunny 
02i: Then I'm not sure I understand what the problem is with someone creating 100 accounts and referring to themself - 100 subscriptions is a lot of money to pay for some points in a competition! Or are you talking about something else?

1. 七月 2006, 07:10:42
02i 
题目: Re:
pawnme: well , there can be provisions for that too. people who share the computer can say that they do and then they can have their accounts separate but registered as a family or friends or group or whatever and not be allowed to refer one another or play against each other to prevent giving more than normal points or wins to someone. and playbunny i am talking about new registered accounts not guest visits.

1. 七月 2006, 07:06:58
playBunny 
题目: Testing...
playBunny: Ghostie postie

1. 七月 2006, 07:03:46
playBunny 
02i: Points for referrals work in the same way as Brains - only for new Members, not guest accounts.

1. 七月 2006, 06:59:13
Clandestine 1 
题目: Re:
02i: but.... (to play Devil's advocate) what if there were 2 or more people playing from the same computer, let's say at a college dorm or even from a family computer. Should a family only be limitted to one account?

1. 七月 2006, 06:56:21
02i 
题目: Re:
Vikings: as far as your explanation goes , maybe thats it but that matter can only be resolved if the site is modigfied in a way that only one page of brainking can be opened at a time from 1 computer and if that can be done , it would also solve the problem of people having multiple accounts thats is if the coputer id is stored for each new account registered , that sort of thing is present on other sites like iyt.com where you can only create 1 new account from a computer. uptil now we are talking about illegal points from discussion boards but whats to stop someone from reistering 100 new accounts everyday from his computer and referring him/herself for all of them and right now there is no way of checking in as to who is legit and who is not.

1. 七月 2006, 06:55:35
Clandestine 1 
题目: Re:
pawnme: Give it a whirl and let us know if it works.

1. 七月 2006, 06:55:11
Clandestine 1 
题目: Re:
02i: You need to reverse the order so it displays the pages from oldest to newest.

1. 七月 2006, 06:52:17
02i 
题目: Re:
pawnme: i dont think the pages matter like i said. i had 2000 new messages and they were on maybe 50 pages but as soon as i open 1 page they all stop appearing to be new ...even the ones on the next 49 pages.

1. 七月 2006, 06:50:40
02i 
题目: Re: just moved to the #10 spot...
LionsLair: ur no. 9 now

1. 七月 2006, 06:41:39
LionsLair 
题目: Re: just moved to the #10 spot...
LionsLair: ...now I'm at #8...lmao...

1. 七月 2006, 06:40:15
LionsLair 
题目: just moved to the #10 spot...
... not that I think I deserve it, as I've only earned 7 points from moves, but I opened every available message I could and I have 823 points... most messages I couldn't even read as my language skills are limited to english and broken spanish :o)
... just to show there is a slight flaw with this theory of "board points"

1. 七月 2006, 06:38:14
Vikings 
题目: Re:
pawnme: nope

1. 七月 2006, 06:37:13
Clandestine 1 
Hmmmm, I wonder if I just received points for editing my post - lol

1. 七月 2006, 06:34:29
Vikings 
5 is the minimum, mine is set for 50

1. 七月 2006, 06:33:26
Clandestine 1 
题目: Re:
Clandestine 1修改(1. 七月 2006, 06:36:18)
02i: If you set your page to only display a certain amount of messages (I can't remember how low you can go) then you can review each page separatly, rather then having all your messages on one page. You may have 100 pages to review (equaling 600 points), and that is just for one board. You may even have more then 100 pages to review! I guess you would have to view them from oldest message to newest message and set the display to a minimum. As for me, mines set for the max and I only view the newest messages because I can't be bothered to go back 3 years in time to review old messages (or at least bring the page up).

1. 七月 2006, 06:32:57
Sylfest Strutle 
题目: Re:
Vikings: But aren't the messages marked as read when the first window opens?

1. 七月 2006, 06:31:53
Vikings 
题目: Re:
02i: if you open up multiple windows, you can read all messages once for each window

1. 七月 2006, 06:30:43
02i 
题目: Re:
Vikings: so either i didnt understand or execute it properly or thats not it.

1. 七月 2006, 06:29:30
02i 
i read ur theory about opening 5 messages per page and opening last messages first ...it didnt work for me ...

1. 七月 2006, 06:28:40
02i 
what you mean?

1. 七月 2006, 06:27:09
Vikings 
题目: Re:
02i: he used multiple pages

1. 七月 2006, 06:22:39
02i 
but i have no clue how luisifer got 10000 or lamer 3000 ...theres something else they are doing that is unknown to the rest of us.

1. 七月 2006, 06:22:02
LionsLair 
题目: Re:
whopper:ok, so I read it, play a few game moves, see more "new" messages, read them and get 6 every time I view a "new" message? seems fishy to me if someone hovers the discussion boards waiting for new messages... as many do waiting for an opponent to move...

1. 七月 2006, 06:21:03
02i 
...as long as there is atleast 1 new message ... not if i visit every time a new message appears , i get 6 points for every one but if i visit after 12 hours with 10 new messages , i still only get 6 points for all 10 instead of 60 points.

1. 七月 2006, 06:18:48
02i 
题目: Re:
LionsLair: actually your theory was total opposite of whats true. someone like me who never reads has 2000 unread messages but after i open page i only get 6 points for all but if im a regualar , i get 6 points every time i `visit

1. 七月 2006, 06:15:19
Sylfest Strutle 
题目: Re:
LionsLair: You get 6 new points for reading this, since it's new. If someone else has replied as well since you last visited this board, you still get only 6 points.

1. 七月 2006, 06:09:41
LionsLair 
题目: Re:
02i:
..ok, so that threw that theory out the window, but I just got 6 points for reading vikings message, then went to main page, checked online opponents, saw a new message in my fav boards area(this one I am replying to, and got another 6 points... so as well as making available moves it looks like it pays to read every "new" message that hits the discussion boards... correct me if I'm wrong...

1. 七月 2006, 06:06:28
playBunny 
02i: You're right. Whatever Luisifer's trick was he was doing it with this board, which has only 20 messages! ;-)

1. 七月 2006, 06:03:52
02i 
ive had many unread messages as i dont regularly read messages but when i open page with 2000 new messages , i still only get 6 points for all on the page or next so i dont think that this flaw is present or if it is theres another trick to it and not just having lots of unead messages.

1. 七月 2006, 06:01:14
Vikings 
题目: Re: scam or flaw?
LionsLair: it's only a flaw if people set it up to be. otherwise they would only get 6 points no matter how many messages there are on the board.
by the way, I'm setting the over-under at 200,000

1. 七月 2006, 05:57:28
LionsLair 
题目: scam or flaw?
...nothing scientific here, but it seems all top action points winners at this point have gotten the bulk of their points from board points...
... the flaw with this is that someone that reads boards regularly is at a disadvantage, as they may only have say 10 "new" messages to read on the "brainking.com" board, and a user that never has read the board has 18,000+ "new" messages to read... thus creating a very large margin of points for such...
...is this a scam or cheating?... no, just a minor flaw in the tallying system for said "action Points"...
...I'm sure Fencer will fix this problem...
...just my two cents worth... as always, "happy Gaming!" >^.^<

1. 七月 2006, 05:33:08
redfrog 
题目: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: i agree - not something to worry about - fencer is not likely to let people abuse him like some are trying to do....

1. 七月 2006, 05:31:53
coan.net 
题目: Re:
nightmagic: My actually reason for posted at all was to make sure others who were worried about a scam, or possible others worried about cheating (or wanting to cheat themselves) would probable most likely be fixed by Fencer the next time he is on - I never meant to get so worked up about it but just started to answer posts which made it seem like I'm the one worried about it, but like I said - I'm not worried about it since Fencer will probable clear it all up in due time.

<< <   322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端